/2 If you let yourself, these are the days when you learn the most about markets, trading, and your own weaknesses.
A lot was lacking in my approach to this trade. I had not considered the different scenarios that could play out, and thus had no plan to meet them.
/3 I traded from reflex, not thought. And I did so from the short side, which compounded these errors.
Maybe I won't end up being the ultimate fish when the dust settles. I expect my short will end up profitable in the next week. Retail will, as usual, get stuck with the bag.
/4 You run into players who are truly exceptional. This was the case today with the individual who ran the Doge campaign. They remind me of the spoofer on Bitmex from years ago in terms of trading acumen.
- mark up (multiple times when this player bought into his own walls) while baiting shorts
- exit inventory into liquidations on derivatives (note the heavily negative funding, $760MM in derivatives liquidations)
/7 So in the end, was it worth it? Lessons are inevitable. So is paying your tuition in the market, even if you happen to be an old hand. But I learned a couple things today, and will remember the artful performance of whoever ran Doge today far longer than the money lost.
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
/1 I think it time for me to acknowledge that I was grossly off in a lot of my criticism of NFTs.
I owe thanks to those forward-thinking individuals whose exploration of this new creative medium changed my mind.
/2 However, a caveat - I continue in thinking that buying almost any NFT tradeable today will result in a net loss in 1 years' time and further.
/3 I have purchased a few NFTs myself and had a great time in doing so. I think part of my myopia stemmed from framing NFTs solely from the perspective of a trader. There are many other lens through which NFTs become much more persuasive.
/1 on the advantages of replacing high leverage margin swap/futures positions with options
/2 have heard anecdotes of participants losing large parts of their crypto holdings by chasing the bull market with mistimed leveraged longs and see thousands of nameless participants in the billions in notional that are liquidated on any material move in the markets.
/3 there are two enormous costs to engaging in this behavior:
1) poor traders tend to chase, margin longing after significant price moves up have already happened. combined with high leverage, this means they manage to lose money by being liquidated (force sold) on pullbacks.
An alt has the veneer of scarcity within its own system. But that mirage evaporates when it is viewed outside its border.
If an alt then lacks scarcity outside of its own confines, its only value stems from two sources: its use case as a speculative vehicle and the minimum amount necessary to be held at any one time to achieve its demanded utilization.
Remember this chart if anyone dares tell you there is scarcity in alts; ~7,500 alts are listed on CMC alone (more than 2x the count from 1 year ago), with 2x+ that number unlisted and floating in the ether.
One alt threatens the scarcity of BTC. Many alts only ossify it.
/1 The first difficulty adjustment post-halving is indicative of an ~15% hash power ratchet down.
/2 This is somewhat in line with the model mix assumed by @BlockwareTeam's report in March (blockwaresolutions.com/research-and-p…) where S9's were seen at 38.6%. That number probably trended down as miners positioned into the halving and upgraded equipment.
/3 A material difficulty adjustment downwards can be understood as a bloodletting of the weakest mining participants. Parri passau, these miners are obligated to sell the largest % of rewards to cover costs. Lower cost miners could also sell all inventory, but are not mandated.