Has anyone heard of the book Testaments of Time by Leo Deuel? It's a popular account of manuscript hunting, first published in 1965. @EvaMroczek@LivLied
It's a broad survey of the material, what you might expect for 1965: starts with Renaissance humanists, and moves on to chapters on Tischendorf, the Cairo Geniza, Oxyrhynchus, the Dead Sea Scrolls, but also a range of other things . . .
It also includes what you imagine might have been standard attitudes in the 1960s, cheering on manuscript hunters like Tischendorf who "outwit" the "negligent but perversely possessive" and "half-literate" monks
There's a chapter on Shapira's Deuteronomy, which first led me to the book. It like the rest looks decently researched, well-written enough, with some solid insights but not outstanding.
More than that, though, what stands out are some well-chosen epigraphs.
There's this striking one from Anatole France to open the book, on the burning desire to find manuscripts known to exist.
And another one, opening the chapter on Shapira, from Edward FitzGerald/Omar Khayyam's Rubaiyat.
". . . with advances in textual criticism, paleography, and chemical and physical analysis, faking may soon become a dying art." From 1965. Hahahahahaha
To be fair, the observations here are solid on the challenges of forging an entire manuscript; it's not surprising so many recent ancient manuscript forgeries have been fragments.
But more than any of this, what strikes me most about the book is Deuel himself:
This book was first published by Alfred A. Knopf, then republished in 1970 by Penguin.
He wrote other popular books on archaeology for St. Martin's Press, Schocken Books, and Harper & Row.
He appears to have been a major popularizer of archaeology in the 1960s and 1970s -- yet I've never heard of him.
Most of the little I can find out about him comes from the bios in the books themselves.
(on the right, from Treasures of Time, originally published in 1961)
Deuel's books were translated into French, German, Italian, Russian, Polish, Czech, Slovak, and Japanese at least, from what I've seen.
Yet, a half-century later, how many people know who he was?
Finley reviews Deuel (and many others) for the New York Review of Books, 1966
Judging from the responses (& non-responses too, I guess), it appears no one here had heard of this book or of Deuel -- including me. I find this very interesting and a little sad.
UPDATE: We do have someone who's heard of Deuel and Testaments of Time, and considers it a classic of its kind, though perhaps more in Europe.
Thanks @mrustow
Much of the review is concerned with how archaeology is presented to the public.
Finley recognizes that, for all their flaws, 19th-century archaeologist-explorers had this down.
Jerusalem Post has an interview with Eitan Klein (deputy director of IAA's theft prevention unit) about the recent announcement of Judean Desert finds.
Several things here worth attention . . . jpost.com/jerusalem-repo…
Klein repeats the claim that the trigger for the survey project came with the appearance of the "Jerusalem Papryrus" on the antiquities market -- without noting that it's likely a forgery.
Is anyone familiar with the "Bar Kochba-era parchments" that the article claims were discovered by looters in a cave in 2009?
A week after a settlement reached between Sotheby's, the Museum for Islamic Art in Jerusalem, & other parties regarding the cancelation of the museum's sale of objects, the museum's director announces he's leaving his position at the end of the month. haaretz.com/israel-news/cu…
There's no suggestion from the article that Sheiban's resignation is directly tied to the sale or its being cancelled, and his resignation letter frame things quite differently, but the article does notes that the saga "cast a pall over Sheiban’s tenure as museum director"
To be clear, these new find is *not* from Qumran -- it consists of fragments of a slightly later Bar Kokhba scroll from Wadi Murabba'at (Nahal Darga) to the south.
The find was part of the operation started in 2017 to survey the Judean Desert.
What Haaretz doesn't tell us -- it's only hinted at by the reference to the Civil Administration -- is that most of the Judean Desert, including Murabba'at, is in the West Bank.
What's discouraging is that scholars continue to publicly pronounce that they think blatant forgeries might be genuine & that we need to keep having pointless debates about them for decades.
Here, not just Tabor but archaeologist Shimon Gibson.
Look who else think Shapira's Deuteronomy was authentic @arsteinjustnes
Happy to say that my review of Veritas, and the saga of the “Gospel of Jesus’s Wife” forgery, is now published at @TheTLS. the-tls.co.uk/articles/verit…
(Note: As usual, the author was not responsible for the title or the lead photo.)
Thanks to @arsteinjustnes@LivLied@papyrologyatman@dana_lande and the rest of the Lying Pen of Scribes project for discussing this book with me.
(But be sure not to blame them for anything in the review itself!)