korpi Profile picture
5 Apr, 19 tweets, 7 min read
1) It's been a while since my last bullish thread on $BNT but @Bancor Team keeps building and it deserves some commentary. Let's talk about a new addition to $BNT tokenomics, Vortex Burner, which puts deflationary pressure on circulating supply of $BNT.
2) Let's start with a quick reminder how @Bancor works. In contrast to other AMMs like $UNI or $SUSHI, in Bancor, you can provide liquidity with a single token. You don't have to pool your token with other asset which often leads to impermanent loss (IL).
3) Whitelisted pools in Bancor are fully protected from IL. It works by bundling an array of pools into one bucket. Some pools have high IL, others don't and fees they generate are used for IL compensation. It shifts IL from single-pool risk to a risk spread across many pools.
4) Single-sided liquidity, IL protection and liquidity mining rewards are the features which attract a lot of liquidity into @Bancor. TVL has been growing consistently since they were introduced a few months ago and it's approaching $2B mark. Image
5) Higher TVL means that bigger trades can be executed with low slippage which attracts more volume and generates more fees for liquidity providers (LP). This is true for all AMMs. But what's quite unique about @Bancor is the fact that around half of LPs are $BNT holders.
6) So 50% of total fees paid by traders goes to $BNT holders while it's only 16% for $SUSHI and 0% for $UNI holders. This is a great example how @Bancor protocol success is aligned with $BNT token holders. Something that can't be told about many other governance tokens.
7) Vortex Burner is a further improvement to $BNT token model (as if it wasn't good enough!). It's designed to:
- Increase locked $BNT liquidity.
- Reduce circulating supply of $BNT.
- Increase lending capacity for $BNT LPs.

Let's ELI5.
8) When you provide $BNT to @Bancor pool, you get vBNT in return. It represents your stake in the protocol which consists of underlying $BNT plus accrued swap fees. Both can be redeemed when you send the same amount of vBNT back to the pool.
9) You may also decide to sell your vBNT for other token in Bancor (e.g. $LINK or $ROOK). It's done via vBNT/BNT pool, called Bancor Vortex. Purchased tokens can be used to earn more yield by providing additional liquidity on Bancor or by using them in other DeFi protocol. Image
10) But selling vBNT removes the option to unstake the associated $BNT stake. To get back your staked $BNT, you will need to buy back vBNT. In other words, you are making a bet that you will earn enough to get the same amount of vBNT in future and keep some profit on top of it.
11) Notice that if 1 vBNT > 1 $BNT, arb opportunity exists. You can buy BNT, stake it, get vBNT and sell it for more BNT. So vBNT/BNT has an effective ceiling at 1 vBNT = 1 BNT. If you sell vBNT for 1 BNT, you are almost guaranteed to buy it back at lower price in future.
12) The lower vBNT/BNT rate is, the more room to climb vBNT has, therefore, the higher the risk that you will have to buy back vBNT at higher price in future. So vBNT/BNT rate determines the borrowing risk at any given time. The higher the rate, the lower the risk.
13) So what is Vortex Burner? It collects an adjustable fee (5% atm) from swap revenue generated by LPs and uses it to buy and burn vBNT. For example, if a $100k trade is executed on a pool with a 0.2% fee, 200$ is collected by LPs. 5% of this fee (10$) buys vBNT and burns it.
14) Remember that vBNT represents $BNT staked in the protocol? Burning vBNT means this $BNT is permanently locked now. So portion of every swap increases locked liquidity in @Bancor. It reinforces liquidity - volume feedback loop which is extremely healthy for the protocol.
15) But $BNT locked in the protocol also means that it's removed from the circulating supply. In other words, every swap in @Bancor puts a deflationary pressure on the circulating supply of $BNT! I don't have to explain how good it is for every $BNT token holder.
16) Continuous upward pressure on the vBNT price also increases lending capacity of Bancor Vortex. When vBNT/BNT rate goes up, the borrowing risk for users who want to leverage their staked $BNT decreases - another benefit for $BNT liquidity providers.
17) $BNT token has always been in the center of @Bancor. Its utility as "liquidity bridge" between all the tokens allows $BNT token holders to be fully aligned with the growth of the protocol. Vortex Burner improves this design even further.
18) With Vortex Burner, trading volume on Bancor directly translates into more locked liquidity in the protocol and deflationary pressure on $BNT circulating supply. Sometimes you like the project but you are not bullish on its token. You definitely can't say this about @Bancor.
Full article on Vortex Burner can be found here: blog.bancor.network/vbnt-burning-i…

• • •

Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to force a refresh
 

Keep Current with korpi

korpi Profile picture

Stay in touch and get notified when new unrolls are available from this author!

Read all threads

This Thread may be Removed Anytime!

PDF

Twitter may remove this content at anytime! Save it as PDF for later use!

Try unrolling a thread yourself!

how to unroll video
  1. Follow @ThreadReaderApp to mention us!

