Just finished @shigashide's book about how to improve bus service—it’s good!
Loads of useful info about operations as well as advocacy. And a surprisingly easy read.
Short 🧵:
2/ Here's an excellent rebuttal to those (like Gov Cuomo) who claim fancy stuff like USB ports and wifi will attract loads of new riders:
3/ @humantransit is a clear influence, so I wasn't surprised to find this stinging critique of microtransit:
“When existing bus routes are unreliable and slow, focusing attention on microtransit is like trying to perfect dessert at a restaurant that routinely burns the entrees.”
4/ I do wish the book's equity chapter went a bit deeper. Example: Advocates like @AyannaPressley (one of the book's heroines) push for fare-free transit—but most low-income riders say they'd prefer faster, more reliable service.
What are we to make of that?
5/ Overall, an accessible, informative read for those wanting to understand why bus service quality varies so widely across the USA.
TLDR: Stuff like bus shelters and realtime arrival info helps, but it mostly boils down to how quickly the bus can get you where you want to go.
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
Stuck at home, I've read more books in 2020 than I have since college. 20+ have been about cities and mobility.
Because I like making lists, these were my favorites:
[thread]
Order w/o Design is the clearest explanation I’ve seen about how transportation networks shape local economies—and why well-intentioned urban planning schemes often backfire.
Not a light read, but a brilliant one. Previous thread below.
.@SAShistorian's Policing the Open Road came out last year, but it already feels like a classic.
The American legal and criminal systems still haven’t figured out how to fit automobiles into the Fourth Amendment. Minorities and low-income residents pay the price.
Oversized SUVs and trucks are a growing menace to people outside of them-- including pedestrians, cyclists, and occupants of smaller cars.
A Biden admin can begin fixing this (even w/o the Senate).
Here's how. 🧵⤵️
Some context: The National Highway Traffic Safety Administration (NHTSA) evaluates the design of new autos through its influential New Car Assessment Program (NCAP)-- aka, "the one with the crash test dummies."
Automakers are eager to score valuable ⭐️⭐️⭐️⭐️⭐️ NCAP ratings.
2/
NCAP only looks at risk to a vehicle's occupants. Pedestrians, cyclists, and those in other cars don't count.
That gives automakers little incentive to protect vulnerable street users. Instead, they're in an arms race to design the biggest, tallest SUVs and trucks.
Fall seems to be the season for Mobility-as-a-Service panels and debates.
Speaking at several has led me to reflect on my own MaaS journey, summarized in the 🧵 below (w/article links).
TLDR: Despite great promise and hype, very few people use MaaS today. We need new models.
2/ I first learned about MaaS ~5 years ago. It offered a captivating vision: Leverage new technology to knit together trips on transit, bikeshare, carshare, scooters etc to improve cities and reduce private driving.
I was fascinated and wanted to learn more.
3/ 2 years ago I heard a top US transportation guru cite Helsinki as the future of urban mobility “because everyone there uses Whim, a MaaS app, to get around town.”
I then met several Finns who disagreed. That led to this article, my first about MaaS. citylab.com/perspective/20…