Phenomenal paper from the @jbloom_lab exploring neutralization by antibodies from recovered versus vaccinated individuals and examining all possible mutations at the receptor binding motifa—the portion that binds to ACE2–of the virus.
Using yeast display technology, where the yeast fluoresces, they expressed a few thousand mutant versions of the spike protein receptor binding domain and exposed each mutant to serum from convalescent vs. vaccinated individuals.
They then took key mutants and infected ACE2-expressing cells with pseudotyped lentiviruses producing each key receptor binding domain.
They found that vaccinated serum was more potent at abolishing infection in the pseudotyped lentivirus infections than convalescent serum with the new spike mutation variants out there.
I think further studies examining how ACE2 and potentially disease-enhancing antibodies and their titers play a role in pathogenesis as strains evolve will be necessary going forward, and in the interim these are encouraging findings for new strains.
Will also be good to explore infection-enhancing antibodies being of very high titer and playing a role in potential disease enhancement with ACE2 shielding the neutralizing sites. I have not seen this studied enough.
Group IV antibodies against the RBD can show neutralizing activity while also acting as Fc-dependent infection-enhancing antibodies via antibody-dependent enhancement, and that mutations in these sites can yield enhanced binding.
In the above "Enhancement versus neutralization by SARS-CoV-2 antibodies...", some mutants in the ~370-385 range, as well as 342 and 339 AA positions of the RBD, can lead to enhanced binding of these neutralizing Class IV antibodies that can potentially be disease enhancing.
It will be important to factor in the increased KD (binding affinity) of some of the new strains against the ACE2 receptor and therefore the reduced neutralization potential of antibodies against these sites. Couple this to Class IV antibody infection-enhancement.
In the paper referenced in the original post from the Bloom lab, 2/14 of the vaccine recipients had greatest sensitivity to mutations at these Class IV sites... what does this mean? We will need to look at how this affects emerging strain immunity.
Producing extremely high titers of antibodies against all sites of the RBD, in a way that is greater than the more RBM-focused antibody generation against actual infection, could yield disease enhancement down the line.
More focus on the immune evasive, potential infection-enhancing, and ACE2 competition with antibody binding is warranted. Certainly, immunity is not binary — and there are many very good antibodies produced by vaccination, which is why we are seeing such strong clinical results.
It's important to emphasize that the vaccine efficacy is extremely high, and that clinical results are currently showing that all vaccines are extremely protective against severe and lethal COVID. This is something to keep in the back of our minds, though.
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
Compiling some research on risk of antibody-dependent enhancement (#ADE)...
It's important to emphasize that this does not reflect support of vaccine hesitance, and that the data on vaccine efficacy is extremely good.
[Thread on recent scientific articles to keep in mind...]
It would be good to include broader antibody panels separating "good" neutralizing antibodies from potentially deleterious antibodies and correlating this to strain emergence... the concern is not just the neutralizing sites at the ACE2-binding interface and "good" antibodies.
While the public health benefit of vaccines is huge, and COVID is orders of several magnitude more dangerous to older populations than vaccination, we should remain vigilant about these potential issues emerging over time, and preempt the problem with better immunomodulators.
THREAD
“Most people who recover from COVID-19 develop immune memory that lasts for at least six to eight months, a NIAID-funded study suggests. The findings, published today in Science, are based on analysis of blood samples from 188 people who recovered from infection.” - NIAID
“Neutralizing antibodies have generally not correlated with lessened COVID-19 disease severity... Instead, neutralizing antibodies are associated with protective immunity against secondary infection with SARS-CoV-2.”
“While sterilizing immunity against viruses can only be accomplished by high-titer neutralizing antibodies, successful protection against clinical disease or death can be accomplished by several other immune memory scenarios.”
1/4 SARS-CoV-2 Orf6 appears to hijack nuclear import machinery, inhibiting nuclear translocation of key signaling and cell proliferation molecules such as STAT1 and STAT2. This is another way that SARS-CoV-2 downregulates intracellular immune responses such (e.g. interferon --).
2/4 These findings also meld with prior data demonstrating nuclear translocation of SARS-CoV-2. Coupled, these data suggest that the virus has evolved multiple mechanisms for avoiding both extracellular adaptive immune responses, as well as intracellular immunity / host defenses.
3/4 These findings could also lead to future discoveries about the genesis and pathogenesis of "long COVID" and repeat infections, coupled to the discovery of SARS-CoV-2 building up deep in tissues that are not as accessible to the immune system.
After hours at the DMV, at closing, a DMV employee comes out and says “All hope is lost, there is no point, everyone should go home.” I said that’s the most earnest, honest depressing thing I’ve heard all day.
“Well, it could be worse. You could have my job,” she says.
“Sorry, we are at full capacity.” (4:30 PM)
This is the sixth time I’ve tried to go to the DMV to renew my license.
We took this image of CRISPR-Cas9 (green) being delivered to a T cell using our targeting peptide tech, which was the first demonstration of CRISPR delivery to a primary human T cell with a non-viral nanocarrier as of 2018, AFAIK. We achieved 34% editing.
Green: CRISPR-Cas9 ribonucleoprotein delivered via peptide nanocarriers
Blue: nucleus
Red: cytosol
Scale bar: 500 nanometers
Imaging: super-resolution microscopy
Using this sort of tech, you can target and manipulate specific cell types with arbitrary genetic code, both in permanent (e.g. CRISPR-Cas9) and temporary (e.g. mRNA) ways. T cell editing is particularly relevant in the fields of immuno-oncology and autoimmune diseases.
My ACE2 cloak hypothesis is shifting a bit. Soluble and membrane-bound ACE2 is clearly not fully saturating all exposed neutralizing antibody sites, and some B cells are binding. Still, ACE2 cloaking suggests that small numbers of virus get fully cloaked.
Alternatively to the ACE2 cloaking, the virus still has some shielding mechanisms alternative to that including glycosylation and going from closed to open conformations. In “open” state, ACE2 would bias the thermodynamics of B cell binding to the spike protein...
...and the subsequent antibody-generating response, to be preferential to other sites. Doesn’t mean that B cells won’t stick to neutralizing site at all.
This is in a large part driven by ACE2 existing both as a soluble and membrane-bound protein.