1/6 I truly wish everyone who is invested the outmost success and mean no harm, but in terms of transparency I think it’s important for #fintwit to also highlight red flags after seeing some misguided information. $ACIC $ACHR @DoctorSpac@ajitosu@_El_Profesorr@SpacTiger
2/6
I could be wrong, but $ACIC // Archer Aviation is no investment case for me. On one hand they do have a substantial amount of cash and objective third parties state that they have leading technicians. They also have good investors -> @ARKInvest.
3/6 Archer has a $1B + a possible $500M order of United Airlines. The extensive cancellation rights by United Airlines could leave $ACIC without a leg to stand on. It’s fairly much to the parties’ sole discretion to fully cancel the order.
4/6 Wisk, Boeing’s ‘singular play’ for urban air mobility, are taking legal action against Archer Aviation. They are accused of using Wisk’s proprietary intellectual property without their permission.
Archer „appears to copy the same design that Wisk developed and submitted in a confidential patent application to the U.S. Patent and Trademark Office in January 2020"
6/6 Archer projections are still sounds of the distant future (below). It is not hard to imagine that a competitor comes by with a more attractive eVTOL or competitive pricing. F.e. $RTP $JOBY or @WiskAero are taking active steps to certify already existing eVTOL.
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh