I am both heartened and saddened to see these developments wrt to Google:
1. Sammy Bengio leaving, seemingly at least in part over the treatment of @timnitGebru and @mmitchell_ai and their amazing team

cnbc.com/2021/04/06/goo…
@timnitGebru @mmitchell_ai 2. An influential Alphabet/Google stakeholder is pushing for better whistleblower protections:

theverge.com/2021/4/6/22370…
@timnitGebru @mmitchell_ai Heartened because I am glad to see that people aren't just turning back to business-as-usual (and all credit to @timnitGebru and @mmitchell_ai for speaking out so clearly & effectively, under terrible circumstances.
@timnitGebru @mmitchell_ai Saddened, because, well see terrible circumstances. Google had SO MANY opportunities to do the right thing. @timnitGebru @mmitchell_ai
and others had put so much effort into advocacy while they were still there...

• • •

Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to force a refresh
 

Keep Current with Emily M. Bender

Emily M. Bender Profile picture

Stay in touch and get notified when new unrolls are available from this author!

Read all threads

This Thread may be Removed Anytime!

PDF

Twitter may remove this content at anytime! Save it as PDF for later use!

Try unrolling a thread yourself!

how to unroll video
  1. Follow @ThreadReaderApp to mention us!

  2. From a Twitter thread mention us with a keyword "unroll"
@threadreaderapp unroll

Practice here first or read more on our help page!

More from @emilymbender

8 Apr
On professional societies not giving academic awards to harassers, "problematic faves", or bigots, a thread: /1
Context: I was a grad student at Stanford (in linguistics) in the 1990s, but I was clueless about Ullman. I think I knew of his textbook, but didn't know whether he was still faculty, let alone where. /2
I hadn't heard about his racist web page until this week. /3
Read 20 tweets
24 Mar
@jonst0kes This will be my last contribution to this conversation.

/1
@jonst0kes I'm glad to see you admitting that this is a conversation about power, and that you are happy with the status quo:



/2
@jonst0kes As for this, I find it rather telling that the "free-speech absolutist" crowd is so terrified of other people ... speaking:



/3
Read 9 tweets
1 Mar
Better late than never, I suppose, but as one of the targets of his harassment, I could have wished that you didn't embolden him and his like in the first place, nor sit by for two months while this went on.
And it's not just about "people who don't want to be contacted" FWIW. He's been spamming all kinds of folks with derogatory remarks about @timnitGebru, me, and others who stand up for us.
@timnitGebru I should have kept a tally of how much time I've spent over the last two months dealing with this crap because it pleased @JeffDean to say in a public post that our paper "didn't meet the bar" for publication.
Read 4 tweets
16 Feb
@timnitGebru He sent it to me this morning too. I just archived it without reading it, because I figured there would be nothing of value there. (I wasn't wrong.) What is it with this guy? As you say, @sibinmohan why does he think Google needs his defense?
@timnitGebru @sibinmohan And more to the point: @timnitGebru and @mmitchell_ai (and @RealAbril and others) your shedding light on this and continuing to do so brings great value. How can we get to better corporate (& other) practices if the injustices are not widely known?
@timnitGebru @sibinmohan @mmitchell_ai @RealAbril As always, I am in awe of your energy & fortitude.
Read 4 tweets
24 Jan
No, I will not make any such change, for two reasons:
1. Process: The camera ready is done, and approved by all of the authors. If I make any changes past this point it will be literally only fixing typos/citations. No changes to content let alone the title.
2. Content: I stand by the title and the question we are asking. The question is motivated because the field has been dominated by "bigger bigger bigger!" (yes in terms of both training data and model size), with most* of the discourse only fawning over the results. >>
Read 13 tweets
16 Dec 20
They sure will. Here's a quick analysis of how, from my perspective as someone who studies societal impacts of natural language technology:
First, some guesses about system components, based on current tech: it will include a very large language model (akin to GPT-3) trained on huge amounts of web text, including Reddit and the like.
It will also likely be trained on sample input/output pairs, where they asked crowdworkers to create the bulleted summaries for news articles.
Read 16 tweets

Did Thread Reader help you today?

Support us! We are indie developers!


This site is made by just two indie developers on a laptop doing marketing, support and development! Read more about the story.

Become a Premium Member ($3/month or $30/year) and get exclusive features!

Become Premium

Too expensive? Make a small donation by buying us coffee ($5) or help with server cost ($10)

Donate via Paypal Become our Patreon

Thank you for your support!

Follow Us on Twitter!