Some more Sunday night TFATWS sleuthin'! Sharon Carter may be shady as hell, but she did NOT spend *several years* hidden in Madripoor building a criminal reputation. Endgame clearly showed her among the Blip victims. She was gone for 5 years, and since then, back for six months.
BUT... Sharon might not have *really* been gone, like Scott Lang, right? Nuh-uh. Scott was trapped *in another dimension*. If Sharon was hiding on Earth, the Avengers would have found her, like they found Hawkeye, or how poor Mr. Harrington eventually found his runaway wife.
But the CIA could have faked it, right? Nuh-uh. As shown by Tony and Rhodey blowing off Thaddeus Ross, and by Cap hiding Bucky in Wakanda, the Avengers' intelligence is wayyy more airtight than that of the US government.
But Sharon's "missing" photo doesn't have text underneath it on that screen, so she might not have really Blipped, right? Nuh-uh. In that angle of the screen, neither do Nick Fury or Maria Hill. Also, the angled corner of the projection didn't fill in that VFX detail.
But still, we didn't *see* Sharon Carter dust away, so can we really believe she did? YES. These screens also suggest to us that Erik Selvig, Jane Foster, and others Blipped. Are we to believe ALL of these were lies?
This is visual exposition. Not evidence of the opposite.
But Sharon said the Avengers abandoned her! I agree. Very weird. Cap totally would have contacted her while they were all on the run between Civil War and the Snap. Maybe Sam and Bucky were too busy over the past six months to contact her? I don't know. The line was odd.
But then how has Sharon amassed this wealth in six months? How is she so connected in Madripoor's criminal underworld, but had to pull a ton of strings to find Nagel, whom homeless Flag-Smashers were able to rip off? There must be a conspiracy!
...or, writing is hard.
But what if Sharon is working for Nick Fury... WHAT IF SHE'S A SKRULL?? Maybe! But her arc in TFATWS doesn't seem to be going in that direction. Would an alien shapeshifter bother dealing $$$ in stolen art, killing assassins in a shipyard... or just blend in, lay low, and report?
I still think Sharon Carter is super suspicious and there's more to her backstory. More involved with the Power Broker than she's letting on? Let's just not pretend other stuff in past movies didn't happen to fill what might just be re-edits or shifting narrative priorities.
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
This is an EXCELLENT question. When it comes to authorial intent, I always try to acknowledge it, but I don’t consider the author to be the final authority. Art’s meaning ultimately belongs to the masses. If a conflicting interpretation is backed by evidence, let’s hear it out.
Often my takes are disputed. That’s OK. For Tenet, I argued that two characters are actually the same person at different ages of their life. Despite the evidence, some argue Nolan didn’t intend that. I would argue he loves to play coy and keep tops spinning. So why not?
Tolkien rejected the interpretation of LOTR as an allegory for WWII. But as a man of his time, could he properly acknowledge how his time and place influenced his work? Seeing its political parallels don’t *replace* the Beowulf-influenced myth Tolkien intended to tell.