Debates over big spending bills like "infrastructure" absurdly proceed as if the U.S. government is tiny and underfunded, and this is the first time it has asked the American people for vast sums of money to tackle the problem under discussion.
In truth, the government is floating in a vast sea of money, and billions of it just vanish into thin air - absorbed by staggering bureaucratic costs, stolen by fraudsters, poured into political slush funds. A great deal of that money is weaponized against the American people.
There is absolutely ZERO reason to believe the current administration and federal bureaucracy can be trusted with billions of dollars to build infrastructure. Everything about their track record argues to the contrary. The American people would be fools to trust them.
They're not even PRETENDING that most of this money will actually go to "infrastructure." In the past we got big promises of gleaming bridges, crackling power lines, and miraculous trains, but after the bill was passed, Democrats diverted the money into slush funds.
This time they're admitting right up front that most of the money they demand will be poured into their pet projects, special interests, social engineering programs, and political operations. If we're REALLY lucky, a nickel on the dollar MIGHT build actual roads and bridges.
It's a huge problem that we can't trust our government to build roads, or fulfill any of its other duties. Even if it tried, the rest of our political system would block true "infrastructure" projects or rob them blind. Our political class spends money. It doesn't build stuff.
The notion of modern America building something like the Hoover Dam - or a functioning "high-speed rail" network - is utterly laughable. The American PEOPLE can still work wonders, but their government has degenerated into primitive bureaucratic savagery.
This is reflected in the infantile tactics our political class employs to swindle us today. When you hear an idiot like Joe Biden babbling about trains that move as fast as planes, you know your political system has completely run out of vision and imagination.
They can't make any kind of logical, rational argument for big federal spending on infrastructure, so they don't even try. They just wave lollipops at us and make goo-goo noises. They know this is all just a game, and they win when they get their hands on our money.
This is one of the many reasons government should be entrusted with limited powers while private industry does most of the work. The record of achievement, or failure, of private companies MATTERS. They get sued for making fraudulent claims and embezzling funds.
Somehow we've become a society that spends hours poring over Yelp reviews before hiring someone to mow our lawns... but we'll let the same incompetent swindlers in DC demand trillions more for "infrastructure" without a word about their long record of fraud and failure.
We keep pouring money into a bankrupt, corrupt, SYSTEMICALLY incompetent government and hoping this time the Nigerian prince will finally deposit his millions in our bank accounts. This time we'll get results instead of theft, waste, and special interest feeding frenzies.
There is no reason to give a single extra penny to a government teeming with waste and fraud, institutionally incapable of honesty or discipline. Let's have the political elite show us a little good faith for a change and finance "infrastructure" entirely with cuts and reforms.
The actual amount of money flagged for anything that could legitimately be described as "infrastructure" in the current proposals could easily be financed by cutting bloat and waste from existing federal programs. EASILY. Junk the rest and do that.
Is that really so much to ask of our princely government, after WE'VE made so many sacrifices during the pandemic? If this "infrastructure" is so vital, let the aristocracy in DC pay for it, as a gesture of faith and loyalty to the American people, and to prove it CAN reform.
I'll wager the few waste-and-abuse hawks in Congress could produce a list of expensive bullshit that could be slashed to pay for the truly necessary infrastructure spending by the end of this business day. Let's commission THAT proposal and let the American people consider it.
And then let's appoint a large, serious, bipartisan oversight team to ensure every dollar of that money actually goes to roads and bridges. No special interest heists, no madcap environmentalist lawsuits, no bait and switch. Make this system prove it can actually build a bridge.
I warn you, "infrastructure" has already turned into another rolling grift for the political class, and it's one of the biggest, juiciest cons they have going. They will NEVER keep their promises to build stuff. Why should they? That would actually harm their true interests.
If I demand a trillion dollars and then actually build a trillion dollars' worth of infrastructure, it's over and done. I did my job. The people don't need to give me any more money, especially if I did my job extremely well. There's no power or profit in that.
But if I demand a trillion dollars and then steal, lose, or misallocate most of it, then I get to come back and demand another trillion to fix those "crumbling roads and bridges," just like Barack Obama did. I can keep that scam up FOREVER, sounding pious every step of the way.
