Who. Hired. This. Woman?!?!
π π π
π π π
https://twitter.com/JamesLingford/status/1379565958071681031?s=20
Aside from spouting eugenicist stuff in the public square, does this woman know anything? Anything at all? In her alleged field of research, even?
https://twitter.com/Sagevic2012/status/1379487563036123143?s=20
"Just eyes."
π π π
π π π
Perhaps some of the erisological debaters of "Don't make eugenics a taboo, we need it to meet my formidable arguments one day, some other day!" could formidably talk to Diana S. Fleischman about not trying to make opposition to her tweets into a personal taboo.
FYI, the tweet that started this thread.
Someone asked: whatβs the outrage? My response.
We have people with ADHD living all around us. Weβre still learning about *social* barriers neurodivergent folks face, that make life hard in a way that's conditioned by social fabric not by the neurodivergency itself.
We have people with ADHD living all around us. Weβre still learning about *social* barriers neurodivergent folks face, that make life hard in a way that's conditioned by social fabric not by the neurodivergency itself.
And we can change that.
In other words, we have this real world to think about.
And she constructs "for the sake of argument" a scenario that falsely links attention deficit to genetics. It's irresponsible hogwash in thought experiment fashion.
In other words, we have this real world to think about.
And she constructs "for the sake of argument" a scenario that falsely links attention deficit to genetics. It's irresponsible hogwash in thought experiment fashion.
The fingerprints of scientific racism are all over that βthought experiment,β if you ask me.
β’ β’ β’
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
γ
