1) "The Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation and an assortment of high-profile figures and policymakers are pushing for unregulated gene-editing technologies, the rollout of bio-synthetic food created in laboratories, the expanded use of patented seeds and .." ..
2) .."the rollback of subsidies and support for farmers in places like India."
These neoliberal evangelists despise democracy & believe that state machinery & public money should only facilitate the ambitions of their unaccountable mega-corporations."
3) "Corporations are jumping on the ‘sustainability’ bandwagon by undermining traditional agriculture and genuine sustainable agrifood systems, and packaging this corporate takeover of food as some kind of humanitarian endeavour."
4) "The watchdog organisation Corporate Europe Observatory (CEO) […be-corporateeurope-org.translate.goog/en/2021/03/der…] notes that the European Commission has committed to a fundamental shift away from industrial agriculture. With a 50 per cent pesticide reduction target.." ..
5) .."and a 25 per cent organic agriculture goal by 2030, CEO argues that business as usual is no longer an option. In effect,this creates an existential crisis for corporate seed suppliers & pesticide manufacturers like Bayer, BASF, Corteva (DowDupont) and Syngenta (ChemChina)."
6) "However, these corporations are fighting back on various fronts, not least by waging an ongoing battle to get their new generation of genetic engineering techniques excluded from European regulations."
7) "They do not want plants, animals and micro-organisms created with gene-editing techniques like CRISPR-Cas to be subject to safety checks, monitoring or consumer labelling. This is concerning given the real dangers that these techniques pose."
8) "For example, a new paper [enveurope.springeropen.com/articles/10.11…] published in the journal Environmental Sciences Europe, authored by Dr Katharina Kawall, indicates the negative effects on ecosystems that can result from the release of gene-edited plants."
9) "These unintended effects come from the intended changes induced by genome editing, which can affect various metabolic processes in the plants.
The new paper adds to a growing body of peer-reviewed research [gmwatch.org/en/news/latest…] that .." ..
10) .."calls into question industry claims about the ‘precision’, safety and benefits of gene-edited organisms.
Recent research [extranet.greens-efa.eu/public/media/f…] by the Greens and the European Free Alliance in the European Parliament indicates that 86 per cent of Europeans .." ..
11) .."who have heard of genetically engineered (GE) food want products containing GE organisms to be labelled as such. Some 68 per cent of respondents that have heard of new genetic engineering methods demand that food produced .." ..
12) .."with these techniques, such as CRISPR, to be labelled as GE. Only three per cent agreed with the industry’s proposal to exempt these products from safety testing and labelling.
Regardless, with the help of 1.3 million euros from the Gates Foundation, .." ..
13) .."the industry is paving the way for deregulation by widespread lobbying of policy makers and promoting these technologies on the basis of them protecting the climate and ‘sustainability’."
14) "Through greenwashing, the industry hopes its ‘save-the-planet’ products can dodge regulation and gain public acceptance in an era of ‘climate emergency’.
Not for the first time, the lobbying that the Gates Foundation is engaging in displays complete contempt .." ..
15) .."for democratic processes or public opinion. In 2018, The European Court of Justice ruled that new genetic engineering technologies should be regulated. As described by Marie Astier and Magali Reinert in the French publication Reporterre, .." ..
16) .."Gates is very much at the centre of trying to bypass this ruling.
Of course, it is not just the European agrifood sector that is being targeted by Bill Gates & global agrifood players. India has very much been in the news in recent months due to the ongoing mass protest.."
17) .."involving farmers who want three recent farm acts repealed.
Environmentalist Vandana Shiva has described on numerous occasions how the Gates Foundation through its ‘Ag One’ initiative is pushing for one type of agriculture for the whole world."
18) "A top-down approach regardless of what farmers or the public need or want. The strategy includes digital farming, in which farmers are monitored and mined for their agricultural data, which is then repackaged and sold back to them."
