OK, let's talk about the warrant thing, since it's coming up in the Daunte conversation. Right now the conversation is grief and outrage and it feels inappropriate to dig in, but people are raising it, so there are some things you should know about "having a warrant out"
I was a public defender for the better part of a decade. I have represented thousands of people. People get warrants *all the time* everywhere for *all kinds of reasons*
Work
Job interview
School
No childcare
Sick
No transportation
And yes, sometimes bc they didn't want to go
The VAST MAJORITY of times I have seen warrants issued it's bc of things outside one's control (work, lack of transit, lack of childcare are the biggies). Forgetting is also a thing, and it's important to note that the #1 best way to stop that kind of warrant is...a text message.
But the connection that people are trying to draw here is somehow between warrants and *dangerousness*. That because this person had a warrant for an outstanding (misdemeanor mind you) weapons charge, police SHOULD be terrified.
People do react badly to police. Like I said, I've repped thousands of people, many accused of violent crime, weapons crime, you name it. I have only rarely felt unsafe. It's on par with how often you feel unsafe just normally being a woman walking down the street.
So why do people react badly to police? Well because police are armed and kill a lot of people, primarily BIPOC, so if you're dealing with police and you're not white you *know your life is on the line.*
That does not make for good interactions.
When I raise this challenge--that police are maybe *especially bad* choices for who should interface with civilians--people often try to make it personal. "Well would YOU want to go tell someone out on a warrant for a weapons case that they have to come in?"
I mean yes. I actually have. I have done so *a lot* because I cared bout my clients doing well and if someone missed court I would go check on them as needed. So yeah. I'm not a weirdo, I text first, but I am living proof that you can help *hundreds of people* come in on warrants
I have never owned a gun. I have never pepper sprayed anyone. I am generally pretty calm. I don't scare people because people don't *have a very fact-based fear that I might kill them* and so things go a hell of a lot better than they ever would with police.
All of which is to say, we don't need police to do 90% of the things we think we need them for, and the remaining 10% they are not doing so well at (check out homicide or rape clearance rates in most jurisdictions).
I am living proof of that, as are STAR, CAHOOTS, MACRO, and the Advocates of @PFJ_USA who care for our clients with level heads and open hearts and don't need guns to have a conversation.
So...I'm reflecting today on when defunding police results in reduced budgets and reallocation. And I'm thinking abotu what I learned about minimizing policing as a public defender. A short thread.
Obviously, the best world is when we replace policing with better, more restorative and beneficial resources and services for community members. But the first logical step in this journey is always cutting back on what we have police do. This actually already happens all the time
When I practiced in the Bronx, every once in a while the police would throw a fit and refuse to do anything more than "necessary" arrests. And we were all like...great? Should we *always* only be arresting people when necessary?
Just heard deputy Attorney General Rosen on @WYPublicRadio NORTH talking about the Purdue settlement. He said that the law doesn't allow you to strip someone of all of their assets because of wrongdoing, but you have to analyze the crime and have a proportionate response... 1/2
... would he please advise thousands of DAs across the nation who routinely strip people not only of their assets but of their right to vote or their right to parenthood on the basis of conduct far less serious than creating an opioid epidemic?
As always, my point is that we need to treat ordinary people better, not that we need to treat everybody worse. In case that wasn't obvious.
Hey, if you are wildly swept up in a new cycle that moves way too fast, like me, you may have missed the fact that D Cameron admitted the only charge he submitted to the Breonna Taylor grand jury was wanton endangerment.
This means the Attorney General knew that any grand jury was basically gonna indict those cops of whatever he put in front of them. So he didn't give them the option to hold anyone accountable for Taylor's death.
He lied to the people of his state.
He lied to you.
He walked into a space where he was supposed to be a prosecutor and did not carry out his duty, as that duty would be carried out against any ordinary person.
I know we're all tied up with national stuff right now, but is anyone paying attention to what's happening with that juvenile jail NSI in Wyoming, where kids are fleeing and terrified and the state decided that "the market would decide" if their "therapeutic" techniques are good?
This is a facility that was nearly shut down in Michigan for causing the death of a young man. A chain of kid jails that is currently being investigated. And the state of Wyoming thinks the market will decide if this is a problem?
I'm sorry... kids are not widgets. They're not for sale and their treatment and care should not be decided by whether or not people *purchase the services* of a child prison.