A group of Jewish students at Butler have written a letter on Angela Davis's deplatforming. Crucially, they insist that no Jewish student played any role in the decision to postpone the event. Not sure how they can know that, but it's what they say.
HOWEVER, they do seem to imply that they, the authors, complained to the student government about its decision to co-sponsor and fund the event. Since those complaints could easily have been the cause of the postponement, I'm not sure how their initial claim makes sense.
So there are still some outstanding questions about what happened.
The rest of the letter is a kind of special pleading we often see when national media targets students for snowflakery. "I'm being mocked online, I'm being bombarded with verbal abuse, this is hate speech," etc.
I read A LOT of stories like this, so believe when I say that this response is fairly typical. And I believe them. I sympathize with them. No matter what they did, they don't deserve the sort of snide mockery they're no doubt currently receiving. It's cruel and it's unfair.
But reader, it rankles to see people who are normally so quick to dismiss this sort of special pleading suddenly discover in it something noble.
This proposed ban on "divisive concepts" in Louisiana is by far the most sweeping bill to date. Everything is included. Public AND private, K-12 AND higher ed. It's all targeted for censorship.
With one exception: charter schools. Here you can really see the synergy between the anti-CRT/Woke crowd and the charter school movement. It's an increasingly common partnership.
As for the "divisive concepts" themselves, they're largely the same as the other bills floating around (and before that, Trump's EO), but there are few interesting additions I haven't come across before.
I’m going to actually agree with @mattyglesias here. Not necessarily about the HoC debate, which I don’t know much about, but his point about how an unwillingness to discuss certain issues in progressive places will often hurt the Left. That’s obviously right.
That’s one reason why while I talk a lot a about rightwing threats to free speech, I reject the idea that it is therefore the “real” threat. Regardless of the merits, that framing just serves as an excuse for the Left to ignore its own problems. It’s an alibi, not an analysis.
It’s also why I was somewhat uncomfortable with @OsitaNwanevu’s response to Yglesias yesterday about how only the GOP is trying to pass laws banning campus speech, not Dems. That is a) not true, eg many state-level Dems have supported anti-BDS bills; and b) risks excusing how...
What is anti-Semitism? The only true answer is the Augustinian one: If no one asks me, I know. If you do ask, etc. and so forth.
BUT! Two new definitions of the term have recently been released, each meant to serve as alternatives to or elaborations on the IHRA.
The first is called the Nexus Document. It's meant to flesh out the possible relationship between anti-Semitism and anti-Zionism, clearing up some of the well-known censorious ambiguities in the IHRA.
A Tennessee rep has introduced a bill that would prohibit public schools from using any textbooks or instructional materials that "promote, normalize, support, or address lesbian, gay, bi-sexual, or transgender issues or lifestyle."
The bill is necessary, its sponsor says, because such material offends "a significant portion of students, parents, and Tennessee residents with Christian values."
Meanwhile, an old fashioned book purge is taking place right now in @LeanderISD, a school district north of Austin.
This WSJ editorial on California's Ethnic Studies curriculum is incredibly misleading. I'll explain why in a moment, but first I want to really drive home the torrent of bullshit that critics are directing against the ESMC.
First, a bit of context. What's being debated right now is the 3rd and final draft of the ESMC. Most of it is boilerplate edu-bureaucrat-ese: This is what ethnic studies is, this is why it's important, this is how we might implement it, etc.
The firestorm is all over the contents of Appendix A. That's where you'll find 43 sample lesson plans that schools can adopt to satisfy the ethnic studies requirement. I want to stress that they're just samples. Individual schools are permitted to ignore them if they wish.
This is an amazing article and today's must-read piece on higher ed. @EmmaJanePettit is killing it over at CHE. But she can't do it alone. I am once again imploring journalists working the campus free speech beat to start taking this stuff seriously.
Northern Idaho College has about 4,300 students, roughly twice the size of Oberlin. And their board of trustees is currently run by a collection of madmen.
I'm kind of at my wits' end. There are journalists working this beat who have flat-out claimed that nobody believes the profs-are-indoctrinating-students theory. But this stuff is canon on the Right. Look what happens when it goes unchecked.