(ANNOUNCEMENT) PROOF now features as comprehensive a readable-length report on the January 6 insurrection as you'll find. I've minimized links to past PROOF reporting to avoid running afoul of Substack's memory limits.
▪️ Everything in this PROOF report is documented—with major-media sources—elsewhere at PROOF. If you have a subscription, you've probably seen it.
▪️ However—critically—there's also BREAKING NEWS in this report.
▪️ It involves the Trump campaign's involvement in the insurrection.
▪️ A major insurrectionist group—Stop the Steal—has turned on Trump's campaign.
▪️ The group's leader, now in hiding, claims Trump's campaign sabotaged plans for January 6 to make it more likely a riot would occur.
▪️ This remarkable claim appears to be supported by the evidence.
▪️ A wealth of evidence confirms that—at the direction of Trump and his top advisers—alterations were made to grassroots orgs' pre-January 6 plans that all but ensured an attack on the Capitol. We *also* now know that the campaign was in regular contact with the insurrectionists.
▪️ The chief Stop the Steal organizer has now publicly offered to the FBI *and to the public* all of his texts from January 6, which he says include communications with the Trump campaign about Trump's plans for and movements on that day. We will see how or if he follows through.
▪️ These claims being made by multiple Stop the Steal organizers—unlike many of their other ones—are actually *confirmed* by other grassroots organizers with less past baggage. *All* of the organizers confirm a total Trump takeover of the planning and coordination for January 6.
▪️ Major media has so lightly reported the names of the key witnesses in the FBI investigation—focusing instead on just one class of insurrectionist (working- and middle-class paramilitaries) that we haven't heard much about Caroline Wren, Katrina Pierson, or even Kim Guilfoyle.
▪️ The lengthy PROOF article above gives a nearly *comprehensive* list of January 6 insurrection witnesses, itemizing the five classes of insurrectionists, and shows that four of the five classes have thus far been ignored—as well as many key events in the insurrection timeline.
▪️ I wish I could've linked to every existing PROOF report at each appropriate point in the article, but Substack's memory limits don't allow it—they make curatorial journalism harder than it should be sometimes. If you have full access to PROOF, you have seen all these reports.
▪️ My hope—in making this PROOF report public—is that it'll put into the public discourse names that have so far escaped serious, sustained coverage in major media besides the few (here curated) articles they appear in. Names like Anthony Ornato, Maggie Mulvaney, Justin Caporale.
▪️ America should be *astounded* that Alex Jones and Ali Alexander were VIPs at Trump's inciting January 6 speech. That arrested insurrectionist leader Jessica Watkins was *also* a VIP. That top Trump campaign officials texted insurrectionist leaders *during the Capitol attack*.
▪️ With this breaking news, we know why Stone stayed away from the Capitol on January 6. We know, now, about his December 28 summit with Trump at Mar-a-Lago—right before he committed the same crime as Proud Boy Ethan Nordean, publicly raising money for the January 6 insurrection.
▪️ The arrests of paramilitary operators is important. But it's now time for media to catch up to the story, rather than being months behind it, by reporting on the *scores* of other individuals whose names Americans haven't heard but who made the January 6 insurrection possible.
▪️ PROOF compiled this info over nearly 100 articles with 1,200+ major-media links. 60%+ of the articles on PROOF are free; the other 40% are part of the $5 a month subscription (the lowest rate Substack allows). All told, PROOF is now an archive of hundreds of hours of research.
▪️ I'm urging folks to RETWEET the first tweet in this thread because if we can get this free, public article to enough Americans, we can start having a national conversation about how all the reporting on the January 6 insurrection covers only 20% of the story. That must change.
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
MSNBC: Attacker Identified As 25 Year-Old Noah Green of Indiana; Facebook Page Reportedly Identifies Him As Follower of Nation of Islam; Motive for Attack Remains Unknown msnbc.com/msnbc/amp-vide…
(PS) All of the initial reporting on this attack at the Capitol indicated that the attacker was white. There are indications now that that was inaccurate. mediaite.com/crime/breaking…
(NOTE) If Republicans don't understand that *every time* there's a domestic terror attack in DC going forward, the whole country will suspect it's a continuation of the domestic terror movement *still being run* by the head of the GOP, they're living in a goddamned fantasy world.
I'm writing a PROOF article that aims to summarize *everything* about 1/6. Every person responsible. How/why everything happened. So many details Substack might not let me put so many links in one piece. It's harder than I expected. Why didn't I realize it'd be near-impossible?
The seed of this article was an obscure interview I read that seems to explain exactly why 1/6 unfolded as it did and who was responsible. I've never seen it reported on elsewhere. It's like a key that unlocks January 6. I want to tell the story in one article and make it public.
A big part of being a criminal investigator or criminal defense attorney, both jobs I've had, is distinguishing good from bad evidence when the source is generally unreliable. We think good evidence always comes from reliable people. It just doesn't work that way, unfortunately.
Three groups are responsible for January 6. So far just one is being dealt with by DOJ.
🟨 PARAMILITARIES: Proud Boys, Oath Keepers, Three Percenters
🟧 GRASSROOTS: Stop the Steal, Women for America First
🟥 TRUMP CAMPAIGN: Trumps, Guilfoyle, Pierson, Wren, et. al.
Stay tuned.
(PS) The well-sourced writing I'm working on now draws the connections between these three groups—which have started to turn on one another.
Unfortunately, even journalists who have been keeping up with the Proud Boys and Oath Keepers are flying blind on the other two groups.
(PS2) America needs to understand that we are in the *very* early stages of the prosecution of the *first* of *three* classes of GOP persons responsible for the insurrection. I'm impatient, so I plan to show at PROOF, with meticulous sourcing, where all this is headed eventually.
Just wait until anyone who understands math runs the correct numbers. At his current rate of growth, Greenwald will make $2.34 million in his first year—and well over double that his second year.
(PS) The reason Andreeson Horowitz did this is that—unlike many in journalism—they know how to calculate annual income from a growing (not static) concern. When journalists realize the annual income Greenwald is headed for, it will change the conversation. google.com/amp/s/mobile.r…
(PS2) The way the internet works is about to change fundamentally. Greenwald being well on his way to an eight-figure annual income is actually a far bigger signal of where we're headed than anything related to NFTs. I suspect that sometime soon journalists will write that story.
If you want to see the summer 2022 "breaking news" from CNN about a January 5 "war council" at Trump International Hotel that sealed a seditious conspiracy involving then-POTUS Trump, you can wait until next summer or read 40 articles about it now at PROOF Sethabramson.substack.com
PS/ I'm *very* sick of getting things right because I am a hard-working journalist, excellent researcher, and committed to the sort of metajournalism that U.S. journalism needs right now only to have someone else declare what I wrote "breaking news" six months to two years later.
PS2/ When—not if, *when*— the January 5 "war council" becomes major news, and it may be a week from now or 4 years from now for all I know, I'm *100% certain* it will be classified as "breaking news," and not a word will be said about the hundreds of hours I put into it at PROOF.
Watch this special, then read the harrowing COVID-19 chapter of national bestseller Proof of Corruption (Macmillan, 2020)—a chapter drawn from hundreds of major-media sources—then decide if you think CNN should've given a platform to some of these people. cnn.com/2021/03/26/hea…
(MORE) CNN is now reporting as "breaking news" that the pandemic originated in Wuhan in September/October 2019.
Not breaking news: that critical information was included in Proof of Corruption—with proof—when it became a bestseller in September 2020. Media decided to ignore it.