I’ve never understood the appeal of guns. People I know have tried to explain it to me and I still can’t. Like unless you’re a hunter or something, why do you want something that discharges small pieces of metal at speeds that can kill or permanently dismember/injure someone?
They’re like “what if someone breaks into your house?” and I’m like “I wouldn’t want to kill them over a break in, unless they broke in to try and kill me or my fiance. And even THEN, I’d want them subdued so they could be prosecuted and face consequences that are non-lethal.
I feel like it’s a compensation thing. Guns make insecure men feel more secure the same way a giant truck, expensive sports car, or a sock stuffed in their pants would. They sell the illusion of security when in reality they’re more likely to kill themselves or a family member.
It’s also about fear. Fox has a third of the country convinced that they need protection in this ridiculous form from other people in society who pose a threat to their safety and are “out to get them.” Guns are an industry that rests upon lies, misconceptions, fear & insecurity.
Get a tranquilizer gun. Or a stun gun. Or one of a million other options for protecting yourself that don’t involve potentially killing yourself, someone in your family; or even “an intruder.” And stop spending your life afraid of others because a network told you to be.

• • •

Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to force a refresh
 

Keep Current with Andrew Wortman 🏳️‍🌈

Andrew Wortman 🏳️‍🌈 Profile picture

Stay in touch and get notified when new unrolls are available from this author!

Read all threads

This Thread may be Removed Anytime!

PDF

Twitter may remove this content at anytime! Save it as PDF for later use!

Try unrolling a thread yourself!

how to unroll video
  1. Follow @ThreadReaderApp to mention us!

  2. From a Twitter thread mention us with a keyword "unroll"
@threadreaderapp unroll

Practice here first or read more on our help page!

More from @AmoneyResists

5 Apr
The @GOP is not the party of family values, fiscal conservatism, religious freedom, or anything even remotely resembling morality. @mattgaetz admitting to raping a minor made me realize we need a list of all Republicans who've been credibly accused of sexual misconduct (THREAD)
Let’s start with the ones who actually faced SOME degree of accountability for their illicit behavior and work up to those who still somehow occupy seats in the House of Representatives, the U.S. Senate, the Supreme Court, or the halls of Mar-a-Lago instead of a prison cell.
1.) Pat Meehan resigned on April 27, 2018, after months of misconduct allegations. Meehan used taxpayer money to pay off a former aide who accused him of sexual harassment. She claimed he tried to start a romantic relationship with her and became hostile when she rejected him.
Read 96 tweets
31 Mar
When I was younger, people oftened dismiss my political takes by saying “you just think that because your parents are Democrats.” While they certainly had an influence, my parents were all about letting my brother and I reach our own conclusions on things like religion & politics
This meant not only did I get to celebrate Christmas AND Hanukkah (until ultimately choosing Christmas solely on the basis that we generally got more than 8 gifts); I was given the chance to take a pretty impartial objective look at Democrats and Republicans from a very early age
The thing that stood out most to me from as far back as I can remember was how Democrats and left-leaning media outlets tried to tell the truth about most things; or at the very least answer the question they were asked; while Republicans & right-wing media did the exact opposite
Read 11 tweets
24 Mar
.@LeaderMcConnell: the filibuster started as a tool to uphold slavery and then became a mechanism to block civil rights legislation. It was created to preserve slavery against the march of progress and a growing majority of both states and Americans who wanted to abolish slavery.
The filibuster did not exist until the mid-19th century; well after the Founding Fathers. James Madison was an ardent opponent of even the notion of it. The individual credited with the introduction of the filibuster was was John C. Calhoun, the father of the Confederacy.
Calhoun invented the filibuster for the specific purpose of empowering slave owners and suppressing what was gaining traction as a superior economic model in the North. So he started to innovate forms of obstruction that became the filibuster. It was 100% rooted in racism.
Read 15 tweets
20 Mar
Things the @GOP has fully embraced under Donald Trump:
—Treason
—Corruption
—Organized Crime
—White supremacy
—Domestic Terrorism
—Armed Insurrections
—Gallows to hang Mike Pence
—Weaponizing the DOJ
—Over 500K American deaths

But getting rid of the filibuster is “too radical”?
They also endorsed (and continue to promote):
—No accountability for their elected officials
—Migrant children separated from their families and put in cages
—Banning of entire religions
—Baseless lies and racist anti-semitic conspiracy theories
—The destruction of the planet
—Denial of science & basic precautions against COVID
—Tax cuts for the rich
—Voter suppression, gerrymandering, & foreign attacks on our elections
—Fake crises rooted in xenophobia
—Unlimited access to firearms
—Cops killing POC w/ impunity
—Discrimination against LBGT Americans
Read 7 tweets
4 Mar
Since Republicans are on the losing side of EVERY ISSUE that matters to Americans—from increasing the wage, abortion rights, voting rights, & COVID relief—they manufacture fake scandals like “cancel culture” and give embarrassing floor speeches like THIS:
Republicans LOVE TO CANCEL THINGS. They have worked for decades to cancel everything from women’s reproductive rights, people of color’s voting rights and right not to be murdered by the police to more recently LGBT rights to marry & access to healthcare for millions of Americans
So no, the @GOP doesn’t want to “end cancel culture,” they merely want to misrepresent it to distract you from their unwavering desire to cancel everything that actually matters to and impacts our lives in any meaningful way.
Read 5 tweets
28 Feb
This man has never “sat down with real Americans in diners discussing the 10th Amendment.” I’d bet good money that most people in diners across America and certainly in this crowd couldn’t even tell you what the 10th Amendment states without googling it.
The 10th Amendment isn’t widely discussed or known because it’s had little relevance to political discourse. It simply states “The powers not delegated to the U.S. by the Constitution—nor prohibited by it to the States, are reserved to the States respectively, or to the people.”
The simple language of it emphasizes that the national gov’t remains one of limited and enumerated powers. When initially added to the Constitution in 1791, the 10th Amendment stood as a reminder of the continuing importance of states and of the foundational role of the people.
Read 7 tweets

Did Thread Reader help you today?

Support us! We are indie developers!


This site is made by just two indie developers on a laptop doing marketing, support and development! Read more about the story.

Become a Premium Member ($3/month or $30/year) and get exclusive features!

Become Premium

Too expensive? Make a small donation by buying us coffee ($5) or help with server cost ($10)

Donate via Paypal Become our Patreon

Thank you for your support!

Follow Us on Twitter!