It has taken a day or two but @tom_bullock_ has brought together this @JanesINTEL article on observed Russian troop movements to the border with Ukraine: janes.com/defence-news/n… 
Tom has identified at least 14 separate Russian units, including what may be the 119 Missile Brigade with Iskanders. The moves at present appear benign and somewhat leisurely. And, as others have observed, there are few signs of an offensive nature at present.
There has been some cyber activity recently, including a state-sponsored attack on a Ukrainian government site in an attempt to steal data, and there was much greater activity in February. But, there are no clear signs of a targeted campaign. Which we might expect to precede war.
However, it is worth noting that if something were to happen - these forces would be quite well positioned to do something about it, and much of Russia's cyber infrastructure can be activated very quickly and with ease.
So, ruling out an immediate threat of conflict, there are many other options explaining the deployment. For instance, sometimes an exercise really is just an exercise. This kind of move was fairly routine for Soviet forces - the Russians might be feeling rusty.
It might be an effort to influence or coerce Ukraine, but again, there were already thousands of Russian troops on the border, and Ukraine is unlikely to harbour many illusions about how a war with Russia would play out. So, it doesn't necessarily follow that more force is needed
It might be an effort to demonstrate resolve to NATO and the EU, and indicate the level of commitment required to adequately counter Russia's armed forces. We shall have to wait and see how the situation develops.
Possibly more interesting signs could include the movement of troops at night, and away from population centres to avoid sightings. Efforts to establish different conflicting lines of advance. Pre-positioning of fuel dumps and spare parts. An increase in cyber and info ops.
Finally, it is worth considering what Russia would gain from another conflict - Ukraine already has a trade deal with the EU, and Russian pressure pushes it closer to NATO clearly. These are both sub-optimal outcomes for the Kremlin. There is the question of water on Crimea...
But there are presumably less-risky options to resolving that issue than war. I would hazard the guess that if there is any motivation outside of testing the ability to do it, it is related to a need to be taken seriously. Just a few thoughts - enjoy the article!
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
