Thread:

One of the most fascinating manifestations of transmisogyny is the way it shapes the public discourse on transness overall.

In many ways, the wider public perceives trans women as the “source” or “root” of transgender phenomenon. We are to “blame” for this “deviance”.
Because of this, most discourse and policy actions on trans issues is framed in a peculiar way:

People/society need to be protected from trans women, but AFAB people need to be protected from the corrupting influence of transness *itself*.

I’ll tell you why that’s interesting
It becomes a lens to understand the difference between transmisogyny and garden-variety misogyny.

In this scenario, trans women are demonized, but AFAB trans people are infantilized.

Transness isn’t something AFAB trans folk are, it’s something that *happens* to them.
This framing is almost never used for trans women. We are viewed as defective *people*.

And that’s the misogyny/transmisogny distinction here. The “uterus magic” of sex-essentialism means that AFAB trans folk get denied agency, and pitied as too naive to understand “the agenda”
Whereas for trans women...the “phallic taint” of sex-essentialism means we retain all the danger associated with men, but amplified by the distrust of femininity (which is viewed as artifice and deceptive).

They see us as both corrupters of men and thieves of women & girls.
And so, when laws are targeted at trans folk, they are generally intended to:

-criminalize and marginalize trans women, and must us as visible and “marked” as possible
-prevent AFAB trans people from ever transitioning or even being exposed to trans “ideology” to begin with
To intersect this back to my lengthy thread from last week on purity culture:

Trans women are viewed as deeply deviant because femininity is extremely sexualized in our culture, so people cannot imagine anyone would “give up maleness” for anything other than sexual reasons.
To make things worse, our weirdly puritanical culture still has hang ups about the idea of women’s sexual pleasure, especially w/o procreation.

By our very nature, trans women cannot bear children, which society views as the true “purpose” of women. Even T*RFs will tell you that
Because of this, trans women are already “failed women”, because uterus magic.

So, (according to the wider public), we are people who transitioned to womanhood for sexual purposes who don’t even have the decency to make babies while doing it.

Perversion incarnate!
For certain theorists, like Blanchard & Bailey...queer trans women are EVEN WORSE.

Not only are we transitioning for sexual reasons without having the decency to be fetus incubators, but we also don’t even have the decency to be pleasure objects for men! [Women’s OTHER purpose.]
So, that’s half of the Villainy of Trans Women.

The other half, of course, is that we’re “infecting women and girls” with our twisted ideology and convincing them to “mutilate” their bodies.

Which, as I discussed in this earlier thread, is a TERRIBLE sin to heteropatriachy.
You see this in even the bills rhetoric around trans youth bills.

The worries are:

For young trans girls: their presence in bathrooms/locker rooms, & competing in sports [They ARE the danger ]

For AFAB trans kids: their breasts, reproductive capacity [Must be protected!]
In essence, the structure of our culture is such that we place trans women as the most extreme of villains, the culmination of all thing bad, dangerous, and corrupt about gender and sexuality.

And trans men and other AFAB trans people are naive, innocent, preyed-upon victims.
And, of course, what makes that all the more utterly fucked up is that the actual reality is trans women are PROFOUNDLY marginalized, and we have extraordinarily little social power. We’re terribly vulnerable.

And that makes it very hard to counteract this overarching view of us
As per usual, if you like my threads, tips are always appreciated.

I’m working on other ways to support my work and put my thinky-thoughts out, but I’m also stressed out, neurodivergent healthcare worker who is on call 24-7 one week out of three. 🥴

ko-fi.com/maribrighe
The usual trash rabble have found this thread, and I remain extremely grateful for the limit replies feature. Still will be blocking transphobes who quote-tweet though.

• • •

Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to force a refresh
 

Keep Current with Mari Brighe

Mari Brighe Profile picture

Stay in touch and get notified when new unrolls are available from this author!

Read all threads

This Thread may be Removed Anytime!

PDF

Twitter may remove this content at anytime! Save it as PDF for later use!

Try unrolling a thread yourself!

how to unroll video
  1. Follow @ThreadReaderApp to mention us!

  2. From a Twitter thread mention us with a keyword "unroll"
@threadreaderapp unroll

Practice here first or read more on our help page!

More from @MariBrighe

30 Mar
If the identity terms I use for myself offend you, I kindly invite you to Get Fucked.

Yes, I identify as transsexual, which I recognize as existing under the wider transgender umbrella. I identify this way because my experience of transness is rooted in physical dysphoria.
My needs as a trans woman centered around physical/medical transition. That is MY experience. Transsexual as an identity gives me space to both honor that specific experience and advocate for those needs.

