1/
"Herd immunity" is a sales campaign promoted by Pharma and friends.
An actual vaccine is suppose to provide significantly increased immunity to the vaccinated individual (ability to fight off new exposures to the pathogen).
PERIOD.
... /2
2/... "Herd immunity" is a theoretical concept in an ideal (unrealistic) model, virtually inapplicable to the real world where there are transfers of patents, lockdowns of care homes, centralized (hospital/clinic) testing and treatment, changing delivery and supply routes... /3
3/... In that fictitious ideal model, "herd immunity" is an immune-individual fraction of the population, for a given unchanging societal structure, sufficient to limit spread to contained pockets, rather than the entire population including every vulnerable person .../3
4/... If the "vaccine" does not prevent transmission by the vaccinated individual following infection and recovery of the vaccinated individual, then herd immunity is theoretically IMPOSSIBLE even in the ideal model. ...5
5/ ... This means: If they tell you that you must continue wearing a mask after your vaccination, then their advocating for "herd immunity" is a logical absurdity, even in their unrealistic ideal-model world. DAMN. ... /6
6/... Basically, virtually everyone except some already on the edge of death recovers from viral respiratory diseases, and stop transmitting it, with or without vaccines. The theoretical net benefit of vaccines for these pathogens is a dubious proposition.
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
1/n ResearchGate today has permanently locked my account, which I have had since 2015.
Their reasons graphically show the nature of their attack against democracy, and their corruption of science.
1/n Dr. Mike Yeadon is a brilliant and principled man. He explains that there is no scientific basis whatsoever for booster shots (2 or more injections), yet double-injections can be used to induce apparently natural mortality.
2/n Dr. Yeadon believes that it is therefore not unreasonable to conclude that power may be introducing the cover for a weapon of targeted mass depopulation, to be used when it wants, under the guise of a vaccination program.
3/n Do the Pentagon's best bioweapons that simulate natural causes (such as cancer, delayed heart failure) require sequential injections? Are they introducing the rollout protocol for deployment? Just my science-fiction thoughts.
1/n COVID is part of a geopolitical war in which, for now, the Western professional class does not suffer economic consequences.
2/n COVID is an integral part of the USA trade, economic, and naval blockade attack against China's natural development and economic ties in Asia, Africa and Latin America.
3/n As such, COVID (vaccines, lockdowns at will, total tracing surveillance, limited travel, depressed economy) will not end for at least a decade, and will only end to the degree that China can circumvent the aggression, or as long as we let them.