and this is where the discourse has been stagnant for a few years now. first of all, this analysis is categorically insufficient/incorrect/anti-black.

but, this is where “privilege” & “intersectionality” (devoid of an ideology, as joy james talks about) discourse has led us, lol
you have people claiming (x) group has “privilege” & “benefits” from (x) structural oppression, and what happens is instead of interrogating the fact these colonial structures of power exist & how to eradicate them; you’re having endless insufficient debates about the semantics.
these liberal analyses of “privilege” have been trying to force people who are allegedly in-proximity to power to “acknowledge their privilege” and it has failed!

it has not challenged power, saved a life, fed any empty stomach’s—but the language is in everyone’s lexicon!
and yet, best believe there’s a multi-million dollar post-intersectionality economy with individuals getting rich telling you to “acknowledge your privilege!” and “how to be intersectional!” 😭 goodbyeeeeeeeeeeee
and i would argue most people in positions of “””privilege””” don’t actually materially benefit, in a way that’s easily recognizable, from said “””privilege”””—which is why the analysis is insufficient because people know if they “benefit,” then why isn’t it paying their rent?
why aren’t these “benefits” stopping them from being victimized by racialized state violence? or, incarceration? why isn’t it feeding their kids’ empty stomach? why are they still experiencing labor alienation and exploitation? etc. etc.
when the fact of the matter is, it really doesn’t matter if you do or don’t “benefit” from these colonial structures of power—b/c a lot of us are ideologically invested in it in one way or another—even if we don’t benefit, which is harming/killing ourselves and others.
so how do we ground ourselves in a politic where we are divesting from these, again, colonial/capitalist/imperialist/patriarchal systems of power? seems like such a far more fruitful way of approaching these struggles assuming your goal is actually liberation ofc. lol idk, tho.

• • •

Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to force a refresh
 

Keep Current with read ‘discourse on colonialism’ by aimé césaire!

read ‘discourse on colonialism’ by aimé césaire! Profile picture

Stay in touch and get notified when new unrolls are available from this author!

Read all threads

This Thread may be Removed Anytime!

PDF

Twitter may remove this content at anytime! Save it as PDF for later use!

Try unrolling a thread yourself!

how to unroll video
  1. Follow @ThreadReaderApp to mention us!

  2. From a Twitter thread mention us with a keyword "unroll"
@threadreaderapp unroll

Practice here first or read more on our help page!

More from @queersocialism

15 Apr
this narrative of ‘cops as workers’ would cease, if we had a marxian analysis of class &broke away from traditional modalities of bourgeois economics which classifies people on the basis of arbitrary income & material possessions as opposed to proximity to the means of production
a lot of cops—especially those in big cities—are making BANK. so even if we’re to use the whole income thing, a lot of them aren’t in the same economic strata as an average worker.
but, either way, cops serve the rule of capital & private property; they are agents of the ruling class, which inherently makes them enemy of workers. so here we can’t even just mention proximity to means of production, but also their class/political character, how do they serve?
Read 4 tweets
10 Apr
first, if we are to take cedric robinson’s work serious: there were examples of racial regimes prior to the slave trade as evident by europe’s antagonistic relationship with many, at the time seemingly “racialized” groups, who would later “become” white (irish/jews/etc).
even beyond that: race was created in europe & the contemporary racial order cannot merely be belittled to being an invented tool of the ruling class to prevent “solidarity.” race was politically mobilized to justify the dehumanization/trafficking/enslavement of black africans.
how can “race” be belittled to being a “tool to divide the working class”—when it is the foundation upon which capitalism was originally formed?
Read 7 tweets
10 Apr
“race was invented to keep working class people divided,” in discussions about the antagonisms between black/white people is reductionist, and i think it would be more fruitful to name ideological whiteness as said tool that does ultimately negates solidarity & community building
the incredibly vague rhetoric of “race [dividing] working class people” implies race and its inherent constant terror & violence, is a two-way street—when it is, in fact, something that has been overwhelmingly enacted on wc/poor black people by white people of every class strata
yet, this is where the loudest & most dominant sectors of marxist discourse (that privileges a universalized + reductionist analysis of proximity/relationship to capital), particularly in the US/west, has historically failed, on the question of (particularly anti-black) racism!
Read 6 tweets
9 Jan
i don’t think leftists who romanticize the fantasy of “radicalizing” fascists—whether they are poor or petite-bourgeois—understand they are often doing the very thing they hate about liberal representationists and how they treat/have co-opted & neoliberalized identity politics.
treating a marginalized positionality, identity—in this case “working class” standing—as inherently moral, good natured, and progressive. despite their ideological and political alignment representing that of a class traitor. is this not what liberal identity reductionists do?
i’m tweeting this because it’s something i’ve been thinking a lot, and feel i am just finding the words to articulate what i’m saying. but if i’m off base let me know.
Read 7 tweets
3 Dec 20
the concept of “pretty privilege” has always been so odd to me, and i wish we’d retire it from our lexicon. as if being desired by men—and the structures dominated by ‘em—is somehow liberatory, or puts one in further proximity to power instead of male terror, violence, and death
oh my god. this is not saying that “undesirables” don’t face violence. when i have seen “privilege privilege” used, it’s usually in the context of one being hypervisible/desired—& i’m saying: how can that be a privilege, if hypervisibility makes one more susceptible to violence?
my issue is the word “privilege” here, reducing structural and material realities to mere individual experiences and pejoratives.

i’ve seen people call it “pretty privilege” for women to get free drinks at a bar. 😭 and i’ve hated the term ever since...
Read 4 tweets
2 Dec 20
one of the most harmful—and most beneficial to the ruling elite—political myths, is that the pinnacle of political “success” and progress is putting more milquetoast democrats into office
there is no better depiction of democrats’ historical role as demobilizers of movements than them riding (and co-opting) the wave of m4bl to getting one of the most uninspired candidates in the contemporary era elected, than betraying said demands en masse once elected.
if anything, biden being branded by the professional misleadership class as the solution to police violence—amidst calls to defund the police via the largest, most sustained uprisings we’ve seen in decades—is what won him the election
Read 5 tweets

Did Thread Reader help you today?

Support us! We are indie developers!


This site is made by just two indie developers on a laptop doing marketing, support and development! Read more about the story.

Become a Premium Member ($3/month or $30/year) and get exclusive features!

Become Premium

Too expensive? Make a small donation by buying us coffee ($5) or help with server cost ($10)

Donate via Paypal Become our Patreon

Thank you for your support!

Follow Us on Twitter!