OK, let's talk about the warrant thing, since it's coming up in the Daunte conversation. Right now the conversation is grief and outrage and it feels inappropriate to dig in, but people are raising it, so there are some things you should know about "having a warrant out"
I was a public defender for the better part of a decade. I have represented thousands of people. People get warrants *all the time* everywhere for *all kinds of reasons*

Work
Job interview
School
No childcare
Sick
No transportation
And yes, sometimes bc they didn't want to go
The VAST MAJORITY of times I have seen warrants issued it's bc of things outside one's control (work, lack of transit, lack of childcare are the biggies). Forgetting is also a thing, and it's important to note that the #1 best way to stop that kind of warrant is...a text message.
Look ma a citation for that abajournal.com/lawscribbler/a…
But the connection that people are trying to draw here is somehow between warrants and *dangerousness*. That because this person had a warrant for an outstanding (misdemeanor mind you) weapons charge, police SHOULD be terrified.
People do react badly to police. Like I said, I've repped thousands of people, many accused of violent crime, weapons crime, you name it. I have only rarely felt unsafe. It's on par with how often you feel unsafe just normally being a woman walking down the street.
So why do people react badly to police? Well because police are armed and kill a lot of people, primarily BIPOC, so if you're dealing with police and you're not white you *know your life is on the line.*

That does not make for good interactions.
When I raise this challenge--that police are maybe *especially bad* choices for who should interface with civilians--people often try to make it personal. "Well would YOU want to go tell someone out on a warrant for a weapons case that they have to come in?"
I mean yes. I actually have. I have done so *a lot* because I cared bout my clients doing well and if someone missed court I would go check on them as needed. So yeah. I'm not a weirdo, I text first, but I am living proof that you can help *hundreds of people* come in on warrants
I have never owned a gun. I have never pepper sprayed anyone. I am generally pretty calm. I don't scare people because people don't *have a very fact-based fear that I might kill them* and so things go a hell of a lot better than they ever would with police.
All of which is to say, we don't need police to do 90% of the things we think we need them for, and the remaining 10% they are not doing so well at (check out homicide or rape clearance rates in most jurisdictions).
I am living proof of that, as are STAR, CAHOOTS, MACRO, and the Advocates of @PFJ_USA who care for our clients with level heads and open hearts and don't need guns to have a conversation.

theappeal.org/traffic-enforc…

• • •

Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to force a refresh
 

Keep Current with Emily Galvin-Almanza

Emily Galvin-Almanza Profile picture

Stay in touch and get notified when new unrolls are available from this author!

Read all threads

This Thread may be Removed Anytime!

PDF

Twitter may remove this content at anytime! Save it as PDF for later use!

Try unrolling a thread yourself!

how to unroll video
  1. Follow @ThreadReaderApp to mention us!

  2. From a Twitter thread mention us with a keyword "unroll"
@threadreaderapp unroll

Practice here first or read more on our help page!

More from @GalvinAlmanza

19 Nov 20
So...I'm reflecting today on when defunding police results in reduced budgets and reallocation. And I'm thinking abotu what I learned about minimizing policing as a public defender. A short thread.
Obviously, the best world is when we replace policing with better, more restorative and beneficial resources and services for community members. But the first logical step in this journey is always cutting back on what we have police do. This actually already happens all the time
When I practiced in the Bronx, every once in a while the police would throw a fit and refuse to do anything more than "necessary" arrests. And we were all like...great? Should we *always* only be arresting people when necessary?
Read 9 tweets
11 Nov 20
Like, if you find yourself confused, ask yourself:

Does it have a face?
Can it cry?
Can I hug it?
Does it have a favorite food?
Does it ever go to the doctor?

These are all helpful ways to tell if something might be a person, should you find yourself in the struggle.
I was careful to make my standard inclusive. Notice that dolphins are probably people.

But Waffle Heaven is not.
Read 4 tweets
4 Nov 20
I'm just sitting here thinking about how utterly disgusting it is the @LADAOffice let @IamMRMOSELY out of jail as soon as the voters repudiated Lacey

Just confirms prosecutorial decision making based on what they can get away with rather than what is right
OH MY GOD PEOPLE READ THE TWEET

I am CELEBRATING Drakeo getting out and CALLING OUT HOW CORRUPT THE PROSECUTORS ARE
Context: my prior writing on why everything about gang prosecution and the Drakeo case is racist af

theappeal.org/drakeo-califor…
Read 4 tweets
22 Oct 20
Just heard deputy Attorney General Rosen on @WYPublicRadio NORTH talking about the Purdue settlement. He said that the law doesn't allow you to strip someone of all of their assets because of wrongdoing, but you have to analyze the crime and have a proportionate response... 1/2
... would he please advise thousands of DAs across the nation who routinely strip people not only of their assets but of their right to vote or their right to parenthood on the basis of conduct far less serious than creating an opioid epidemic?
As always, my point is that we need to treat ordinary people better, not that we need to treat everybody worse. In case that wasn't obvious.
Read 4 tweets
2 Oct 20
Hey, if you are wildly swept up in a new cycle that moves way too fast, like me, you may have missed the fact that D Cameron admitted the only charge he submitted to the Breonna Taylor grand jury was wanton endangerment.

washingtonpost.com/nation/2020/09…
This means the Attorney General knew that any grand jury was basically gonna indict those cops of whatever he put in front of them. So he didn't give them the option to hold anyone accountable for Taylor's death.
He lied to the people of his state.

He lied to you.

He walked into a space where he was supposed to be a prosecutor and did not carry out his duty, as that duty would be carried out against any ordinary person.
Read 12 tweets
28 Sep 20
I know we're all tied up with national stuff right now, but is anyone paying attention to what's happening with that juvenile jail NSI in Wyoming, where kids are fleeing and terrified and the state decided that "the market would decide" if their "therapeutic" techniques are good?
This is a facility that was nearly shut down in Michigan for causing the death of a young man. A chain of kid jails that is currently being investigated. And the state of Wyoming thinks the market will decide if this is a problem?
I'm sorry... kids are not widgets. They're not for sale and their treatment and care should not be decided by whether or not people *purchase the services* of a child prison.
Read 17 tweets

Did Thread Reader help you today?

Support us! We are indie developers!


This site is made by just two indie developers on a laptop doing marketing, support and development! Read more about the story.

Become a Premium Member ($3/month or $30/year) and get exclusive features!

Become Premium

Too expensive? Make a small donation by buying us coffee ($5) or help with server cost ($10)

Donate via Paypal Become our Patreon

Thank you for your support!

Follow Us on Twitter!