It's been more than 2 years since Congress let the Violence Against Women Act's authorization expire.
It's one of President Joe Biden’s signature issues ― and it’s still not clear how or if the Senate will get it done. huffpost.com/entry/violence…
Congress used to reauthorize VAWA with massive, bipartisan votes.
But Senate Republicans let it expire in 2019 because they didn't like the bill everyone else supported. Why? It expanded protections to LGBTQ and Native victims of violence + included a gun safety provision.
Senate Republicans were in such disarray over reauthorizing VAWA in 2019 that they couldn’t even agree with each other on what they wanted in their own bill. huffpost.com/entry/violence…
So, even though the House passed a bipartisan bill and Senate Dems supported it, VAWA's reauthorization expired.
This is the longest it's ever gone without being reauthorized.
It doesn’t mean the VAWA itself has expired.
It means uncertainty for its life-saving grant programs + no ability to update the law with protections that domestic violence advocates say are badly needed.
Updates like... helping Native women escape horrific levels of violence.
2021 is feeling a lot like 2019 on VAWA.
The House just passed a bill that is essentially the same as what it passed in 2019.
Senate Republicans are working on their own bill.
Senate Dems need 60 votes to pass something. So, 10 Republicans. Last time, they had 0.
Sen. Joni Ernst is taking the lead on the GOP bill again.
She told me a couple weeks ago that its text is almost done and that the bill is “very similar” to the 2019 bill.
That... does not bode well for this round of VAWA.
Some changes are underway though: Sen. Lisa Murkowski is working on the tribal portion of the GOP's VAWA bill. She could bridge Dems and GOP on this one.
I covered the VAWA reauth fight in 2012-2013 and, yet again, a sticking point for GOPers is the idea that tribes should have jurisdiction over non-Native men who abuse Native women on tribal land.
That nearly derailed the bill last time, and here we are again. Why?
Despite lots of GOP resistance, the 2013 VAWA reauthorization, for the first time, gave tribes jurisdiction over non-Native domestic abusers of Native women on tribal land.
That was huge and badly needed. Native women face horrific levels of domestic violence.
The House already passed its VAWA reauthorization bill last month. It was fast and bipartisan.
It would expand tribes' jurisdiction over non-Native men who commit violent offenses against Native women on tribal land, like sexual violence, sex trafficking and stalking.
That's a big deal. And also badly needed.
Anyway, Senate Republicans opposed doing this in 2019 and it's part of the reason why their bill went nowhere and why VAWA's authorization is still expired.
At the moment, I don't see how Senate Dems and GOPers agree on a VAWA reauth bill if the GOP won't accept new protections for Native women + LGBTQ people who need help.
VAWA is Biden's baby. Would not be surprised if he personally gets involved to get this done. He did in 2013.
This isn't in the news much yet, but I'll be watching this in the coming weeks. It matters a lot to Biden.
I think Murkowski will be key. “I’m working with everybody. Democrats, Republicans, independents, advocates. I want to get VAWA reauthorized.” huffpost.com/entry/violence…
One notable difference in the 2021 House VAWA bill: it now includes language making revenge porn -- when someone distributes sexually explicit images of someone without consent -- a federal crime.
@KatieHill4CA personally lobbied her former colleagues to add this to the bill.
Hill called key committee chairs -- Judiciary chair Nadler + Rules chair McGovern -- to urge them to address revenge porn in VAWA.
“I learned firsthand the devastating effects of this,” said Hill. “We knew that VAWA was the best chance of this happening... And it belongs in it.”
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
Ernst says Dems keep trying to "hijack" VAWA "for their own agenda on everything from gun control to sexual orientation."
On the gun control bit, she's referring to Dems trying to update VAWA so someone who has been *convicted* of abusing a person they're dating can't get a gun.
That provision, which would close the "boyfriend loophole," is in the bipartisan VAWA bill that the House passed last month.
It won't be in Ernst's alternative VAWA bill. Why?
The NRA opposes it + has warned a vote for it will negatively effect lawmakers' NRA ratings. (3/)
Interesting call just now with senior admin official on the thinking behind Biden's first batch of judicial nominees.
WH is clearly very proud of the diversity of these people. They should be. Lots of women, people of color and non-corporate lawyers.
Notable how much this WH seems eager to focus on the professional diversity of nominees -- something even Obama, for all his historic court picks, did not do.
Senior admin official said several times that public defenders + civil rights lawyers bring a "critical" perspective.
I asked where this particular push on professional diversity is coming from, whether it's people on the WH legal team, outside groups, etc.
"This comes from the president," said the senior admin official.
At last! Biden announced his first batch of judicial nominees this morning.
11 nominees.
10 are for appeals court and district court seats.
1 is for a superior court seat in DC.
Let's talk diversity in this mix.
3 African American women for appeals court seats. That's a big deal.
As of December (and I think it's still true), there are only 5 Black women judges out of the 179 currently confirmed to an appeals court seat.
Biden's mix of judicial nominees also includes someone who would be the first Muslim American federal judge in U.S. history, the first AAPI woman to serve on the DC district court and the first woman of color to serve as a federal judge in Maryland.
Alaska Republican Kelly Tshibaka announces she's running against Lisa Murkowski in 2022.
She's running far to the right of Murkowski.
Her ad dings Murkowski for voting for Deb Haaland, which... Alaska Sen. Dan Sullivan also did. And Alaska Rep. Don Young backed Haaland, too.
Here's Tshibaka on why people should elect her: "Nothing scares the D.C. political insiders more than the thought of a strong, independent Alaskan leader in their ranks. One they can’t bully. One they can’t control."
Isn't that describing... Murkowski?
For some context on Murkowski's steady and appreciated independent streak back home, a piece I reported out from Alaska in 2017. huffpost.com/entry/lisa-mur…
For years, Elizabeth Warren has been a lonely voice in the Senate on the need to pick people with all kinds of legal backgrounds -- not just corporate lawyers and prosecutors -- to be lifetime federal judges.
For all the historic court appointments Obama made, he didn't contribute much to professional diversity.
Warren called him out over it 2014, saying the courts badly needed more public defenders and civil rights attys on them.
She's got a new ally on this now: Joe Biden.
Biden's WH counsel wrote to Dem senators in Dec urging them to recommend court picks to the White House ASAP, and emphasizing Biden wants "public defenders, civil rights and legal aid attorneys, and those who represent Americans in every walk of life.”
Amazing that COVID hasn't come up at all yet in this Biden press conference, his first one as president.
Someone just asked if he's running for reelection though.
"My plan is to run for reelection."
Another question about whether Biden will run again in 2024 (yes). And with Harris (yes). And if he expects he'll run against Trump.
"I have no idea."
I get that people think Biden is handling COVID well, and that vaccinations are happening, that people are finally seeing a light at the end of this awful tunnel.
But we're still losing hundreds of Americans every day. Surely someone will ask for a progress report + path fwd.