1/? a thread in hopes of speaking for a group of ppl (unrepresented in corporate media) who choose not to covid vaxx and therefore oppose all vaxx mandates:
2/? it's possible to see the data available, & even believe the data showing that covid infection poses a higher risk than a vaxx, & still choose not to vaxx. for some, esp young-ish healthy folks, we prefer organic likely risk over synthetic definite risk, scale notwithstanding.
3/? on top of this, the reality is that both the vaxx & pathogen will have unique side-effects for each person that we'll never be able to notice/prove. it's unique for each person so correlation/trends can't be established, & consequently these side-effects will go undiscovered.
4/? it is well known that we all have genes that predispose us to developing certain illnesses & it is well known that certain things can 'trigger' that genetically likely illness, or it can remain untriggered and cause no problem.
5/? both the vaxx & pathogen could be triggers for any number of things, & and we'll never know & never be able to truly compare overall risk to overall risk. so we are limited to comparing only KNOWN risks to KNOWN risks.
6/? so when you are young-ish & healthy, & based on the data available your risk is extremely low in both cases, it is not insane or selfish to choose aforementioned 'organic likely risk' over 'definite synthetic risk' when throwing in the variable of unknown risks on both sides.
7/? despite healthy skepticism around data regarding the vaxx & the pathogen, not everyone that chooses to pass on it is stupid or uncritical in their thinking, and it is sad that vaxx hesitancy has been stigmatized by politicians & the corporate media.
8/? we will always be limited to only KNOWN risks in our assessments of medicine & pathogens and that simple truth should guide our policy. we are not dealing in absolutes & medicinal intervention must always be a choice, and no one should be shamed for declining to participate.
@cariboumarkt@GovInslee 1/? did you even wonder why restaurants and agriculture were number 1&2 in cases? clearly not. because you only listen to the ‘news’ as opposed to following it with some critical thinking. both industries employ high numbers of immigrants living in small, crowded households.
@cariboumarkt@GovInslee 2/? on top of that, restaurants employ a young sample, they are tight knit and they’ve been socially gathering in each other’s homes this whole year. the spread is there and not a result of indoor dining.
@cariboumarkt@GovInslee 3/? the ‘studies’ of indoor dining spread amounted to surveys asking covid positives if they’d dined indoors at restaurants in the last 14 days. the other ‘studies’ used credit card data to show correlation of indoor dining and covid cases.
@naomirwolf pcr ‘testing’ issues finally hitting mainstream. it only took a year. here’s the main issue with pcr and ‘testing’ healthy ppl.
a thread...
@naomirwolf 2/ when you get a strep test, it is a culture test. if the live virus is there in any substantive way, it will grow in the lab after your swab. with pcr, they are just searching for strands at insanely high magnification.
@naomirwolf 3/ even the inventor of the pcr test, kary mullis, loathed the use of pcr as a ‘test.’ you can most always find endemic virus that you are looking for, dead nucleotides or alive, contagious or not.