This notion being aggressively promoted by ABC’s political team—that Biden is betraying campaign promises by not allowing Republicans in the minority to dictate what parts of his agenda he’s allowed to do—is more doctrinaire than what you get from hardline party operatives.
What Biden said about being ‘transitional’ during the campaign, which Karl’s reel truncates pretty hilariously, was that he would be “a bridge” to a younger generation of *Democratic* politicians.
Biden’s platform was widely regarded as the most progressive of any Democratic nominee for president, thanks in large part to the committees he set up seeking unity with the supporters of the Sanders campaign.
These were called “unity task force committees,” but they weren’t promising unity with Mitch McConnell. politico.com/news/2020/07/0…
As Bryan suggests, there are other, more plausible routes to the kind of national consensus that passes for moderation than getting the congressional GOP—whose fortunes depend on Biden’s destruction—to bless his efforts. But you won’t hear that from ABC.
A 5-4 shadow docket covid restriction case gets a per curiam opinion that actually makes an argument for once. Roberts voted to deny. Kagan wrote a dissent, joined by the other two liberal justices. supremecourt.gov/opinions/20pdf…
The conservative majority is, as usual, big mad at the Ninth Circuit for being resolutely the Ninth Circuit.
The majority is so verbose in granting this injunction (almost 4 pages!) that the Supreme Court staff filed it on their website under “opinions of the court” rather than in the usual home of the shadow docket, “opinions relating to orders.”
Sotomayor writes that the court can’t update the Telephone Consumer Protection Act to protect telephone consumers from modern technology like Facebook’s, only Congress can. supremecourt.gov/opinions/20pdf…
I recommend reading Alito’s concurrence about the uselessness of the series qualifier canon, which I find persuasive and frustrating.
It’s frustrating because, in p typical Alito fashion, when he senses that his logic is taking him somewhere doesn’t want to go, he just doesn’t apply his reasoning to the case.
This piece rests on WaPo’s attribution of the recent surge in border crossings to Biden’s policy stances as the predominant driver of events and reticence to declare the Trump practice of expelling unaccompanied minors illegal, framing it instead as a useful but abandoned measure
Unfortunately for those arguments, WaPo published a piece that included this reporting six weeks before Biden took office. washingtonpost.com/immigration/mi…
It also seems to be WaPo’s sotto voce editorial position that “hundreds of families crowded into squalid camps” just outside US territory is a policy win, whereas letting them out of those camps and beginning a legal adjudication process is a failure.
The DC Circuit has announced that it is officially anti-Garamond.
It is possible Merrick Garland, like the little Dutch boy of legend, was holding back this tide of anti-Garamond sentiment single-handedly. Who’s to say?
ODNI report finds "prominent US individuals, including some close to former President Trump" were on the receiving end of "influence operations aimed at denigrating President Biden's candidacy" pushed by Russian intelligence. dni.gov/files/ODNI/doc…
The ICA assesses that "Putin had purview over the activities of Andriy Derkach," a Ukrainian legislator who met with Giuliani and is believed to have supplied information to the investigation of Hunter Biden by Sens. Johnson and Grassley.
The chairmen deny relying on his info.
"Derkach, Kilimnik, and their associates... helped produce a documentary that aired on a US television network in late January 2020."