19) "Along with Bill Gates, this is very much the agrifood model that Amazon, Google, Microsoft, Facebook, Bayer, Syngenta, Corteva and Cargill have in mind. The tech giants recent entry into the sector will increasingly lead to a mutually beneficial integration.." ..
20) .."between the companies that supply products to farmers (pesticides, seeds, fertilisers, tractors, drones, etc) and those that control the flow of data (on soil, weather, pests, weeds, land use, consumer preferences, etc) and have access to digital (cloud) infrastructure."
21) .."A system based on corporate concentration and centralisation.
Those farmers who remain in the system will become passive recipients of corporate directives & products on farms owned by the Gates Foundation (now one of the largest owners of farmland in the US), .." ..
22) .."agribusiness and financial institutions/speculators.
The three pieces of farm legislation in India (passed by parliament but on hold) are essential for laying the foundation for this model of agriculture."
23) "The legislation is The Farmers Produce Trade and Commerce (Promotion and Facilitation) Act, The Farmers (Empowerment and Protection) Agreement on Price Assurance and Farm Services Act and The Essential Commodities (Amendment) Act."
24) "The foreign and home-grown (Mukesh Ambani and Gautam Adani) billionaires who have pushed for these laws require a system of contract farming dominated by their big tech, big agribusiness and big retail interests."
25) "Smallholder peasant agriculture is regarded as an impediment to what they require: industrial-scale farms where driverless tractors, drones and genetically engineered seeds are the norm and all data pertaining to land, water, weather, seeds and soils is controlled by them."
26) "It is unfortunate that prominent journalists and media outlets in India are celebrating the legislation and have attempted to unjustifiably discredit farmers who are protesting." ..
27) "It is also worrying that key figures like Dr Ramesh Chand, a member of NITI (National Institute for Transforming India) Ayog, recently stated that the legislation is necessary."
28) "When these figures attack farmers or promote the farm acts, what they are really doing is cheerleading for the destruction of local markets and independent small-scale enterprises, whether farmers, hawkers, food processers or mom and pop corner stores." ..
29) "And by implication, they are helping to ensure that India is surrendering control over its food.
They are doing the bidding of the Gates Foundation and the global agrifood corporations which also want India to eradicate its buffer food stocks."
30) "Some of the very corporations which will then control stocks that India would purchase with foreign exchange holdings. At that stage, any notion of sovereign statehood would be bankrupt as India’s food needs would be dependent on attracting foreign exchange reserves .." ..
31) .." via foreign direct investment or borrowing.
This would represent the ultimate betrayal of India’s farmers and democracy as well as the final surrender of food security and food sovereignty to unaccountable global traders and corporations."
32) "The farm legislation is regressive and will eventually lead to the country relying on outside forces to feed its population. This, in an increasingly volatile world prone to conflict, public health scares, unregulated land and commodity speculation and price shocks."
33) "*MSP, malnutrition and helping farmers*
Consider that India has achieved self-sufficiency in food grains and has ensured that, in theory at least, there is enough food available to feed its entire population. Yet hunger and malnutrition are still major issues."
34) "Initial results from the National Family Health Survey round 5 (NFHS-5) released in January indicate a stagnation or deterioration in most factors related to the nutrition status of the Indian population."
35) "These findings have not accounted for the effects of the COVID-19 lockdown, which could see severe long-term adverse impacts on poverty, health and nutrition.
The survey findings suggest that people’s ability to access good quality diets has been impacted by.." ..
36) .."the economic slowdown in recent years and a subsequent deterioration in poverty and consumption. Such a conclusion might not be too far off the mark given the findings of the consumption expenditure survey of the National Statistical Office (2017-18)."
37) "In a December 2019 article, economist S Subramanian writes:
