Ashoka has been one of the worst emperors of India. He massacred many in name of religion.
Since you name Ambedkar, you must know that he said: Islam “killed” Buddhism in India.
“Killed” is key.
What can be bigger shame @TawhidWarrior than this that Ambedkar who once wanted to convert to Islam initially chooses to call it more horrible than Islam & chose not to convert.
Since you are so much awe for Ambedkar, @TawhidWarrior , why not convert to Buddhism following path of Ambedkar.
Hindus destroyed Buddhism? Friend recent precedents too prove what Ambedkar has said: Islam killed Buddhism.
Look, who destroyed Bamiyan Buddha.
Our Srilankan Buddha friends have exposed all anti-Buddhist stand of modern Islamists so well @TawhidWarrior
Ambedkar had placed Jain, Buddhists, Sikhs as Hindu only for laws. Understanding was different for Sanatana. Ambedkar too saw Buddha dharma too have branched from Hindu ethos (ref art 25)
Dear @TawhidWarrior so better don’t dangle in to split the Indic family of Sanatanis, Buddha Dharmiks , Jains & Sikhs.
The world knows well of divisions in Islam. Must have heard of “Khwas” & “Aawam” in jamat camps?
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
It does not matter which period I chose, the saga of atrocities on ancestors gives immense pain.
The power packed attack on our civilization's ethos still continues.
Often it becomes too challenging to type down those sagas.
Fingers tremble as I capture them in words.
There are so many. The attack of Turks, Turko-Mongols, the Portuguese, the Dutch, Huns.
When we had world's best education system, existence of democracy, pursuance of "Science, Mathematics, Philosophy, Astronomy etc etc," they were busy establishing supremacy of new prophets in markets of various regions.
1)I said the point of law. Why you are supposed to kill cow in land where it’s prohibited? It’s not about what’s important & what not. By that logic Quran is damn garbage for we Hindus, so , why not appealing against beheadings?
2) We Hindus tolerated Namaaz on streets for so many years but you have problem not accepting to kill our sacred ones?
3)So yes as far as Asifs case is concerned, first please explain why he went inside Mandir if two water points were already there outside?
3)Have you cared to research why people resort to beating Asif ? No, here urinating in temples isn’t important, right? Why action isn’t imp but reaction?
4)@YawarNazirMir ever cared to condemn @KhanAmanatullah for calling beheading?
1) It’s my stand so I will chose whom I speak about. 2) My countrymen will certainly have preference in my narrative over outsiders. I won’t let thieves take undue advantage of brawls of my home.
3)I do talk of Ashoka’s disastrous massacres. Can u begin with Md (if he existed)?
More here @YawarNazirMir
4)In modern times,Islam brings max troubles,Ahmadiya know it better.
5)since u acknowledge that forced conversion happened, don’t you think there was prob with fundamentals of Islam?
6)Which country is more secured for Ahmadiyas than Hindu Maj India?
7) dear @YawarNazirMir don’t try to defame the faith which has been most tolerant & now sees max threats from all Corners. 8) If instances of urinating in temples, killing of Hindus in BD for Modi’s visit doesn’t trouble u then Ahmadiya love for all is fake.
“The Futuh al-Buldan” by al-Baladhuri was first text containing a few pages on the conquest of Sindh and Muhammad's forces. It was in 892 AD. What took so long to write this tale?
Moreover it doesn’t give biography of Bin-Qasim.
The first biographical information of Bin Qasim appears as a passage in the work of al-Ya'qubi. Year was 898 AD (+186 years).
Al-Tabari mentions few lines in in his work (839 AD). Yet not much celebration of Qasim.
Dear @prachyam7, their so called scientific exploration was an endeavour to spread Christianity too. Columbus, Newton etc etc, all were devout Christians.
Not religious direct wars but , colonisation & related passive conversion was the key.
Fighting for religion directly was understood as waste. They had to make wealth so this new method of passive fanaticism was adopted.
Note, Constantinople had fallen in 1453AD after 100 year war. The discovery of new world was only new way of fanaticism.