1/ A founder recently asked about my experience building culture. I think there are a ton of ways to build a great culture- and many approaches are situation/team/stage-specific. Here were my thoughts:
2/ First, there isn’t one right answer. Every co. and set of founders will have their own approach, and mostly these are just questions to ask or things to consider – definitely not meant to be prescriptive advice.
3/ I think culture starts first with mission/vision. I use this framework- *which is not linear* and not perfect, but I found helpful for me as founder/CEO:
4/ I don’t think setting mission/vision is a group exercise. I think it is typically set by the founder(s). It can evolve over time with input, but having crisp definition and clarity initially is important for aligning stakeholders.
5/ It draws investors/teammates/partners/customers to you that are aligned with that mission/vision.
6/ Next I think it is key to define the Company’s values, also a founder exercise IMO. Values clearly defined will act as a framework to help determine who you hire, who/what you reward, which customers and investors you work with – and which you decide to not work with.
7/ I cannot stress this enough- this is not apple pie and Golden Retrievers- this is the heart of the company. I think the more you invest into nailing this with authenticity and consistency the greater chance of success for your culture (and company).
8/ Then I think it is designing the org structure, defining hiring traits and recruiting.
9/ Recruiting effectively is vital for culture. Expect difficult questions w. every hire. “X has more experience but Y is more aligned with our hiring traits.” Every co in existence has had someone say “yes we care about diversity but we can’t wait any longer for this hire….”
10/ How you respond in those moments sets a tone for the culture- to say nothing of the people you decide to hire.
11/ Don’t fall into the stale “hire the best engineers in the Valley” saying. 1) First, the best engineers often aren’t in the Bay Area anymore- that’s outdated advice,
12/ 2) you need to be practical – you likely aren’t splitting atoms and you likely can’t get the best even if you were, 3) “the best” isn’t a hiring trait. You and someone else on the hiring panel will define that differently.
13/ You need to more clearly define what the hiring traits are and provide examples of how to identify them. I remember having dinner several ago with the heads of engineering from two deca-unicorns.
14/ Now you have mission/vision, you have clearly defined values and hiring traits, you have an org structure and hiring strategy/tactics. You also need to begin to set up feedback (formal and informal) and reward mechanisms (intrinsic and extrinsic).
15/ Feedback: Feedback structure- I think healthy teams give each other feedback in all directions, formally and informally. Lots of ways to accomplish this. We did 1:1s every other week and written reviews 2x per year. Also 360s so teammates could give managers (and me) feedback
16/ Feedback norms: We never wanted someone to get feedback for the first time in a review. Sometimes we failed at that, but it was our goal. To do that ongoing feedback either in 1:1s or more informally is critical.
17/ What do you provide feedback on: Do you focus on Inputs or Outputs? I don’t think there is a right answer, and it depends on the company, but here are my views:
18/ Other considerations: How do you bring your Values into your feedback sessions? How do you ensure people are giving clear, direct and transparent feedback in all directions? (incredibly hard and IMO important)
19/ Reward mechanisms: what are you rewarding and how are you rewarding? What you reward: This connects back to Inputs v. Outputs. Consistency and transparency in what is being rewarded is key for lots of reasons including creating a culture of focusing on drivers of success.
20/ In addition, there are surveys that show the people that don’t see a connection between their Inputs and the Outputs get burnt out more easily.
21/ How are you rewarding: Yes there is cash comp and equity. A few yrs into our journey we started using third-party benchmarks (Options Impact, Radford are 2) that could help us see roughly what “market” is for each position, then setting a target percentile within that range.
22/ If you want to pay 99th percentile for every position you’ll be out of money soon. I found that aligning up front (i.e. we pay 70th percentile- or whatever the answer is) helps ensure the process is fair and transparent.
23/ Also-using 3rd party benchmarks and a clearly defined comp system helps important D&A initiatives.
24/ I’ve also found that non-monetary rewards really matter. If they didn’t most people wouldn’t work at startups. Pride and mission matter. Culture matters. Growth - personal and professional, company and individual, matters.
25/ Giving people responsibility/ownership over projects they couldn’t get elsewhere matters. Thus it is imp to create frameworks that allow them to truly take ownership over getting something done- and to prevent micromanaging.
26/ Celebrating (Inputs or Outputs), both internally and externally, matters. How do you celebrate wins? Frankly this was something I don’t think I did well at all- and I regret that. I tried to directly in 1:1 meetings, with a walk by of someone’s desk and with emails/notes.
