Our graphics to illustrate the potential benefits and potential harms of the AstraZeneca vaccine as announced by the MHRA this afternoon.

Benefits accrued over 16 weeks, at three different levels of exposure to the virus.
Avoidance of ICU admission was chosen as a benefit comparator because the potential harms being illustrated are equally severe.

Of course for every one of these potential ICU admissions there are many many people who might have had hospitalisation or long COVID.
Also important benefits are to other people - the reduction in the potential to transmit it.
On the other side, the harms illustrated are only the blood clots currently being monitored.

Severe allergic reactions (anaphylaxis) are too rare with the AZ vaccine in the UK to illustrate - that could be because precautions are being taken for those with allergies.
Thank you to @HardingProf and @d_spiegel for the underlying maths, and of course all those who collect and analyse this data @MHRAgovuk
Slides with further explanation and links now on our website at wintoncentre.maths.cam.ac.uk/news/communica…
Here are the same slides in Spanish (with thanks to team member @mc_climent). Note this is still UK data.
The same slides in German, with thanks to team member @CRSchneider3. Again, this is showing UK data.
The same slides in French, with thanks to team member Lisa Maria Tanase. Again, these are showing UK data.
The same slides in Italian, with thanks to team member @LuoniGiulia. Again, these show UK data.

• • •

Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to force a refresh
 

Keep Current with Alexandra Freeman

Alexandra Freeman Profile picture

Stay in touch and get notified when new unrolls are available from this author!

Read all threads

This Thread may be Removed Anytime!

PDF

Twitter may remove this content at anytime! Save it as PDF for later use!

Try unrolling a thread yourself!

how to unroll video
  1. Follow @ThreadReaderApp to mention us!

  2. From a Twitter thread mention us with a keyword "unroll"
@threadreaderapp unroll

Practice here first or read more on our help page!

More from @alex_freeman

18 Nov 20
Some musings from me on risk perception/communication on BMJ blog today.

We throw numbers around when talking about health risks - they’re a way of precisely defining a concept. But it’s like communicating colour through hexademical codes or wavelengths…
bit.ly/32RzXSL
Firstly, the numbers only make sense to those already very familiar with the arbitrary mapping of number to concept. A designer or physicist might instinctively bring to mind a colour when you say 6d46c4 or 350nm, but the rest of us don’t.
Secondly, although the number defines precisely what colour we’re looking at, it doesn’t define what we perceive.

The circles below are both the same colour, but the context makes a difference to perception.
Read 10 tweets
18 Nov 20
We’ve got a comment in Nature today on why science needs good ‘evidence communication’ and not the typical rules of rhetoric, designed to persuade rather than inform: nature.com/articles/d4158…

@d_spiegel @Sander_vdLinden @MarteauTM
Alongside the comment piece, which ironically sets out to persuade you to consider not be persuasive, are our more detailed thoughts on how to do this: media.nature.com/original/magaz…
Consider your own motivations and ethics – you may feel passionately about your work, but how far is it ok to seek to persuade? Compare a doctor talking to a patient, an expert witness presenting evidence in court, a researcher talking in the media…
Read 9 tweets

Did Thread Reader help you today?

Support us! We are indie developers!


This site is made by just two indie developers on a laptop doing marketing, support and development! Read more about the story.

Become a Premium Member ($3/month or $30/year) and get exclusive features!

Become Premium

Too expensive? Make a small donation by buying us coffee ($5) or help with server cost ($10)

Donate via Paypal Become our Patreon

Thank you for your support!

Follow Us on Twitter!