'Employing the modest Rangarajan Committee poverty line… we find that the… proportion of the population in poverty, has climbed up from 31% to 35%, thus inverting a long trend of declining poverty ratios." ..
38) .."'If the poverty line is raised by 20% to a less modest but still modest level, then we find… [poverty]… rises precipitously from 42% to 52%.'
Supporters of the farm legislation are fond of saying the impact will be higher income for farmers.." ..
39) .."and greater efficiency in food distribution. They fail to acknowledge that the neoliberal policies they have backed over the years have driven many farmers out of agriculture, into debt or to the edge of bankruptcy."
40) "They are now pushing for more of the same under the banner of helping farmers.
These policies mainly stem from India’s foreign exchange crisis in the 1990s. In return for up to more than $120 billion in World Bank loans at the time, India was directed.." ..
41) .."to dismantle its state-owned seed supply system, reduce subsidies, run down public agriculture institutions and offer incentives for the growing of cash crops to earn foreign exchange."
42) "The plan involves shifting at least 400 million from the countryside into cities. We have seen the running down of the sector for decades, spiralling input costs, withdrawal of government assistance & the impacts of cheap, subsidised imports which depress farmers’ incomes."
43) "The result is an acute agrarian crisis.
Through the new farm laws, the Modi government is now trying to accelerate the planned depopulation of the countryside by drastically reducing the role of the public sector in agriculture to that of a facilitator of private capital."
44) "There is a solution to poverty, hunger and rural distress. But it is being side-lined in favour of a corporate agenda.
The Research Unit for Political Economy (RUPE) notes [rupeindia.wordpress.com/2021/04/03/wha…] that minimum support prices (MSP) via government procurement.." ..
45) .."of essential crops and commodities should be extended to the likes of maize, cotton, oilseed and pulses. At the moment, only farmers in certain states who produce rice and wheat are the main beneficiaries of government procurement at MSP."
46) "RUPE says that since per capita protein consumption in India is abysmally low and has fallen further during the liberalisation era, the provision of pulses in the public distribution system (PDS) is long overdue and desperately needed."
47) "RUPE argues that the ‘excess’ stocks of food grain with the Food Corporation of India are merely the result of the failure or refusal of the government to distribute grain to the people.
(For those not familiar with the PDS: central government via the Food Corporation.." ..
48) .."of India (FCI) is responsible for buying food grains from farmers at MSP at state-run market yards or mandis. It then allocates the grains to each state. State governments then deliver to the ration shops.)"
49) "If public procurement of a wider range of crops at the MSP were to occur – and MSP were guaranteed for rice and wheat across all states – it would help address hunger and malnutritional as well as farmer distress."
50) "Instead of rolling back the role of the public sector and surrendering the system to foreign corporations, there is a need to further expand official procurement and public distribution. This would occur by extending procurement to additional states.." ..
51) .."and expanding the range of commodities under the PDS.
Of course, some will raise a red flag here and say this would cost too much. But as RUPE notes, it would cost around 20 per cent of the current handouts (‘incentives’) received by corporations.." ..
52) .."and their super-rich owners which do not benefit the bulk of the wider population in any way.
Furthermore, if policymakers were really serious about ‘sustainability’ and boosting the rural economy, they would reject the fake high-tech.." ..
53) .."corporate-controlled ‘sustainability’ agenda and a reliance on rigged and unstable global markets. They would embrace an approach to agriculture based on agroecological principles, short supply chains and local markets."
54) "If the last 12 months have shown anything, it is that decentralised regional and local community-owned food systems are now needed more than ever.
But a solution that would genuinely serve to help address rural distress and malnutrition does not suit.." ..
55) .."the agenda of the Gates Foundation and its corporate entourage."

