Share this page!

Francis Hoar Profile picture
Twitter logo
5 Apr, 5 tweets, 2 min read
‘Social distancing’ is a made up measure that featured in no pandemic planning&whose efficacy has never been tested. It is entirely reliant on the lie that asymptomatic transmission is a major driver of infection.
This has nothing to with the virus & everything to do with control
And there is no evidence from any country that mask mandates have had any effect on the rate of transmission. Anywhere.
‘There’s a chance.’ What a wonderful approach to public policy. We should put you in SAGE.

https://t.co/FGSlmJksP4
And this. Blindingly obvious and yet still protests must be ‘risk assessed’ and we go through the pathetic theatre of ‘social’ distancing even outside.
https://t.co/p3ar9YMa0V
‘Even if there is some asymptomatic transmission, asymptomatic transmission has never been the driver of outbreaks.’
Thank you, Dr Fauci. Pity you let this infinitesimal risk drive your entire dystopian policy.
https://t.co/7StuFah9TY

• • •

Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to force a refresh
　

Keep Current with Francis Hoar

Francis Hoar Profile picture

Stay in touch and get notified when new unrolls are available from this author!

Read all threads

This Thread may be Removed Anytime!

PDF

Twitter may remove this content at anytime! Save it as PDF for later use!

Try unrolling a thread yourself!

how to unroll video
  1. Follow @ThreadReaderApp to mention us!

  2. From a Twitter thread mention us with a keyword "unroll"
@threadreaderapp unroll

Practice here first or read more on our help page!

More from @Francis_Hoar

Francis Hoar Profile picture
5 Apr
Why don’t you - or the @BBCNews that made the show - question him about the abysmal standards in the laboratories exposed by Panorama, risking the contamination of numerous samples by ‘fragments’ of viral matter?
Or that PCR tests, at 45 cycles, have numerous false positives?
Even Fauci said that anything over 35 does not pick up live viral matter but the remnants of a virus that was - but is no longer - infectious. Yet this issue is never examined by those whose duty it is to scrutinise the government.
And the expansion of testing and engagement of numerous poorly trained staff at labs that don’t give a damn about accuracy will inevitably exacerbate both (a) the proportion of ‘positives’ of ppl who were but are no longer infectious and (b) the number of contaminated results.
Read 6 tweets
Francis Hoar Profile picture
4 Apr
Liar, @nadhimzahawi. Liar.
https://t.co/ussvY6fmi2
https://t.co/qIXvJeWrFz
Read 4 tweets
Francis Hoar Profile picture
31 Mar
Thank you for this challenge.

The reality is that this this is not because of measures but because people generally don’t go to the pub when ill (especially now) and that there is no reliable evidence for asymptomatic transmission.

Ie, this was all for nothing.
Read 4 tweets
Francis Hoar Profile picture
23 Mar
‘Three weeks to flatten the curve!’

“”Happy”” #lockdownanniversary
(Which it actually isn’t as, in another act of flagrant dishonesty, the government announced lockdowns laws had effect three days before they actuality did.)
150 million people worldwide will go into extreme poverty - that is, risk of starvation - because of the destruction of the economy caused by restricting supply chains. In the last pandemics - 57 & 69 - the economy grew. That isn’t caused by the pandemic.
Read 4 tweets
Francis Hoar Profile picture
22 Mar
This is a gross abuse of power. There is no power in s 45C of the Public Order Act (which provides for *domestic* regulations) to prevent *anyone* from leaving the country. Section 45B applies directly to international travel and only restricts *entry*.
Public HEALTH Act. Sorry
Which is another consideration of statutory interpretation, Parliament being presumed (when amending the Public HEALTH Act in 2008) to pass law in conformity with its international obligations.

Read 5 tweets
Francis Hoar Profile picture
21 Mar
There is no reliable evidence for the efficacy of the invented measure of ‘social distancing’. There cannot be: it was not contemplated by any pandemic plan before last year before it was plucked from nowhere and imposed (effectively) without debate or even legislation.
But imposed it was through other - statutory - measures such as licensing laws.
No evidence of efficacy. No precedent. No debate.
Yet to question it is to meet with howls of outrage from the baying mob.
I continue to be flabbergasted by the unthinking acceptance of such impositions of the state without evidential or logical justification-let alone any assessment of their proportionality-by supposedly learned people. Including Her Majesty's Counsel and judiciary.
Read 4 tweets

Did Thread Reader help you today?

Support us! We are indie developers!

This site is made by just two indie developers on a laptop doing marketing, support and development! Read more about the story.

Become a Premium Member ($3/month or $30/year) and get exclusive features!

Become Premium

Too expensive? Make a small donation by buying us coffee ($5) or help with server cost ($10)

Donate via Paypal Become our Patreon

Thank you for your support!

Follow Us on Twitter!

Like this author's thread?

Get emails when @Francis_Hoar has new unrolls!

Check out other threads from @Francis_Hoar!

Read all threads by @Francis_Hoar