Jerusalem Post has an interview with Eitan Klein (deputy director of IAA's theft prevention unit) about the recent announcement of Judean Desert finds.
Several things here worth attention . . . jpost.com/jerusalem-repo…
Klein repeats the claim that the trigger for the survey project came with the appearance of the "Jerusalem Papryrus" on the antiquities market -- without noting that it's likely a forgery.
Is anyone familiar with the "Bar Kochba-era parchments" that the article claims were discovered by looters in a cave in 2009?
Similarly, this seems like an odd reference to "fragments of Hebrew script from the Second Temple Period" found in 2016 -- especially given the claim the new scroll fragments are the 1st found in 60 years. Is this real? Is it a misunderstanding by the journalist?
This certainly *does* seem to be a misunderstanding by the journalist: previous reporting made clear that the IAA has *surveyed* around 500 caves, but only excavated in a few select ones.
Further highlighting that budgetary issues might have been one reason for the IAA's announcing the finds when they did.
Just like Uzi Dahari (former IAA deputy director): "Israeli archaeology is not conducted on behalf of any ideology, nor does it explicitly serve the heritage of the Jewish people on its land. It is pure science . . ."
This is interesting, since in his interview w/the Norwegian weekly Morgenbladet Klein said the trash used to date looting ranged from 50-60 years ago to the last *20* years -- why not highlight 2 years ago there, especially since the journalist was questioning the "race" aspect?
If you want to read a much more illuminating critical look at these issues, take a look at the Morgenbladet article (and I don't say this simply because they interviewed me -- the piece is quite well done). morgenbladet.no/aktuelt/2021/0…
UPDATE: Stephen Goranson has pointed me to the publication of the "Bar-Kochba era parchment" seized in 2009 jstor.org/stable/23075008
Eshel, Eshel, and Yardeni note that it was reported seized on May 6, 2009 by the IAA's theft prevention unit.
They suggest it may have come from the "Cave of the Tetradrachm" in the West Bank, because that cave was known to have been dug by looters in 2008-9.
However, based on the information from the journal article & the news report, it's not clear (as Klein claims or the journalist interpreted) that the item was actually dug up in that specific cave or that it was in 2009.
But the incident does help provide more background for the claims of looting in these caves in recent years, used to justify the current Judean Desert survey.
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
Much of the review is concerned with how archaeology is presented to the public.
Finley recognizes that, for all their flaws, 19th-century archaeologist-explorers had this down.
Has anyone heard of the book Testaments of Time by Leo Deuel? It's a popular account of manuscript hunting, first published in 1965. @EvaMroczek@LivLied
It's a broad survey of the material, what you might expect for 1965: starts with Renaissance humanists, and moves on to chapters on Tischendorf, the Cairo Geniza, Oxyrhynchus, the Dead Sea Scrolls, but also a range of other things . . .
It also includes what you imagine might have been standard attitudes in the 1960s, cheering on manuscript hunters like Tischendorf who "outwit" the "negligent but perversely possessive" and "half-literate" monks
A week after a settlement reached between Sotheby's, the Museum for Islamic Art in Jerusalem, & other parties regarding the cancelation of the museum's sale of objects, the museum's director announces he's leaving his position at the end of the month. haaretz.com/israel-news/cu…
There's no suggestion from the article that Sheiban's resignation is directly tied to the sale or its being cancelled, and his resignation letter frame things quite differently, but the article does notes that the saga "cast a pall over Sheiban’s tenure as museum director"
To be clear, these new find is *not* from Qumran -- it consists of fragments of a slightly later Bar Kokhba scroll from Wadi Murabba'at (Nahal Darga) to the south.
The find was part of the operation started in 2017 to survey the Judean Desert.
What Haaretz doesn't tell us -- it's only hinted at by the reference to the Civil Administration -- is that most of the Judean Desert, including Murabba'at, is in the West Bank.
What's discouraging is that scholars continue to publicly pronounce that they think blatant forgeries might be genuine & that we need to keep having pointless debates about them for decades.
Here, not just Tabor but archaeologist Shimon Gibson.
Look who else think Shapira's Deuteronomy was authentic @arsteinjustnes
Happy to say that my review of Veritas, and the saga of the “Gospel of Jesus’s Wife” forgery, is now published at @TheTLS. the-tls.co.uk/articles/verit…
(Note: As usual, the author was not responsible for the title or the lead photo.)
Thanks to @arsteinjustnes@LivLied@papyrologyatman@dana_lande and the rest of the Lying Pen of Scribes project for discussing this book with me.
(But be sure not to blame them for anything in the review itself!)