See also: education, welfare spending. You can count on our degenerate political class to steal most of the money you give them, deliberately make every problem WORSE, and then demand more money to fix the problems YOU supposedly don't "care " about as much as they do.
There is a fundamental contradiction between the "Great Reset" model of rebooting democracy with an authoritarian core, because authoritarian power is supposedly needed to get important things done, and the reality of a zillion-dollar government that can't actually DO anything.
We should reject the authoritarianism on principle anyway, but it's a false promise even when taken on its own merits. Our political class is too greedy, corrupt, and ideologically blind to accomplish anything on a grand scale, no matter how much power or money we give them.
We need to break this government down, liberate most of its money and manpower, force it to live within its means, and get back to an America where value is demanded for every dollar, and accountability is demanded for every theft and failure. THAT should be the Great Reset. /end
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
The quest to create New Soviet Man - to re-engineer the human race into something more compatible with collectivism - has never ended, or even paused.
Success may finally be close at hand, as the last vestiges of individualism and objective truth are under attack.
Western culture and politics have degenerated into endless warfare against every barrier that protects individuals from being subsumed into the hive of the centralized State. The key battleground is family: our tendency to bond in a way that makes us independent from the State.
Every piece of heavy artillery in the Left's inventory - culture, academia, politics - is right now trained on what remains of the family unit. The shelling is heavy and incessant. Every single aspect of the formula "boy meets girl and raises family" is under assault.
American culture and politics are largely based on assuming the worst intentions and motivations for everything individuals say and do. Imagine where we could go if we flipped that script and assumed the best: trusting each other, showing patience and forgiveness.
There would be mistakes and debacles, of course. People are not always worthy of trust. They don't always respond to goodwill in kind. Sometimes it's a mistake to assume good intentions. People don't always take the second chance offered by forgiveness.
We wouldn't want to become utterly naive or dangerously ignorant, of course, but in our conversations and culture, we've grown dangerously short of goodwill, and that is a vital resource for a functioning civil society, a nation of sovereign individuals who value liberty.
For decades we argued about the fictitious "wall of separation between church and state," when we should have been building a higher and thicker wall of separation between corporations and state.
What was the point of all that "wall between church and state" stuff? In theory, it's about separating elections and government from not religious FAITH, but religious ORGANIZATIONS. You can't order individuals not to vote based on their deep personal religious convictions.
The fear was that religious organizations would exercise power over the elected government, imposing their beliefs on everyone. The image of medieval popes manipulating European kings was constantly invoked. We supposedly had to be on guard against Bible pages becoming law.
This should be an existential crisis for "60 Minutes," and maybe for the entire CBS News division.
Lucky for them, our "news" media has degenerated into such a gruesome circus of political propaganda that it probably won't even get anyone reprimanded.
The crude and fraudulent DeSantis hit piece is on par with Rathergate, but this time there probably won't be any pretense of an internal investigation or heads rolling. The media learned from 2004 that it should never admit wrongdoing, or even simulate accountability.
The media's takeaway from Rathergate and the rise of blogging and alternative media wasn't "tell the truth and don't let political partisans invent phony news stories." It wasn't even "try not to get caught lying." It was "do not admit error or seek accountability."
At the same time the Left was sneering at ordinary people for being too obsessed with money and materialism, they were using gigantic amounts of money - much of it pilfered from us through taxes and gov't spending - to destroy our society and remake it in their image.
For all their pious sermons about the Evil Dollar and rising above material concerns to achieve spiritual fulfillment, leftists are the most money-grubbing people in the world. Their "movement" is fueled by mountains of cold hard cash, not popular appeal.
One suspects the decades of leftist sermons against the sins of money and materialism were largely intended to make gullible middle-class people stop valuing their income and assets, making it easier for the Left to seize them. And seize they did, on a staggering scale.
A coldly rational and impartial observer, comparing the outcomes between states and counties, would have no choice but to conclude that masks make the coronavirus pandemic WORSE.
Another possibility is that masks have very minimal benefits, which are completely overwhelmed by other factors in different locations - but in comparisons were other factors seem nearly identical, states with strict mask mandates and high compliance tend to fare worse.
This seems like an awfully important point to resolve, doesn't it? Shouldn't we be urgently digging into this "mask paradox" with every scientific tool at our disposal? We are not just urged, but often FORCED to wear them. We should determine if they're worse than useless.