When you look at reviews of the Surface Pro, tech writers will usually grouse at Microsoft for not including a keyboard in the price but they never make the same complaint about the iPad Pro. Its not-included kbd is far more limited & much more expensive but you never hear that.
Any iPhone review should also deduct points from its numeric rating as well because of its non-standard Lightning connector, especially when Apple doesn't put them on laptops. Total lock-in trap.
MacBook laptops should also be dinged in reviews for lacking a touch screen. It's a fantastic feature that Apple deliberately refuses to let its users have. It should be penalized by tech reviewers for this. I've yet to see that done.
Sometimes Apple is criticized for not allowing iPhones to accept storage cards but this should be in every review. And likewise, the 80s calculator watch design and poor interface of the Apple Watch is never criticized. The watches of Samsung and Garmin are far superior.
Likewise, the tech press was horribly late to the party in discussing what absolute trash the old MacBook "butterfly" keyboards were. Users were revolting over them for weeks before the tech media started criticizing Apple for the horribly uncomfortable design.
Aside from product concerns, it should also be pointed out that when it comes to complying with authoritarian governments, Apple is one of the worst large tech companies but faces very little of the scrutiny that Google or Facebook do for it.
I think Apple is doing a lot of great things in terms of CPUs, old device support, and privacy for Westerners but it's far from a perfect company. The U.S. tech press lives in fear of pissing Apple off so you don't hear about its many problems.
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
Ellis is more open about her theocratic agenda than most right wing elites but she is far from alone in having one.
Most are more savvy in hiding their true intentions and only discussing them privately.
Unfortunately, because of this concealment, most people who disagree with fundamentalist Christianity aren't aware that many top Republicans have "Christianist" views that are philosophically not different from Islamism.
Check out the production on this clip. It's just as WTF as the manic words Peter Navarro is spewing. He literally looks like some sort of cross between WWE and Infowars.
The exaggerated hand jestures, the wide-angle standup shot with stars.
Peter Navarro in his stand up studio doing one of several over-the-top double-finger pointing gestures just exactly like a WWE monologue. This dude was one of Trump's top presidential advisers. Wow.
Yes exactly. The only thing Peter Navarro is missing is Mean Gene standing next to him holding the microphone
So much for democracy: MO Republicans vote to throw out 53% referendum vote that expanded Medicaid eligibility.
One state rep. says she thinks it's ok because only suburban & urban Missourians approved it. “Rural Missouri said no,” Rep. Sara Walsh said. kansascity.com/news/politics-…
Republicans in Georgia and Alabama get all the headlines but Missouri Republicans are their own kind of terrible. They literally passed a bill in 2017 to *lower* the minimum wage snopes.com/fact-check/mis…
In addition to electing the openly Christian supremacist and insurrection-enabler Josh Hawley, they also have a guy running for Senate, Eric Greitens, who was accused of sexual violence and blackmailing a paramour and earlier had to resign for it.
In case you missed it, Gab got hacked again, by the same intruder after it failed to revoke admin session tokens.
More proof that the faulty cognitive processes that lead to belief in illogical ideas also makes it harder for them to spread w/o help arstechnica.com/information-te…
Deplatforming works as a societal protection mechanism because extremists cannot disseminate their views effectively unless others build the platforms for them.
Their broken-brain understanding of reality also means that they can't build propaganda infrastructure.
You can't effectively change reality unless you actually understand it. But if competent and normal people make giant social networks and then let you use them for free and without consequence, you don't have to learn a thing. They've subsidized your insanity.
The entire concept and history of the word "RINOs" is about silencing dissent. Conservatives invented "cancel culture."
The whining about it today is only because it happens to them sometimes now. They think only others should be canceled.
Don't be surprised also if Trump's tantrum about "RINOs" and the GOP turns out to be nothing more than a ploy to force the RNC to pay him money to use his name.
The cash for Trump angle is very important here. He has millions of dollars in debt coming due but no banks want to loan him money to refinance it.
While Trump did con supporters into giving "election defense" millions, he can't legally use it since it was PAC donations.