Article by Colin Todhunter, published 7.4.21 off-guardian.org/2021/04/07/fou…
Another of Colin Todhunter’s excellent articles from some time ago
Colin seems to have a hawk’s eye on a few issues 😍

• • •

Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to force a refresh

Keep Current with Alison Blunt

Alison Blunt Profile picture

Stay in touch and get notified when new unrolls are available from this author!

Read all threads

This Thread may be Removed Anytime!


Twitter may remove this content at anytime! Save it as PDF for later use!

Try unrolling a thread yourself!

how to unroll video
  1. Follow @ThreadReaderApp to mention us!

  2. From a Twitter thread mention us with a keyword "unroll"
@threadreaderapp unroll

Practice here first or read more on our help page!

More from @AlisonBlunt

7 Apr
1) "Since early February, a whole series of alarming statements about SARS-CoV-2 and its alleged mutations have been circulating in the media.
Two of the most prominent examples are these: [see text image]"
2) "Probably just about everyone knows these quotes, which come from another so-called "corona expert” - one of the "voices of science.” How many experts are there?"
3) "Nevertheless, the assertions of this “expert," a virologist by profession, have not only been extensively disseminated via many media channels, but have also often been (justifiably) criticised."
Read 33 tweets
1 Apr
1/4 Auto-translated, "Interviews (dsalud.com/reportajes/ent…), fraud and falsehoods in the medical field (dsalud.com/reportajes/fra… medico/)
Stefan Lanka: "Viruses are not microbes and have no capacity to infect".
Issue 247 - April 2021"
2/4 "The well-known German virologist Stefan Lanka assures us that viruses are neither microbes nor do they have infectious capacity, which means that Covid-19 could not have been caused by a coronavirus such as the alleged SARS-CoV-2, the existence of which has not been proven."
3/4 "This is what he explained during an exclusive video interview in which he also explains that it is time to question everything that Virology, Microbiology and Medicine have to say about viruses. Moreover, he asserts that the tests used for Covid-19 are a scam, .."
Read 4 tweets
31 Mar
1/6 "Having completed a masterful account of his conversation with Hegelian thought in the book, Person als Vermittlung (The Person as Mediator) he then focused his mind &heart on having a conversation with the elements,with landscape &the way in which humans inhabit this earth."
2/6 "This earth is the only constant in our lives. It has been here for millions of years before us. It was his gift to unearth its riches: that this ‘human-come-lately’ is but the latest link in the chain of evolution. We must become aware of our present stage .." ..
3/6 .."of ‘becoming’ and to do this we need to look back at our history. In school we learned that we must understand our history, otherwise we condemn ourselves to making the mistakes of the past. All the animals and creatures of this earth are our former brothers and sisters.."
Read 6 tweets
31 Mar
1/6 "The way one does research into nonexistent history is to tell the story and find out what happened. I believe this isn’t very different from what historians of the so-called real world do. Even if we are present at some historic event, do we comprehend it .." ..
2/6 .."—can we even remember it—until we can tell it as a story? And for events in times or places outside our own experience, we have nothing to go on but the stories other people tell us. Past events exist, after all, only in memory, which is a form of imagination."
3/6 "The event is real now, but once it’s then, its continuing reality is entirely up to us, dependent on our energy and honesty. If we let it drop from memory, only imagination can restore the least glimmer of it."
Read 6 tweets
21 Mar
'The Silence of the Complicit
Artists are also silent on Corona because they are afraid of "their" audience - from whom they need encouragement.'
11.3.21 by Jens Fischer Rodrian
"The artists! They just accept performance bans and corona terror, hunker down in silence and refuse to revolt - as we would have expected them to do." - Yes, for most artists this cliché is true. But what about us, the audience?"
"Have we lifted a finger to get our artists - our musicians, cabaret performers, theatre actors and other live performers - back? Did we write protest letters to politicians and encouraging messages to cultural workers we know?"
Read 34 tweets
17 Mar
1) "The Initiators of the Corona Crisis Have Been Clearly Identified - Virologists - who claim the existence of disease-causing viruses are committing scientific fraud and must be be prosecuted"
Translation wissenschafftplus.de/uploads/articl…
2) "Overview
Science and the scientific method are important tools that help to identify and solve challenges. Science has very clear rules: Claims must be proven - they must be transparent, comprehensible and verifiable."
3) "Only statements that are verifiable may be called scientific, everything else falls within the realm of faith. Matters of faith must not be presented as scientifically proven facts to derive or justify governmental measures."
Read 168 tweets

Did Thread Reader help you today?

Support us! We are indie developers!

This site is made by just two indie developers on a laptop doing marketing, support and development! Read more about the story.

Become a Premium Member ($3/month or $30/year) and get exclusive features!

Become Premium

Too expensive? Make a small donation by buying us coffee ($5) or help with server cost ($10)

Donate via Paypal Become our Patreon

Thank you for your support!

Follow Us on Twitter!