One thing that has not got enough attention: the new "Uyghur language and literature" textbooks that replaced the supposedly subversive (CCP approved) old ones, teach Uyghur language with old Chinese lit translated into modern Uyghur. Uyghur literature itself was mostly cut.
This is like teaching Spanish literature, not with Don Quixote or Garcia Marquez, but with Shakespeare or Updike translated into Spanish as the main texts. And saying that teaching Spanish with Don Quixote is separatist, and throwing the textbook editor in prison.
The "old" textbooks were produced 2010-11, burned 2016. The clear intent of the ginned up textbook scandal was to undermine Uyghur as language, and reflects the shift to assimilationist policies following Xi Jinping's rise to power. Intellectuals were arrested on this excuse.
If anyone has copies of either older or newer Uyghur til-ädäbyat textbooks, it would be very helpful to see them!
Uyghur literature is older than Beowulf. PRC assimilationist policies are trying to erase it by cutting it from textbooks and calling it subversive and separatist for Uyghurs to study their own mother language and its history. Same as demolishing old architecture:
a cruel, desperate effort to wipe out the past that PRC propaganda can't explain away with false historical narratives. Shows how profoundly insecure the CCP is about Xinjiang that it can't figure out how Uyghurs are part of PRC without trying to deny obvious cultural diversity.
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
The flaws in the argumentative logic are so cringe-worthy, but also so telling. I've been trying to articulate the ironies and problems with current PRC whataboutism over racial, indigenous issues (next)
This trolling is seemingly premised on the idea the "Americans" (as a collective) want to defend our national past, and have no grounds to critique CCP. But in fact, the obvious answer is "yes, coerced cotton-picking is bad. That's why we're calling it out (next)
when YOU do it!" Interning and torturing people because of ethnicity is very bad. So we're calling it out. Trying to eradicate a group's language is very bad. Stop trying to erase Uyghur. (next)
State Dept determination, 1/19/2021, that PRC policies in Xinjiang Uyghur Region comprise genocide and crimes against humanity is important. Below, first, essentials, then I'll discuss Pompeo's lies in the statement (a thread for the record) 1/22 bit.ly/3nTi5ig
This follows a November Biden campaign statement calling the policies in Xinjiang "genocide," so we can expect the new administration will continue to endorse this determination once it takes office tomorrow 2/22. axios.com/biden-campaign…
To be more than rhetoric, however, such a determination must serve a strategic purpose. Hopefully, will help Biden admin rally other nations to collectively condemn PRC treatment of Uyghurs and others. EU, Britain have trade deals with PRC pending; they should think again. 3/22
Is there an outbreak in Xinjiang? Not reported. And Uyghurs are only one component of Xinjiang’s population. So Uyghurs are forbidden for a different reason.
There seems to be a blanket prohibition on Uyghurs at public and tourist sites across China. I recently heard a cab driver say that Uyghurs are not allowed to visit 3 Gorges Dam—“it’s said they cause trouble 据说他们作乱 “ was his reason.
Link above is archived version of a letter sent to Brandeis Chinese students by the Chinese Students and Scholars Association. It says the event would disrespect Chinese people (forgetting the Uyghurs are also Chinese people?) and that critical academic events are inappropriate.
There's a template in English at the bottom for letters to be sent to Brandeis president and, interestingly, to the University Office of Diversity, Equity and Inclusion. Indeed, those offices received these letters, but of course did not cancel the event as the letters asked.
Some too-loose writing by @nyt@KatherineKornei about early horse riding in Xinjiang. Mistake is saying that Xinjiang in 350 BCE was "China": it wasn't politically, and it wasn't culturally. (Thread) nytimes.com/2020/11/13/sci…
Story says scientists found "oldest direct evidence of horseback riding in China" and implies this is riding by Chinese or proto Chinese, in contrast to "neighboring civilization" in Mongolia. But western boundaries of Zhou and Qin empire were some 1700 km east of these burials.
People in Shirenzigou and Xigou were "neighboring" proto-China too, just like Mongolia was. So these were not Chinese horse burials, but burials found in PRC. Abstract in Proc of the Nat'l Acad of Science @PNASNews makes the same mistake pnas.org/content/early/….
Zoom is at it again. Last summer it cancelled meetings about Tiananmen and Hong Kong. Now it has cancelled university meetings about Palestine (SFSU) and meetings about the cancelation (U Hawaii Manoa) and NYU. mesana.org/advocacy/lette…
A third party service provider simply cannot be allowed to determine content on our campuses. If they say their corporate policies require them to do so, our university policies must require us to cancel our contracts. There are other providers of the same services.
Note that while Zoom is censoring just as it did China-related content last summer, this time there is no excuse of obeying "local laws" from authoritarian countries. The security / accessibility problem in authoritarian countries is a tough question since all providers face it.