The CIA Used To Infiltrate The Media. Now The CIA Is The Media.

"This isn't Operation Mockingbird. It's so much worse. Operation Mockingbird was the CIA doing something *to* the media. What we are seeing now is the CIA openly acting *as* the media."
caitlinjohnstone.substack.com/p/the-cia-used…
Back in our younger more innocent days the psychopathic CIA had to covertly infiltrate the news media to manipulate the information Americans were consuming about their nation and the world. Nowadays, there is no meaningful separation between the news media and the CIA at all.
Greenwald recently highlighted an interesting point about New York Times' reporting on the so-called "Bountygate" story the outlet broke last year about the Russian government trying to pay Taliban-linked fighters to attack US soldiers in Afghanistan:
This would be the same "Russian bounties" narrative which was discredited all the way back in September when the top US military official in Afghanistan said no satisfactory evidence had surfaced for the allegations.
nbcnews.com/politics/natio…
This would also be the same "Russian bounties" story that has just been further discredited with a new article by The Daily Beast titled "U.S. Intel Walks Back Claim Russians Put Bounties on American Troops".
The Daily Beast, which has itself uncritically published many articles promoting the CIA "Bountygate" narrative (), reports the following:
So the mass media aggressively promoted a CIA narrative that none of them ever saw proof of, because there was no proof, because it was an entirely unfounded claim from the very beginning. They quite literally ran a CIA press release and disguised it as a news story.
This allowed the CIA to throw shade and inertia on Trump's proposed troop withdrawals from Afghanistan and Germany, and to continue ramping up anti-Russia sentiments on the world stage,
theintercept.com/2020/07/02/hou…
It also may well have contributed to the fact that the CIA will officially be among those who are exempt from Biden's performative Afghanistan "withdrawal".
archive.is/UO3w8#selectio…
In totalitarian countries the government spy agency tells the news media what stories to run, and the news media unquestioningly publish it. In free democracies, the government spy agency says "Hoo buddy, have I got a scoop for you!" and the news media unquestioningly publish it.
In 1977 Carl Bernstein published an article titled "The CIA and the Media" on how the CIA had covertly infiltrated America's most influential news outlets and had over 400 reporters whom it considered assets in a program known as Operation Mockingbird.
carlbernstein.com/magazine_cia_a…
It was a major scandal, and rightly so. The news media is meant to report truthfully about what happens in the world, not manipulate public perception to suit the agendas of spooks and warmongers.
Nowadays the CIA collaboration happens right out in the open, and people are too propagandized to even recognize this as scandalous. Highly influential outlets like @nytimes uncritically pass on CIA disinfo which is then spun as fact by cable news pundits.
The sole owner of The Washington Post is a CIA contractor, and WaPo has never once disclosed this conflict of interest when reporting on US intelligence agencies per standard journalistic protocol.
huffpost.com/entry/why-amaz…
Mass media outlets now openly employ intelligence agency veterans like these folks:
The mass media also employ known CIA assets like @KenDilanianNBC.
theintercept.com/2014/09/04/for…
As well as CIA applicants like Tucker Carlson.
theweek.com/speedreads/689…
This isn't Operation Mockingbird. It's so much worse. Operation Mockingbird was the CIA doing something TO the media. What we are seeing now is the CIA openly acting AS the media. Any separation between the CIA and the news media, indeed even any pretence of separation, is gone.
And the CIA is the very worst institution that could possibly be spearheading the movements of that power structure. A little research into the many, many horrific things the CIA has done over the years will quickly show you that this is true.
whatwhenwhy.net/worst-intellig…
Hell, just a glance at what the CIA was up to with the Phoenix Program in Vietnam will show you this.
en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Phoenix_P…
One of the weirdest mainstream political beliefs is that secretive government agencies who did evil things in the past just don't do evil things anymore. This belief is based on literally nothing. Nothing whatsoever. It's believed because it's comfortable.
The CIA should not exist at all, let alone control the news media, much less the movements of the US empire.

• • •

Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to force a refresh
 

Keep Current with Caitlin Johnstone ⏳

Caitlin Johnstone ⏳ Profile picture

Stay in touch and get notified when new unrolls are available from this author!

Read all threads

This Thread may be Removed Anytime!

PDF

Twitter may remove this content at anytime! Save it as PDF for later use!

Try unrolling a thread yourself!

how to unroll video
  1. Follow @ThreadReaderApp to mention us!

  2. From a Twitter thread mention us with a keyword "unroll"
@threadreaderapp unroll

Practice here first or read more on our help page!