It has *nothing* to do with having or needing bottom surgery to be trans
MANY trans women have reclaimed transsexual as an identity that they find affirming for their experiences.

Please don’t project *your* baggage with terminology onto others, or make ridiculous, facile assumptions about my beliefs based on a single word in my profiles
Read 4 tweets
30 Mar
Heteropatriachy says the two worst things a woman can be are:

1. Unfuckable
2. Fuckable but unavailable
This is so much the case that heteropatriachy tries to define womanhood essentially by whether a woman is fuckable & available to them.

Which is why lesbians, fat women, Black women, trans women, sex workers, disabled women all so easily get shunted to “unwoman” so often.
For trans women, you can see this manifest in Harry Benjamin’s insistence “true transsexual” were attracted to men.

You can see it in Blanchard and Bailey’s “autogynephilia” obsession...insisting womanhood without sexual availability to men must be a paraphilia.
Read 26 tweets
29 Mar
Trans rights are not just for unobtrusive AFAB non-binary people and trans men who uphold traditional patriarchal paradigms

Being feminine & cis-passing has never gotten me any rights, just creepers, objectification, & accusations of “deception”

Smacks of femmephobia & misogyny
Trans women continue to be primary target of transphobic harassment, and the most vitriolic hate is reserved for us. That’s life under transmisogyny, and how pretty you are matters very little. Whiteness and wealth might protect a little.

But we are still villains, each of us.
Transmisogyny-exempt folk are written off as merely misguided...brainwashed by the Agenda.

Trans women are castigated as perverts, r*pists, deviants, & child-abusers...orchestrators of a grand sexual conspiracy to undermine society & ruin the youth

Passing isn’t armor from that
Read 4 tweets
18 Nov 20
I know I’ve said this before, but:

We are absolutely not prepared for the aftermath of the collective trauma experienced by healthcare workers during this pandemic.
My colleagues across functional areas and allied professions are so far beyond their limits. Not just doctors and nurses, but laboratory, radiology, respiratory therapy, transport, pharmacy, housekeeping, nutrition, physical plant, clerics, etc. It’s ALL OF US.
It’s also important to understand that most healthcare & hospital workers are women. Many are BIPOC and/or immigrants. Many of us are from poor/working class backgrounds bc healthcare was an accessible path to employment stability/benefits.

We’re people the world tends to ignore
Read 8 tweets
28 Mar 19
Unpopular opinion and rant time:

I don’t give a crap about whether a lawmaker displays the trans pride flag in their office. It’s a nice photo op, and a sign that we’re no longer *absolute* political poison pills. But, it’s a toothless milquetoast gesture.

What I DO care about:
-Does your office have trans people on its payroll?
-Are you actively pushing for a comprehensive LGBTQ civil-rights act?
-Are working to make healthcare and transition care available to every trans person?
-Are you working to address the rising violence against TWOC?
-Are you actually talking to trans people who don’t work for a national organization about what is important to us?
-Are you working to address the HORRIFIC treatment of trans women in prisons and immigrantion detention?
-Are you working for sex work decrim and SWer rights?
Read 6 tweets
20 Mar 19
Hey y’all,

I am genuinely curious...how many of you were “identified” as “gifted” at some point in K-12, but diagnosed with one or more learning/cognitive disabilities as an adult. Obviously, no need to participate if you don’t feel comfortable sharing.
I ask because I find myself really frustrated knowing so many of the things I struggled with, that I was made to feel were my personal failings, are things I have no control over, and maybe college would have sucked a lot less if I could have had support for disabilities.
I was ID’d as “profoundly gifted” when I was 7. I was in my mid twenties when I was diagnosed as autistic. Over the ensuing years, it’s been figured out that I also have sensory processing disorder, visual-spatial/visual-motor deficit, dysgraphia, and dyspraxia.
Read 7 tweets

Did Thread Reader help you today?

Support us! We are indie developers!


This site is made by just two indie developers on a laptop doing marketing, support and development! Read more about the story.

Become a Premium Member ($3/month or $30/year) and get exclusive features!

Become Premium

Too expensive? Make a small donation by buying us coffee ($5) or help with server cost ($10)

Donate via Paypal Become our Patreon

Thank you for your support!

Follow Us on Twitter!