27/ We also tried to celebrate in front of the company and helped individuals, and teams, get PR to celebrate things publicly (articles, blogs, panels, etc).
28/ But I’m not good at celebrating wins- I move on to the next thing immediately and so my celebrations come off as stale and inauthentic sometimes. I have tried to be better and I wish I were more effective at that.
29/ Adjusting the ship:
A product, team, career, company inevitably needs adjustments and pivots along the way. That’s a good thing IMO- and shows that the person is listening to data and adjusting their approach based on feedback.
30/ That will require hard conversations- how can you set the tone for that both in a willingness to give and receive hard feedback. We had managers read out the output of their 360s to their teams- so the teams knew what feedback the manager had heard.
31/ Inevitably some people and products wont work out. How do you make hard decisions swiftly? I’ve found one of the most difficult parts of letting someone go, other than the obvious pain for the person directly involved, was what and how to communicate to rest of the company.
32/ In our history we typically allowed people that were fired to tell the rest of the company whatever story they wanted. Sometimes, frankly often, that caused short-term pain, but we believed it was the right thing to do to allow the person to leave with dignity.
33/ When great people see a culture that isn’t willing to cut bait on a product that isn’t working, or a teammate that isn’t having the impact anyone would want, those great people typically leave.
34/ There are so many other parts of what makes a culture but (right or wrong) those were some of the major areas we tried to focus on.
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
1/ Over the past year I’ve had a meaningful increase in the # of conversations with new college or MBA grads, or those thinking of going to graduate school. Almost all center around “what should I do?” or “is XXX the right first step if I want to do YYYY”.
2/ A common theme I’ve seen is people buying optionality. To be fair I don’t think this is a generational thing. I did the same out of college in working at BCG. I typically have a thoughts based on my experience.
3) First- The ongoing siren call of optionality and the safety nets in business school/McKinsey/Goldman are very hard to turn down, particularly for Type A students who are used to getting a pat on the back from Grandma.
1/ For the first 10 years of my professional life I was taught to hire based on the airport test. It basically means "would you want to get stuck in an airport for a few hours with this person."
I now think that test both creates bias and is counterproductive.
I *hate* it.
2/ I think the "airport test" leads people to hire others that "look" like them. I don't just mean demographically (though that's part of it- consciously &/or unconsciously). I also mean people that have similar interests outside of work, senses of humor, etc.
3/ The vagueness of the test also leads to an inconsistent measurement across candidates. Interviewer X cant define what the "airport test" is to Interviewer Y because they both have different definitions which might change depending upon their mood.
1/ In preparation for my transition away from CEO in October, I had done research on how others navigated similar transitions. Since then others have asked that work. Here is a summary of that research and some of my learnings about the transition.
2/ For context: I talked to about 15 CEOs that transitioned out of their role. Some got fired, some had companies that folded up, some sold their company for billion(s) and some ran public companies. It was purposefully a wide range.
3/ I also did a fair amount of reading. I won't summarize it all- but this book was by far the best. Would recommend it to anyone going through a transition of any kind (moving, changing jobs, divorce, death), or supporting someone who is:
1/ I love this question and I believe it's much harder than most CEOs think initially. I think teammates of varying backgrounds and learning styles absorb complex information differently- and I've found that discussing strategy as a team is not straightforward for most.
2/ I am a fan of talking about it frequently and in different formats. As CEO I tried to do it every 6 weeks as a co and for the formats to change. Sometimes presentation, sometimes fireside Q&A, sometimes panel w/ heads of teams talking about strategy, small and large groups etc
3/ The repetition helped teammates absorb, think about it and have it ingrained. They also could see evolutions over time- which are inevitable for a startup- and not have those iterations feel like giant pivots (as they may if only talked about strategy 1x-2x per yr)
1/ One of the more helpful frameworks I’ve seen as an operator and investor was taught to me by one of our advisors a few yrs ago. When there is a problem, try diagnosing from the top down:
Mission
Vision
Strategy
Culture
People
Tactics
Product
Distribution
Sales
Marketing
2/ The original framework is applicable for a certain type of biz. What I show above is my adaptation for startups. I like using this when there is confusion or misalignment. Basic concept is to start at top and see if there is alignment. If yes move to vision, then strategy etc.
3/ Eventually (often higher than the we would like to hear) the misalignment is identified. While we think we are talking about a difference in [Sales] tactics, it turns out there is actually a difference in [Strategy] alignment.