In 2008, Nicholas Carr wrote a seminal article for The Atlantic, “Is Google Making Us Stupid?”

In the 13 years since then, digital technology has become only more pervasive and more integrated into our thinking processes—for better and for worse. But we know a lot more now. 1/9
In place of what was mostly speculation on Carr’s part, there is now a booming field of empirical research into exactly HOW and WHEN and WHY our encounters with technology influence our thinking.

For example: this new study from researchers at the University of Tübingen. 2/9
The study examines the pluses and minuses of "cognitive offloading"—the act of allowing our devices to hold information or perform operations for us that would usually happen inside our own heads. 3/9
Offloading DOES improve immediate performance: we do the job faster, more accurately, and with fewer errors.

At the same time, it reduces longer-term memory performance. When we offload, we process the information less deeply, and so we’re apt to forget it more easily. 4/9
There is a way around this trade-off, researchers note. When participants were forced to engage in offloading during a task, but were told that they would be tested later on the offloaded information, they reaped the benefits of offloading AND accurate memory. 5/9
This research is an example of the very practical guidance this new generation of research has to offer—to wit:

If your goal is focused solely on immediate performance, offload away.

If your goal is focused on longer-term memory performance, you have one of two choices. 6/9
One: AVOID offloading, thereby organically introducing the kind of "desirable difficulties" that promote memory (when we work hard to process information, we tend to remember it better). 7/9
Two: Engage in offloading, but FORM THE INTENTION to remember the information you're offloading. Both strategies are effective.

Is Google making us stupid? Only if we let it! 8/9
Here's the study from the University of Tübingen: bit.ly/2ORjaLX

And here's Nicholas Carr's article, still a classic: bit.ly/3e90qjN

• • •

Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to force a refresh
 

Keep Current with Annie Murphy Paul

Annie Murphy Paul Profile picture

Stay in touch and get notified when new unrolls are available from this author!

Read all threads

This Thread may be Removed Anytime!

PDF

Twitter may remove this content at anytime! Save it as PDF for later use!

Try unrolling a thread yourself!

how to unroll video
  1. Follow @ThreadReaderApp to mention us!

  2. From a Twitter thread mention us with a keyword "unroll"
@threadreaderapp unroll

Practice here first or read more on our help page!

More from @anniemurphypaul

14 Apr
So powerful is the effect of gesturing while learning that it can improve learners’ comprehension of a complex concept, EVEN WHEN they are not aware of the connection between the concept and the gesture they've been instructed to make.
1/8
Simply making a conceptually-congruent gesture while they’re learning about the concept helps clarify and reinforce the concept—forming a second channel of instruction that’s independent of the verbal one.
2/8
Matthew Hutson writes about "hand movements’ subconscious effects on learning" in a new article for Scientific American. He describes a study led by Icy (Yunyi) Zhang of UCLA, recently published in the journal Cognitive Science.
3/8
Read 8 tweets
13 Apr
UNC-Chapel Hill has the monument known as the Old Well. Penn State has the building known as Old Main. UVA has the Rotunda, designed by Thomas Jefferson.

All of these are "iconic spaces" on university campuses—but who uses them? Who feels that they belong there? 1/8 Image
Researchers led by UVA psychologist Sophie Trawalter recently examined the relationship between students' socioeconomic status and their use of iconic public space. Lower-SES students were less likely to feel that they belonged in these spaces, and less likely to use them. 2/8
(Notably, the researchers found similar patterns by race: students of color use iconic public space on campus less than do white students and, in turn, this predicts lower sense of belonging at the university.) 3/8
Read 8 tweets
3 Apr
It's been a really weird year for college students. In thinking about the kind of supports they need, there's one we often overlook: their personal connection to the PLACE where they live.
1/6
Benjamin Meagher, a psychologist at Kenyon College, recently published a paper in which he examined the relationship between college students' psychological well-being and the degree of "place identity" they experience in regard to their housing.
2/6
Place identity, he writes, "is characterized by the extent to which a setting reflects, reinforces, and communicates the identity of its resident"—in short, it's a feeling of connection with one’s physical setting.
3/6
Read 6 tweets
2 Apr
Andy Clark is one of the world's most interesting thinkers, and I'm always curious to hear what he's thinking about NOW. (With fellow philosopher David Chalmers, Clark proposed the theory of the extended mind, and is the author of "Supersizing the Mind," among other books.)
1/10 Image
Anthony Wing Kosner recently published an article about the extended mind, featuring an interview with Clark. It includes a number of gems—such as Clark's suggestion that the isolation imposed by the pandemic has driven us further into what he calls "brainbound" thinking.
2/10
"Intense digital home-working scenarios could feed a kind of isolationist user-illusion, enhancing our native tendencies to a kind of dualism" between the mind and its environment, Clark told Kosner.
3/10
Read 10 tweets
2 Apr
When engineers and architects tackle complex spatial problems, does all the action take place inside their heads? Not at all, write a team of learning scientists from Northwestern University. Such experts “don’t solve these problems just by manipulating mental models."
1/7 Image
"They solve them through the coordinated manipulation of both internal and external representations”—like sketches, models, and even hand gestures. But the instruction we offer students fails to develop the outside-the-brain thinking skills used by real-world experts.
2/7
“Traditional school mathematics privileges analytic approaches (i.e., formulas and calculations) over spatial ones (i.e., graphs, models, and diagrams)," the Northwestern researchers note in a recent paper.
3/7
Read 7 tweets
1 Apr
When engineers and architects tackle complex spatial problems, does all the action take place inside their heads? Not at all, write a team of learning scientists from Northwestern University. Such experts “don’t solve these problems just by manipulating mental models." 1/7 Image
"They solve them through the coordinated manipulation of both internal and external representations”—like sketches, models, and even hand gestures. But the instruction we offer students fails to develop the outside-the-brain thinking skills used by real-world experts. 2/7
“Traditional school mathematics privileges analytic approaches (i.e., formulas and calculations) over spatial ones (i.e., graphs, models, and diagrams)," the Northwestern researchers note in a recent paper. 3/7
Read 7 tweets

Did Thread Reader help you today?

Support us! We are indie developers!


This site is made by just two indie developers on a laptop doing marketing, support and development! Read more about the story.

Become a Premium Member ($3/month or $30/year) and get exclusive features!

Become Premium

Too expensive? Make a small donation by buying us coffee ($5) or help with server cost ($10)

Donate via Paypal Become our Patreon

Thank you for your support!

Follow Us on Twitter!