Rajan is right to question "the notion that industrial countries can allow their sovereign debt to grow indefinitely". One of the many ways to misunderstand MMT is to believe that boosting domestic-currency government debt doesn't matter.


But it does indeed matter – beyond some level a higher debt burden can raise real costs for the economy, increase volatility, and reduce balance-sheet flexibility. But because I think the global economy is demand constrained, and not supply constrained, I am less worried...

than Rajan about the debt impact of "badly designed handouts".

What matters is not a nominal increase in the debt but rather an increase relative to the real debt-servicing capacity of the economy, for which GDP is a proxy, and to the extent that these handouts are...

spent on consumption, by increasing demand they should cause businesses to invest in expanding production. In that case the resulting increase in debt will be matched by an increase in GDP, and there will be no worsening of the US debt burden.

Rajan also worries that a lot of the spending will go to households who save rather than spend the money. That certainly will reduce the effectiveness of the spending programs, but this is a problem that can only really be resolved by redistribution through the tax system.

• • •

Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to force a refresh

Keep Current with Michael Pettis

Michael Pettis Profile picture

Stay in touch and get notified when new unrolls are available from this author!

Read all threads

This Thread may be Removed Anytime!


Twitter may remove this content at anytime! Save it as PDF for later use!

Try unrolling a thread yourself!

how to unroll video
  1. Follow @ThreadReaderApp to mention us!

  2. From a Twitter thread mention us with a keyword "unroll"
@threadreaderapp unroll

Practice here first or read more on our help page!

More from @michaelxpettis

6 Apr

Very interesting piece by @Birdyword on some of the ways property developers like Evergrande manage debt, partly by replacing debt-like instruments that are classified as debt with debt-like instruments that are not technically classified as debt.


We've seen similar things many times before, for example when local governments replaced their direct borrowings, which showed up as local government debt, with borrowing through SPVs, which didn't. Anyone very familiar with the history of these borrowing frenzies knows...

that in the late bubble stages not only do we usually get financial "innovation" that allows borrowers to reclassify or disguise what is still fundamentally debt (remember the Greek loan disguised as a currency swap?), but worse, these structures often highly...
Read 7 tweets
4 Apr

Although engineers in democracies may look longingly at the ability of authoritarian governments to force through major infrastructure projects, it is a mistake to think that this is the important difference between...


infrastructure building in China and the US. The checks and balances in democratic systems may reduce efficiency, but they are better at long-term adjustment, and so the differences reflect little more than the standard trade-offs between the two systems.

What really matters is the relationship between desired and actual investment. In the early 1990s, when it really began its infrastructure-building spree, after five decades of war and Maoism China was hugely underinvested in infrastructure for its level of development.
Read 12 tweets
3 Apr

Interesting and important article by @KeithBradsher about new rules that limit how much money foreign banks can transfer into China from overseas and that require them to tighten their balance sheets. While some see these measures as designed...


to limit the ability of foreign banks to operate in China, I suspect they have much more to do with worries about the impact of foreign financial institutions on domestic financial stability.

That is why I disagree with those who propose that measures like these...

are likely soon to be reversed as China continues opening up. As I have long argued, in spite of its extremely fragile financial balance sheets, China was never likely to have a financial crisis in part because as long as its banking system was closed it could easily...
Read 4 tweets
3 Apr

By now it should be pretty clear how much of a problem debt is in China, how much risk there is embedded in the financial system, and just how worried the regulators are. We should have been able to see this well over...


a decade ago, but economists are not very good at understanding the dynamics of debt and how balance sheet structures condition economic behavior. It is only once debt has become unmanageable that we begin to worry that we may have a a problem with debt.

For the same reasons what seems to be much less clear to most analysts is the relationship between these risks and the underlying performance of the Chinese economy. The problems of soaring debt and increasing financial fragility are not just incidental, in other words.
Read 6 tweets
3 Apr

While Rogoff is right that a large economy like that of China's should have independent monetary policy, in which case its currency should not be managed against other currencies, it is unlikely that Beijing will let the currency float freely until...

it has substantially cleaned up and reformed its banking system, something that could take decades at best.

Given China's extremely high debt levels and the economy's reliance on soaring debt for growth, the insolvency of the banking system, and the structural inability...

of the banks to make economic decisions, Beijing has been extremely reluctant to risk administering any shock to the economy, or even to reduce its control over the financial system – in fact many would argue that in recent years Beijing has actually increased its control...
Read 7 tweets
1 Apr

This article has been pretty widely circulated, which is why I want to point out why I disagree with it. It complains that by creating demand for commodities, China’s investment binge is making Joe Biden's infrastructure investment program more...


expensive, and that, to make matters worse, Beijing has been very cleverly racing ahead of the US by stocking up on commodities last year when it didn't yet need them.

But aside from the fact that China’s investment binge is no more making Joe Biden's stimulus more ...

expensive than Joe Biden's stimulus is making China's investment binge more expensive, it isn't really true. In fact Chinese investment surged last year, accounting for nearly 200% of the country's GDP growth. This is the main reason China bought large amounts of...
Read 8 tweets

Did Thread Reader help you today?

Support us! We are indie developers!

This site is made by just two indie developers on a laptop doing marketing, support and development! Read more about the story.

Become a Premium Member ($3/month or $30/year) and get exclusive features!

Become Premium

Too expensive? Make a small donation by buying us coffee ($5) or help with server cost ($10)

Donate via Paypal Become our Patreon

Thank you for your support!

Follow Us on Twitter!