  2. From a Twitter thread mention us with a keyword "unroll"
@threadreaderapp unroll

Practice here first or read more on our help page!

More from @korpi87

27 Mar
1) I really like experiments. Especially the ones which can disrupt what we are currently used to. DeFi is the best example - an attempt to disrupt TradFi with a code. AMMs are already disrupting centralized exchanges and constantly evolve. What about the final form of AMM?
2) This is what @IntegralHQ tries to achieve - the final form of AMM, the one that eats other exchanges' liquidity. Sounds like a dream, doesn't it? So let's dive into it deeper. It's complex and I won't pretend I fully understand all the technical docs but I'll try to ELI5.
3) How will @IntegralHQ suck in all the liquidity? Technically it won't. But it will act as if it would have. This is due to its unique combination of AMM with orderbook (OB-AMM design). It allows them to mirror liquidity from other exchanges to become the cheapest one to trade.
Read 24 tweets
24 Mar
1) While I, as active liquidity provider, am excited about sophisticated options for LPs in $UNI v3, I'm also concerned that too much complexity will only serve few in the know and leave the majority of (passive) LPs behind.
2) Although I haven't conducted a survey to justify my thesis, I'm quite convinced that the majority of current LPs don't actively manage their pools. This is based on my observations and pushed me to share a set of "advanced" strategies for active LPs:
3) Uni v3 feature to provide liquidity only for a given range (+ other options) will be useful for professional market makers who will likely eat lunch of passive LPs. If passive LPs earn less, they may look for alternative simple solutions.
Read 8 tweets
18 Mar
1) What is the most popular term in DeFi which you have never heard of in traditional world? Probably aping but let's assume it's impermanent loss (IL). Every liquidity provider in AMM suffered from IL. But do you know that you can beat it? Read this thread to find out how.
2) Let's start with a quick definition of IL. It's a difference in value between your current assets in liquidity pool (LP) and assets you would have if you hadn't added them to LP. In other words:

IL = current assets at current prices - initial assets at current prices
3) Why current assets are different than initial assets? Because this is how AMM works - each trade changes the amount of both tokens (x and y) in LP so that their product remains constant (x*y=k). It's like automatic rebalancing of your portfolio consisting of tokens x and y.
Read 26 tweets
13 Mar
1) If you don't like reading long blog posts with project updates but prefer to get a bullish thread with a summary of news pumping your favourite token, I'm here to serve. It's $BNT time again after the March release of Bancor Progress Update. blog.bancor.network/bancor-progres…
2) "In the last month, the total value locked in the Bancor Protocol has more than doubled, exceeding $1.6 billion. Bancor broke into the top 10 projects by TVL and now generates the fifth highest revenue of any protocol on Ethereum." - no commentary is needed - bullish $BNT.
3) $BNT circulating supply reported by CoinGecko & CoinMarketCap is overstated. When you deposit single-sided liquidity, @Bancor mints BNT into the pool to match it. This BNT is protocol-owned, largely remains in the pool earning fees and is eventually burned.
Read 19 tweets
6 Mar
1) Although in a bull market narratives drive prices more than fundamentals, it's always wise to look at your portfolio from a bear market perspective and pay attention to traditional valuation metrics adapted to DeFi. @tokenterminal is a place to go. Let's play a bit with AMMs.
2) The most common metric used to compare protocols is Price to Sales ratio (P/S). It's a relation of a protocol's market cap to its revenue so it indicates how the market values the asset relative to its revenue and expectation of future growth.
3) In terms of AMMs revenue represents total fees paid by traders to liquidity providers. In other words it's the amount users are willing to pay to use the protocol. For better comparison market cap is fully diluted (FDV), i.e. it assumes all tokens are in circulation.
Read 14 tweets
1 Mar
1) I've been trying to raise awareness of superior @Bancor dex for some time but my reach on Twitter is so low that I literally twitted for myself with the aim to quote it when market realises I was right. I think this time has come.
2) In my opinion @Bancor is the most innovative AMM on the market and $BNT is substantially undervalued. The core features include:
- Single-sided liquidity (you can add liquidity for your token only)
- Impermanent loss protection
- Low trading fees (0.2% vs 0.6% on Uni or Sushi)
3) More features are coming:
- Leveraged liquidity on staked $BNT (borrow against staked $BNT for better capital efficiency)
- Layer 2 on Arbitrum for faster and cheaper transactions
- Cross-chain bridge to Polkadot & other chains
Read 25 tweets

Did Thread Reader help you today?

Support us! We are indie developers!


This site is made by just two indie developers on a laptop doing marketing, support and development! Read more about the story.

Become a Premium Member ($3/month or $30/year) and get exclusive features!

Become Premium

Too expensive? Make a small donation by buying us coffee ($5) or help with server cost ($10)

Donate via Paypal Become our Patreon

Thank you for your support!

Follow Us on Twitter!