House Democrats on FDR's court packing scheme in 1937:

"We recommend the rejection of this bill as a needless, futile, and utterly dangerous abandonment of constitutional principle."

"It is a proposal without precedent and without justification."
"It would subjugate the courts to the will of Congress and the President and thereby destroy the independence of the judiciary, the only certain shield of individual rights."
"It stands now before the country, acknowledged by its proponents as a plan to force judicial interpretation of the Constitution, a proposal that violates every sacred tradition of American democracy."
"It is a measure, which should be so emphatically rejected that its parallel will never again be presented to the free representatives of the free people of America."
"It is a proposal without precedent and without justification."

"... violates every sacred tradition of American democracy."

"Its ultimate operation would be to make this government one of men rather than one of law."

• • •

Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to force a refresh
 

Keep Current with David Harsanyi

David Harsanyi Profile picture

Stay in touch and get notified when new unrolls are available from this author!

Read all threads

This Thread may be Removed Anytime!

PDF

Twitter may remove this content at anytime! Save it as PDF for later use!

Try unrolling a thread yourself!

how to unroll video
  1. Follow @ThreadReaderApp to mention us!

  2. From a Twitter thread mention us with a keyword "unroll"
@threadreaderapp unroll

Practice here first or read more on our help page!

More from @davidharsanyi

5 Apr
The funny thing about this talking -- which I don't actually believe -- is that hardly any money in the bill goes to fix it. Use some of the $500 billion we already spend every year on this, instead of solar panels and Amtrak.
*point
The whole thing is a scam. No matter you bring up, they will make some other hyperbolic claim. 82 million people are "exposed" to asbestos!
Read 5 tweets
5 Apr
It's funny that one of the examples he offers in this piece -- filled with lies about the GA law -- I wrote not for NR but for *The Washington Post.*
At the end of the day, Chait doesn't believe black Americans can handle getting IDs like everyone else. It's shameful.
The thing is, even if everything he said about NR were true, it doesn't change what's in the GA law -- the thing he is lying about.
Read 4 tweets
17 Mar
You simply can't read a book about a rock band in the 1970s where the members weren't sleeping with young teenagers. Why aren't we canceling these people? I will join any campaign that helps stop "classic rock" from being played in supermarkets etc.
Most of it should have been canceled for sucking.
I hear another Doobie Brothers or Bad Company song I am going to lose it.
Read 6 tweets
8 Mar
It's the least racist country in the world.
I'm working on a book that makes this argument. Europe, for instance, is by every measure a worse place for minorities.
Read 5 tweets
6 Mar
Health care.
Every sport that matters.
Tech.
Retail.
Wealth.
Housing.
Read 4 tweets
28 Feb
Give me a break. They lionized him and covered for him for a year -- when it mattered and people were dying.
I wonder why he's a "liberal icon "
I mean, I wrote about the gaslighting in July; and I wasn't alone, obviously.
nationalreview.com/2020/07/the-sh…
Read 4 tweets

Did Thread Reader help you today?

Support us! We are indie developers!


This site is made by just two indie developers on a laptop doing marketing, support and development! Read more about the story.

Become a Premium Member ($3/month or $30/year) and get exclusive features!

Become Premium

Too expensive? Make a small donation by buying us coffee ($5) or help with server cost ($10)

Donate via Paypal Become our Patreon

Thank you for your support!

Follow Us on Twitter!