More from @caitoz

16 Apr
Defending the most powerful is always the wrong position. Defending cops from the people. The rich from the poor. The US empire from weaker powers. White people from POC. Men from women. Israel from Palestinians. You're just helping to create a more unjust and imbalanced world.
Most people intuitively grasp this, which is why a lot of effort by the powerful goes into making the up-power party look like the down-power party. But that just proves that power knows it can make itself more powerful by getting more people to defend and side with it.
You'll see such distortion in attempts to spin the leaders of empire-targeted governments as the up-power party just because they're the dominant power within their own nation, even though they've got the might of the entire US-centralized power alliance stacked against them.
Read 7 tweets
16 Apr
Who cares if there are extraterrestrials? If there are we're nowhere near mature enough as a species to interact with them anyway. Hell, we have giant-brained leviathans swimming in our own oceans whose mental lives we don't understand at all, and we've nearly killed them off.
Some people hope the ETs will save us from the conditions we've created for ourselves. No they won't. If there are ETs and they have noticed us they're certainly not going to give a psychotic omnicidal species powerful energy technologies. There will be no ET ex machina ending.
Our species is like a guy with a completely fucked up personal life who keeps chasing goals and accomplishments outside of himself thinking it will make him happy. We need to stop looking up to the stars and focus on our severe issues right here. We're on our own for this one.
Read 6 tweets
15 Apr
I don't write much about the individuals driving the oligarchic empire because individuals are not the problem, the system is. Right-wing conspiracy analysts prefer to focus on specific corrupt elites because they like to think if you just got rid of them, capitalism would work.
And it just wouldn't. If you rounded up and executed all the sociopathic ruling elites today but left our current systems intact they'd just be replaced tomorrow. A competition-based model where war, corruption, oppression and exploitation remain profitable guarantees this.
A lot of right-wing conspiracy analysis today ultimately boils down to "These bastards are ruining the capitalism!" But capitalism is already ruined, and ruinous. As long as it's profitable to destroy each other and our ecosystem, the ruin will continue. That is the real problem.
Read 8 tweets
14 Apr
Intelligence Sources Say Biggest Threat To U.S. Is Actually U.S. Policy

"A new 'threat assessment' by the US intelligence cartel has named China the number one threat facing the United States today, followed by Russia, Iran, and North Korea."
caitlinjohnstone.substack.com/p/intelligence…
This has of course led to blaring news headlines like this one from The New York Times, instead of something a little less propagandistic like "Here's who the CIA wants you to be afraid of in order to advance its geostrategic power agendas."
The report makes a bunch of evidence-free assertions which serve no purpose other than to help manufacture consent for the movement of expensive weaponry around the globe at the facilitation of unscrupulous war propaganda firms like The New York Times.
fair.org/home/nyt-lamen…
Read 12 tweets
13 Apr
Meditations On US Forces Firing A Howitzer Into The Empty Desert "Just To Say We're Here"

"U.S. forces firing a 155-millimetre howitzer twice a week into the surrounding desert, at no specific target, 'just to say we’re here,' one officer told me."
caitlinjohnstone.substack.com/p/meditations-…
I saw a line in a recent New Yorker article about America's endless wars, and it's been been rattling around in my head ever since: Image
Tell me that's not the sexiest line you have ever read in your entire life. The poetical beauty! The ennui! The oh-so-relatable existential ache! Oh God, I need a cigarette. Image
Read 10 tweets
11 Apr
Remember the time the Daily Mail ran an Assange smear featuring a photo of a clean bathroom and a dish he was actively using titled "ASSANGE INSIDE HIS FETID LAIR: REVEALED, THE FULL SQUALID HORROR THAT DROVE THE EMBASSY STAFF TO FINALLY KICK HIM OUT"?
dailymail.co.uk/news/article-6…
It just shows so much about the power of narrative. They took a picture of a COMPLETELY CLEAN BATHROOM and a plate he was LITERALLY PRESENTLY EATING OFF OF, and because they captioned it with "SQUALID HORROR" and "FETID LAIR" people actually believed it showed evidence of that.
Just click this link and scroll through all the people sharing the Daily Mail article on Twitter as though it shows evidence of Assange being a bad houseguest at the embassy:
twitter.com/search?q=https…
Read 6 tweets

Did Thread Reader help you today?

Support us! We are indie developers!


This site is made by just two indie developers on a laptop doing marketing, support and development! Read more about the story.

Become a Premium Member ($3/month or $30/year) and get exclusive features!

Become Premium

Too expensive? Make a small donation by buying us coffee ($5) or help with server cost ($10)

Donate via Paypal Become our Patreon

Thank you for your support!

Follow Us on Twitter!