I've been seeing a wave of evidence of burnout in my students the last few weeks, and reports I'm hearing from other faculty at my college suggest I'm not alone.
The second half of the Spring 2020 semester was pretty much a writeoff in my classes, but we were mostly on track and functioning in the fall. This semester? A lot more students starting to fall through the cracks.
I think the anniversary of the lockdown hit a lot of students really hard—when we went online in March 2020, it was presented as a temporary measure. Now we're well past a year with no end in sight.
(CUNY is nowhere close to an announcement of a return to in-person classes at this point. I'm expecting I'll most likely be teaching entirely online this fall, and I wouldn't be surprised if it extended past that.)
I'm doing pretty well as a teacher, I think, all things considered, but I'm hearing stories about faculty who are completely checked out—not returning emails, Zoom teaching with their cameras off and students muted, rejecting reasonable requests for accommodation out of hand.
And of course if you, as a student, have one professor like that, your ability to function in the rest of your classes is going to take a hit, too.
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
The next day, Chua released an open letter accusing the YDN of bungling the story and the law school administration of improperly leaking confidential files. abovethelaw.com/uploads/2021/0…
This afternoon, one of Chua's accusers released the following statement.
Among other things, this law would require a high school teacher to notify the parents of any 18-year-old student (or 20-year-old school employee) who used they/them pronouns.
(I don’t THINK it applies to college professors, based on the wording of the Bill, but I’m not certain.)
I say I don't think the bill applies to profs because the duty to report is one of "government agents," which is defined in such a way as to exclude professors.
This is important. Berenson often presents himself as a gadfly from within, drawing attention to studies and data that the media are downplaying because they don't fit the accepted narrative. But he's not that.
Every time Berenson says "Here's an important study you're not hearing about!", he's wrapping himself in the cloak of the people who wrote the study, using their expertise to give him weight.
Heading back down to Javits for the second shot today. Will livetweet again, though I expect it to be a much shorter and more boring story—from everything I've read, the lines pretty much evaporated about two weeks ago.
"They loved each other and believed they loved mankind, they fought each other and believed they fought the world."
—John le Carré, 1961, on British communists at Oxford in the 1930s.
BTW, I don't read this as a condemnatory quote. I recognize in it movements that I've been a part of, and movements that I have written about with love.
I initially followed the quote up with a "possible relevance to present-day internet subcultures is left for the reader to assess" tweet, but that wasn't (I promise!) intended as a specific subtweet of any particular group.
A lot of people I respect are wondering whether the Alexi McCammond incident means nobody can be forgiven for anything anymore. But it does strike me as a very particular situation. nytimes.com/2021/03/18/bus…
McCammond is 27, which means incidents from when she was a teenager are less than a decade old. And Teen Vogue is ... well, Teen Vogue, a lefty-multiculti magazine targeted at folks the age McCammond was when she sent the tweets.
Plus McCammond was a Wintour hire, which means any whiff of bigotry in her past was always going to take on outsized symbolic significance. theguardian.com/fashion/2020/j…