I don't know how many times I told this story before. This is the story of the end of the mighty Kabul Shahis. When Trilochanapala became the king, Mahmud of Ghazni decided to invade the kingdom for another round of plunder.
Trilochanapala anticipated it and asked his father-in-law Tunga, the defacto ruler of Kashmir to help. Tunga marched to Nandana but on hearing the news that the passes are blocked and Mahmud can't cross the Khyber, he returned back. Eventually, Mahmud came.
Trilochanapala sent his son to hold Mahmud as long as he can and went to Kashmir to get an army. Trilochanapala's son Bhimapala, immortalized in history as Nidar Bhim took his stand in Margalla Hills blocking Mahmud's way. A spirited defence it was, Mahmud was stuck for more than
a month. One of the two wings of his army was mauled and he had to send his personal guard to salvage the situation. Finally, Bhimapala understood he can't hold Mahmud anymore and launched a vicious attack on Mahmud's lines to buy time for his army to retreat.
A strong force was sent to hold Nandana and Bhimapala went towards his father. Mahmud's ground intelligence was zero. He marched to the next logical destination - the Shahi capital city of Nandana. Another long siege and Nandana fell amidst much plunder.
Once Nandana is finished, Mahmud decided to raid Kashmir as Bhimapala went off in that direction. But, surprise!! He comes across the main Shahi and Kashmir force under the overall command of Tunga. Trilochanapala asked his father-in-law to avoid a war and wear off Mahmud
but Tunga was a proud man. He refused caution and strategy to a bull-headed fight and lost. And that loss broke his power and costed him his head. Trilochanapala understood where the fight was going and arranged an orderly retreat of the troops he was able to gather.
He lost everything - except his army and his treasure chest. He is suddenly now a king without a kingdom. He marched off in the direction of Siwaliks and carved a kingdom there, with Hastinapur as his capital city. He had trouble with the Raja of Sharwa Chand Rai and
rather than fighting him, sent Bhimapala to him as an emissary for marriage of Bhimapala with the daughter of Chand Rai. Chand Rai was already angry against the Shahis for carving a kingdom out of his kingdom and arrested Bhimapala. Trilochanapala didn't retaliate.
Slowly, Chand Rai understood the rationale and married his daughter to Bhimapala. Now, with his domains extending till Jhelum, Mahmud erupted on mainland India. Chand Rai decided to take a stand but Bhimapala asked him to flee. Mahmud landed up on an empty fort and angry,
he doubled up his pace to catch Chand Rai. After that, he raided Kannauj where the Pratihara king fled on his approach and declared submission. Mathura and other places were taken before he returned back. Now, this is where our dear historians lie.
When Mahmud left, Chandela Vidyadhara attacked Pratihara Rajyapala and killed him for fleeing in the face of a battle. An angry Mahmud decided to punish Vidyadhara for insulting him - this is what our historians wrote. But, what happened?
Mahmud received intelligence of a counter invasion towards Indus from Ganga plains and decided to act before the invasion took shape. But, he didn't know who was leading it and why. The fact is that Trilochanapala approached Vidyadhara for help to invade Mahmud's territories.
Sharwa and Kashmir will anyways join. It's just a matter of conjecture what would have happened had the invasion took place. Anyways. Mahmud advanced towards Ganga, but had to face severe resistance near Jhelum by a governor of Trilochanapala.
He still didn't know whom he is fighting. Surprise!! When he reaches Ganga area, he comes to know it's Trilochanapala, the Shahi who fought him for more than a decade!! But, Trilochanapala was not ready to give him a war. He was just marching away -
other words, fleeing Mahmud and Mahmud was chasing him. Suddenly, Trilochanapala stopped and offered battle. In the battle, he was severely injured and died. His family was captured. Muslim writers mention he died in a riot in the camp after the defeat but its more probable that
he died of his battle wounds. It's more logical as you would see later. Because the king was injured and his men were desperate to cart him away, it's possible that less attention was paid to his family leading to their caputre. They were honourably returned later.
But, why did Trilochanapala flee first and stop suddenly? He didn't flee. He was drawing Mahmud towards Vidyadhara's main force. Some Muslim chronicler writes Vidyadhara was waiting with more than a lakh troops and 640 elephants.
Sad part is Trilochanapala died but he achieved his aim. Mahmud is clueless where he is, his supply lines are severely extended and he is facing an enemy who can crush him in a way that not even rumours of his death will reach his home!!
Quickly, he concluded peace with Vidyadhara and fled home. Trilochanapala died but he achieved something which no one ever achieved in Indian history either before him or after - a confederacy for a cause. Yes. It was the same confederacy which made Mahmud flee back home through
the desert after pillaging Somnath. And it was the same confederacy which crushed his nephew Salar Masud and pushed back the Muslims across Indus again for the next 150 years. Do we remember such a person? One more thing.
We learn that some desert tribe ambushed Mahmud in the desert on his way back from Somnath. Any guesses why he swore revenge and came back? Because it was the Shahi Bhimapala who attacked him and almost killed him, not some random opportunist!! Those accursed Shahis.
They plugged Khyber Pass from Islam for 350 years and even after they lost everything including their kingdom, they never stopped in their attempts to stop those Muslims from pouring through the Khyber. Why wouldn't Mahmud be angry at those who never stopped whatever
he threw against him? Bhimadeva Shahi, Jayapaladeva, Anandapala, Trilochanapala and Bhimapala are the names we Indians are never supposed to forget, and cherish what they did every day. *Finis*

• • •

Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to force a refresh
 

Keep Current with Eztainutlacatl

Eztainutlacatl Profile picture

Stay in touch and get notified when new unrolls are available from this author!

