SBF Profile picture
6 Apr, 5 tweets, 2 min read
2) This implies:

a) ~$4b run-rate EBITDA
b) ~$7.2b run-rate revenue
c) ~53bps average trading fee (!!!!!) if all comes from transactions
3) So I'm guessing a significant chunk of that revenue is not coming from trading fees, which would be a first.

Either that, or mobile app volume is WAAAAY up as a % of exchange volume.

So far they haven't broken it down.
4) This is an impressive financial statement, and a huge step for the industry.

And kudos to @coinbase for waiting to go public until they were consistently profitable and at least somewhat projectable. That's better than many listings.

And it's a great precedent for crypto.
5) FWIW, FTX likely had:

a) ~5-15% of the revenue
b) ~10-25% of the earnings
c) ~2x the volume
d) way fewer users
e) higher in-quarter growth
f) a bit higher year-on-year growth

(NOT FINANCIAL ADVICE, NOT AUDITED YET, JUST ESTIMATES)

• • •

Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to force a refresh
 

Keep Current with SBF

SBF Profile picture

Stay in touch and get notified when new unrolls are available from this author!

Read all threads

This Thread may be Removed Anytime!

PDF

Twitter may remove this content at anytime! Save it as PDF for later use!

Try unrolling a thread yourself!

how to unroll video
  1. Follow @ThreadReaderApp to mention us!

  2. From a Twitter thread mention us with a keyword "unroll"
@threadreaderapp unroll

Practice here first or read more on our help page!

More from @SBF_Alameda

20 Mar
1) The CFTC fines Coinbase $6.5m.

This might be bullish for Coinbase.

cftc.gov/PressRoom/Pres…
2) NOT INVESTMENT ADVICE. NOT LEGAL ADVICE.
3) On its surface, this looks, well...

I mean idk how bad it is, but it's not _good_.

"Coinbase recklessly delivered false, misleading, or inaccurate reports concerning transactions in digital assets, including Bitcoin, on the GDAX electronic trading platform it operated."
Read 12 tweets
18 Mar
1) A few notes about referrals:

For a while there's been something annoying about FTX referral accounting.

All of the ref fees are paid out, but it often takes a day to do so.

That means that they will sometimes show up in the next day's bucket.
2) Going forward, this should be cleaner; each day's referral fees should correspond exactly to trades that happened on that (previous) day.

This should make it easier to track what's going on.

We're also considering changing the interaction of FTT with fee tier 6.
3) Fee tier is is capped at 3bps taker post-referral; this means if someone was fee tier 6, and had $5k of FTT making their actual fees ~3.5bps, then they would only give ~0.5bps of ref fees.

We're considering changing this to be a 3bp min pre-FTT.
Read 5 tweets
16 Mar
1) What is Oxygen?

oxygen.org
2) I guess I should start by saying what it's not.

@Oxygen_protocol isn't an attempt to make a simple, clean margin trading interface as soon as possible. (@mangomarkets sorta is!)

Oxygen is going down a different route:

what is the most powerful borrow/lending product?
3) And what do we have to do to get there?

It's an approach that mirror's @FTX_Official's launch in some ways.

And perhaps some parts of the design will seem familiar.
Read 14 tweets
16 Mar
1) A graph of latency on FTX over time:
2) As the exchange has grown, latency has too.

Which sucks. Latency is higher than it was 6 months ago.

So, a few weeks ago, we started working on reducing it.
3) We've successfully gotten it down by around 30% from where it was, though still slightly higher than in the summer.

There's more work to go.

We could probably get a factor of ~1.5 improvement over the next month.
Read 4 tweets
15 Mar
1) listening to fivethirtyeight.com/videos/in-marc….

Some thoughts:
2) It paints a really compelling picture for primaries mattering, in terms of campaigns/funding/dynamics.

And that things can be random and contingent.
3) around 20 mins in, they talk about people miss-predicting the primary.

I think what they forgot: 2020 wasn't a random election. It was the election of Trump and COVID.
Read 16 tweets
8 Mar
1) A while ago I wrote a post on Sushiswap:

2) In the end, it wasn't inevitable.

If Nomi hadn't fucked up, maybe SUSHI would be at $100.

If the team hadn't built, maybe it would be at $1.

But it had a shot, because much of what we thought was sacred was in fact chasing yield.
3) There are people whose beliefs in a product or a chain will always dominate other factors.

But most of the people you see using something aren't trying to express their faith. Most people are still searching, and using whatever seems best for them at the time.
Read 16 tweets

Did Thread Reader help you today?

Support us! We are indie developers!


This site is made by just two indie developers on a laptop doing marketing, support and development! Read more about the story.

Become a Premium Member ($3/month or $30/year) and get exclusive features!

Become Premium

Too expensive? Make a small donation by buying us coffee ($5) or help with server cost ($10)

Donate via Paypal Become our Patreon

Thank you for your support!

Follow Us on Twitter!