Share this page!

Katie Mack Profile picture
Twitter logo
6 Apr, 3 tweets, 1 min read
Great video featuring @MichaelDTubbs and the fantastically successful guaranteed income pilot program he implemented in Stockton, California. $500/month helped recipients in the program get better jobs, come out of depression, and make their lives better.
An important point in the video is how removing financial precariousness allows people to take risks and make investments in their future. Basic survival uncertainty makes it impossible to make the kinds of bold moves that allow innovation and progress; it’s self-reinforcing.
Every time universal basic income comes up there's a panic that it'll make people stop working -- the actual research shows the opposite. Bringing people out of crushing poverty helps them get their lives in order enough to get and keep jobs, or find (or create) better ones.

• • •

Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to force a refresh
　

Keep Current with Katie Mack

Katie Mack Profile picture

Stay in touch and get notified when new unrolls are available from this author!

Read all threads

This Thread may be Removed Anytime!

PDF

Twitter may remove this content at anytime! Save it as PDF for later use!

Try unrolling a thread yourself!

how to unroll video
  1. Follow @ThreadReaderApp to mention us!

  2. From a Twitter thread mention us with a keyword "unroll"
@threadreaderapp unroll

Practice here first or read more on our help page!

More from @AstroKatie

Katie Mack Profile picture
7 Apr
I've been tweeting a bunch of articles and threads about the #gminus2 result -- a possible indication of ✨ NEW PHYSICS ✨ coming from @Fermilab! Check my timeline for details, but I'll give a very brief and simplified summary here...
An experiment at @Fermilab is measuring a property of muons -- subatomic particles similar to electrons, but heavier -- to try to determine if our current understanding of particle physics is correct or not. The experiment hinges on the fact that muons are a tiny bit magnetic 🧲
The "Muon g-2" experiment measures how muons spin around and how that spin wobbles when they're sent around a circular track in the presence of strong magnetic and electric fields. That depends on how the muon spins and its "g-factor", related to its magnetism.
Read 11 tweets
Katie Mack Profile picture
8 Mar
New guidelines from the CDC for what might be okay for fully vaccinated people: cdc.gov/coronavirus/20…

Note: Dr. @RWalensky emphasized during the White House press conference that this is the best guidance RIGHT NOW but may change as conditions change and the science develops.
New CDC guidance:

"Fully vaccinated" (FV) = at least 2 weeks after final vaccine dose

* FV people can hang out in small groups with each other without masks

* FV people can hang out in small groups with LOW RISK unvaccinated people

* Non-essential travel still discouraged
The reason they're not saying fully vaccinated people can "just go out and do whatever" is partly because vaccines aren't 100% effective and partly because being vaccinated might not always prevent you from carrying the disease to others. (This is still being studied.)
Read 4 tweets
Katie Mack Profile picture
5 Mar
This is an amazing optical illusion — caused by atmospheric conditions over the water bending light rays to make it look like the ship is above it. This video has a nice explanation (especially the bit starting around 1:20) . #FataMorgana
The proper term for this is “superior mirage” or “superior looming mirage” but I have seen the term “fata morgana” used for a similar phenomenon also caused by weird kinds of light bending over the ocean.
More on superior mirages from @iansample. theguardian.com/science/2021/m…

Rather than "optical illusion" it might be better to call this an "optics illusion." Your brain is processing visual information correctly, it's just that the light deflection makes that information unreliable!
Read 5 tweets
Katie Mack Profile picture
4 Mar
Here’s a long-ish excerpt from my book where I talk about THE BIG RIP, one possibility for the end of the universe. (More likely is a Heat Death, caused by endless accelerated expansion, which *doesn’t* rip things apart. But a Big Rip would be fun too.) americanscientist.org/article/tearin…
I just saw a clip of Neil deGrasse Tyson on the Late Show saying that the Big Rip is likely coming and that it’s the necessary result of endless accelerated expansion, neither of which is true! So, see above for clarification.
If you’re interested in reading about what cosmologists are discovering now about how the universe might end, check out my book, “The End of Everything (Astrophysically Speaking)”! It’s accessible and comprehensive and has lots of funny footnotes astrokatie.com/book
Read 4 tweets
Katie Mack Profile picture
19 Feb
A thing a lot of people don't seem to be aware of is that the proportion of astronomers who believe there is alien life of some sort in the universe is almost 100%. It's just the proportion who think they've *dropped by* that's almost 0.
I had a radio interview recently where the host started out all challenging saying "It's UNTHINKABLE there isn't other life out there in the cosmos!" and I was like, "yeah, pretty much" and I think he was not really prepared for that
What we know is that we find life in just about every environment we look for it on Earth, wherever there's some amount of liquid water -- sometimes even just ice. And we know there is water on other worlds. And there are a LOT of other worlds. So: life seems likely to be common!
Read 4 tweets
Katie Mack Profile picture
7 Feb
Watching the snow fall outside and thinking about terminal velocity, and how much less peaceful this whole scene would look without air resistance. ❄️💥
Terminal velocity is the final speed something reaches when falling through a fluid (like air). The force of gravity accelerates the thing, and air resistance slows it down (in proportion to the square of the speed), so at some point those things balance and it stops speeding up.
Terminal velocity for a raindrop is around 9 meters/second. For a snowflake it’s generally closer to 2 meters/second, depending on the size and fluffiness of the flake. (Some formulae here hyperphysics.phy-astr.gsu.edu/hbase/airfri2.…)
Read 4 tweets

Did Thread Reader help you today?

Support us! We are indie developers!

This site is made by just two indie developers on a laptop doing marketing, support and development! Read more about the story.

Become a Premium Member ($3/month or $30/year) and get exclusive features!

Become Premium

Too expensive? Make a small donation by buying us coffee ($5) or help with server cost ($10)

Donate via Paypal Become our Patreon

Thank you for your support!

Follow Us on Twitter!

Like this author's thread?

Get emails when @AstroKatie has new unrolls!

Check out other threads from @AstroKatie!

Read all threads by @AstroKatie