Read all threads

This Thread may be Removed Anytime!

PDF

Twitter may remove this content at anytime! Save it as PDF for later use!

Try unrolling a thread yourself!

how to unroll video
  1. Follow @ThreadReaderApp to mention us!

  2. From a Twitter thread mention us with a keyword "unroll"
@threadreaderapp unroll

Practice here first or read more on our help page!

More from @cbkwgl

3 Apr
Afonso de Albuquerque, during the Portuguese conquest of Malacca writes to his king that he seized a map from a Javanese pilot near Malacca. The map had details of areas almost till Antarctica(1000 km south of Tasmania) and even parts of Americas.
This begs one to pose a much bigger question. What do we know of the sea exploits of these thalassocracies, especially Srivijaya, Mataram and Majapahit, and the Indians, Chinese and Japanese. Clearly, their achievements are not mean -
Srivijaya invaded Zanzibar and populated Madagascar, Maldives is as good as a part of India, Chandravasi is the name for the Papuan Bird of Paradise in Indonesian. There are hints, but do we have information?
Read 15 tweets
2 Apr
All I say is this. A secular government has no business with temples. And if freeing temples is a tricky subject, I would want governments to extend HRCE laws to all religions and cap govt expenses to a percentage of what govt gets from that religion.
In two words, if govts see fleecing and running down Hindu temples as a source of income, the same should be applicable to every religion and in the same proportion. No ifs and buts.
If Tirumala Temple lost 5000+ sqkm of area, why shouldn't a church face the same? If Muslims can contract temple lands, why shouldnt Hindus get rights over Waqf lands? When priests get as less as 100 rupees per month and are sacked for taking a Dakshina of 15 rupees,
Read 4 tweets
1 Apr
Vairagya always killed kingdoms. Rome collapsed never to rise again because they preferred to be monks than soldiers after the kingdom converted to Christianity. Kalinga ended 40 years after Chaitanya made a saint out of it's warrior king.
Majapahit almost collapsed - the Queen who is supposed to take charge became a Bhikshu. An Uyghur king refused to convert to Buddhism by saying Buddhism teaches compassion and a king can't afford to be compassionate. His descendants converted to Islam.
In fact, even the Christian prayer cults in India are derived from Hindu Bhakti cults prevalent in the Tamil country. In two words, Vairagya at the age of Vanaprastha never helped anyone. And the only one who recognized that is Yeshe O who built the Tibetan Warrior Monk Guilds.
Read 6 tweets
24 Mar
There are very few events in the world which mark a tectonic shift in narrative - and generally, we don't know about most of them. Let me take one such - French Conquest of Algeria. Why is it special? It is probably the first time after Crusades
(ignore Russia's Caucasus and Central Asian exploits) that a Christian Country invaded a Muslim country and tried to annex it to it's home territory. Colonization of Muslim territories were there as like in Philippines or in Indonesia but it was just a distant army using locals
to run the show. Now, back to Algeria. Algeirs is one of the main seats of Barbary Pirates who feasted on European shipping - in fact, even as late as 1800, USA had to shell out 20% of it's annual income as protection money!!
Read 31 tweets
23 Mar
If you want to learn about any warmonger who went broke, read deeply about Ordu Khan's Turkey. It is applicable to any country all history. Turkey, today, is caught in a vicious cycle of funding wars to hide domestic failures and wars bankrupting economy.
cnbctv18.com/market/currenc…
Ordu Khan's popularity is flailing and when his party lost Istanbul and Ankara, and when his planted coup had not many takers, he had no option but to extend his wars. Like a squeezed octopus whose hands are thrashing everywhere, Turkey jumped from theatre to theatre cluelessly -
Greece, Syria, Libya, Armenia and what not. It tried everything except Ordu Khan holding Zulfiqar in his hands and proclaiming a religious war. But then, where is the money? Even the greatest Empire in world history, the British Empire collapsed because of the Second World War.
Read 9 tweets
13 Mar
Looking into the history of Mizos. Know what? There is nothing called a Mizo. In fact, there is nothing even called Lushai. What we have is something called Lushei - a tribe on an alliance of six closely coupled tribes claiming descent from Thangula, who is dated to early 1700s.
Paihte say Thangula is born out of a bastard son of a Paihte chief, the Lushei claim he is born out of a Burmese man and a Paihte woman - in either case, the verdict seems to be that they spliced off from the Paihte. In fact, all the tribes from Manipur to Chittagong to Arakan
(except the Chakma) came from the same stock. Anyways. These six tribes expanded out of their core territory causing much disturbance. But, there is one thing to note here. The North of them are the powerful Thados and Paihte, the South of them are Chakmas and to the East, Chin.
Read 14 tweets

Did Thread Reader help you today?

Support us! We are indie developers!


This site is made by just two indie developers on a laptop doing marketing, support and development! Read more about the story.

Become a Premium Member ($3/month or $30/year) and get exclusive features!

Become Premium

Too expensive? Make a small donation by buying us coffee ($5) or help with server cost ($10)

Donate via Paypal Become our Patreon

Thank you for your support!

Follow Us on Twitter!