"Predictably, the killer used a semi-automatic handgun, a type of weapon the vast majority of civilians don’t need and which is far too easy to obtain in this country." nypost.com/2021/04/06/gun…
"The people who moo along with these talking points, which ultimately trace back to the $62 billion gun industry and profit-protecting astroturf lobbies, all seem to be under the impression that their claims are unanswerable."
“'Our Constitution explicitly protects gun ownership.' Sort of. What it protects is the right to keep and bear arms for the purpose of membership in a well-regulated militia."
“'It’s impossible to draft targeted gun-control legislation' is yet another tired favorite of sophists who pretend that the law can’t distinguish between weapons of war designed to inflict terror with their very appearance and hunting rifles because of certain shared features."
"But the one [argument] I suspect most Second Amendment absolutists really want to make is familiar to all parents of toddlers: 'I don’t want you to take my toys away!'"
"To which the answer in many cases is: too bad."
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
The DC Court of Appeals reversed a lower court today when it found that an officer from the city's Gun Recovery Unit did not receive consent before finding a handgun during a warrantless search of the appellant's satchel: dccourts.gov/sites/default/…
"Denton said he was particularly concerned that Hawkins might have a gun because Denton’s unit had 'recovered many firearms' from satchels that summer."
"We just want to make sure everything is cool and nobody has any illegal firearms.”
"But holding that a constitutional right exists while then going on to eviscerate that right is indefensible, and being willing to assume that a constitutional right exists because that assumption makes no difference is arguably worse."
"But if New York has gotten away with suppressing constitutional rights because it has obscured the suppression with discretionary standards, rather than forthright rules, that too is a reason to grant review."
"At the outset, it must be noted that despite being named as a defendant in the caption of the Complaint, there is no actual cause of action alleged against the National Rifle Association of America, Inc."
"Plaintiff’s Complaint contains allegations regarding events that post-date the incident and have no relevance to the incident."
"...that Colt may have sold a model of an AR-15 rifle with a bayonet lug (despite no allegation that the Subject Rifle had a bayonet lug or that it has any relevance to the claims in the Complaint)... clearly have no bearing on the causes of action set forth in the Complaint..."
"The Court is therefore satisfied that the 100-day pause on removals satisfies the second condition and that it is, in fact, a final agency action under section 704."
"Here, the Government has changed 'shall remove' to 'may remove' when it unambiguously means must remove. Accordingly, the 100-day pause is not an action committed to agency discretion."
"But the law does require DHS to explain why a 100-day pause is needed by showing how the policy is logically and reasonably connected to DHS’s asserted reasons. This, DHS did not do."