1/ 🧵 I want to take a moment to talk about hate & abuse that's directed at those of us who work in progressive politics or policy....
2/ I'm struggling with how to frame this thread. I don't want to come off as just complaining about some nasty comments at a time when there are so many larger injustices that folks -- particularly women and people of color -- confront every single day
3/ But I also don't want to stay silent. I don't want to normalize coordinated online attacks against me for simply being who I am. I don't want to accept daily directed hate as part of the cost of speaking out in our democracy. I want to find a proactive way of combating it.
4/ Here's what I'm talking about... every so often a right wing influencer posts content "debunking" or addressing some argument I've made about gun violence. Often times, they insert slurs about me being gay, Jewish, or Russian. And then their fans take it from there...
5/ Their fans email you. They slide into your DMs. They even try to go after your loved ones on social media. Their message is clear: I don't deserve to participate in the free exchange of ideas because I'm gay or Jewish or whatever.
Take a look.
6/ To be clear, I'm happy to engage in a good-faith policy debate with almost anyone. But that's clearly not what these folks are after.
Their goal, it seems to me, is to attack you *for who you are* in an effort to wound you personally and run you off the stage entirely
7/ I've been working in progressive politics since 2008 & focused on many hot button issues -- health care, LGBTQ rights, immigration, guns.
I'm used to receiving this garbage & generally speaking it doesn't bother me.
But I would be lying if I said it has had no impact on me
8/ I would also be lying if I said this problem of coordinated online hate isn't getting worse. It is.
When I first started working on Obamacare, I often appeared on Fox News or CNBC to argue with conservatives about this or that provision of the law....
9/ Yes, I would get some hate mail in response, but nowhere near the kind of volume and vitriol I now receive on a pretty regular basis.
Certainly there were far fewer coordinated online swarms designed to dox you or get pretty close to it...
10/ It's far worse now and so many folks are impacted by it.
So, I want to shine a light on this kind of activity so that we can see it, so we can confront it, and ultimately figure out how to fight against it.
11/ Because ultimately these coordinated online smears are damaging to our democracy, to our values as a country, and of course to us as individuals.
Thanks for hearing me out on this. ❤️
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
1/ I want to take a moment to highlight some of @POTUS' priorities for fighting the public health pandemic of gun violence in the administration's just-released skinny budget...they're really exciting! 🧵
@POTUS 2/ @POTUS is supporting existing programs to improve background check systems 👏
This is crucially important because the background check system has been strained by the surge in gun sales. (Note: during Trump, @FBI asked for more funding to keep up with the demand)
@POTUS@FBI 3/ @POTUS is seeking investment in new programs to incentivize State adoption of gun licensing laws.
10 states have licensing laws & we know that they're essential for ⬇️ gun violence & trafficking. (IE after CT implemented licensing, gun homicides ⬇️ 40%, gun suicides ⬇️ 15%)
@POTUS 2/ PLCAA came out of a slew of legal challenges in 1990s & early 2000s that culminated in an effort to sue gunmakers for continuing to knowingly sell guns to dealers who regularly funneled weapons to criminals and for failing to include safety features that could've saved lives.
@POTUS 3/ In 2000, Smith & Wesson settled several of these civil lawsuits and agreed to sell safety devices with its hand-guns and hold its authorized dealers to a certain code of conduct.
1/ Last week, after @JoeBiden said he'll focus on infrastructure rather than gun violence prevention as his next legislative priority, over 87 gun violence prevention organizations came together urging @POTUS to prioritize gun reform & Congress to work w/ him on it #TheTimeIsNow
@JoeBiden@POTUS 2/ We argued that @POTUS inherited a ⬆️ gun violence crisis & the country needed his leadership to save lives *now*
In fact, since his press conference on Thursday, we've experienced:
1/ I'm glad @POTUS connected the mass shooting in Atlanta to the "public health crisis of gun violence in this country" during his remarks
But I'll be honest -- I'm very disappointed that he didn't say more about the toxic combination of hatred & easy access to guns. Here's why
@POTUS 2/ The reality is that hate crimes in America often become deadly because guns are so easy to get.
In Georgia, it's easier to get a gun than to vote.
The alleged mass shooter in Georgia bought his gun THE VERY SAME DAY he killed 8 people
@POTUS 3/ We know that a whole array of gun violence prevention legislation -- from background checks to waiting periods to assault weapons bans -- can be very impactful in making it harder for bad actors to obtain firearms -- and save lives in the process.
"Local police officers have appeared at times to side with the Proud Boys, especially when they have squared off against leftists openly critical of law enforcement. "via @NYTimesnytimes.com/2021/03/14/us/…
Oh wow: “After a complaint from the Lawyers’ Committee for Civil Rights Under Law, the police department said the officer’s affiliation with the Proud Boys did not violate its policies, in part because it was not considered a white supremacist group”
“If the Proud Boys was not a white male chauvinist club but a Black male chauvinist club, I think that, sadly, we would have seen a different policing posture,” said Ms. Neumann, the former Homeland Security official.