Exact experience in subtle form. For eg, entire tree is inside seed in subtle form. The experience will be saved as Samskaras. The way something in a comp is saved as binary digits or something. Similarly our Subtle mind saves the entire experience in such subtle form. +++
Samskara means not the daily life. Experience is direct like through senses and Indirect like through lnference, comparision, apprehension etc. From any type of experience, the subtlemind shifts a bit and has Samskaras inside it. For eg if i saw a pot, my mind will have the +++
These are Samskaras. When we see a similar thing, then the Samskaras which are say in sleep mode, will become Active and give rise to Memory. Memory is the Replication of Experience. Memory is the gross replica of a past experience and Samskaras are the subtle constituents which
Give rise to memory. Memory isn't प्रमा because for प्रमा (specific cognition), the object is required. In Memory, experience of the object has already taken place in the past, memory is just the Replication of that Experience. Which arises through when subtle Samskaras activate
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
This fool is justifying what Jaggi said. He has quoted Brahmavaivarta, I will also show what is given there. No.1 Nobody has said love of Gopis had any form of lust, but there is difference of Shringaar Ras and Vaatsalya Raa, there is nowhere Yashoda has shown desire to be lover
lover of Krishna, Gopis loved Krishna as Husband, Lover, wajted to have Romance with him, there is no lust in Romance. But Yashodaji's love was always of a Mother, she saw Krishna as a child, and Jaggi has alleged many things in 1 video which I will list now +.
1. Krishna never returned 2. Yashoda's love "transformed" from mother to "lover" (in romantic sense) 3. Yashoda was jealous of Radha as she started viewing her as Rival in the supposed "Romantic Love" she "developed". All this nonsense will be countered now.