On January 6, Biggs tweeted that he would "lead the charge" and "fight" to overturn the election results. He also promised to "produce documents" during the debate with evidence of "fraud."
@Toyota@RepAndyBiggsAZ 7. @Toyota claims that it "decided against giving to some members who, through their statements and actions, undermine the legitimacy of our elections and institutions"
@Toyota@RepAndyBiggsAZ 8. Toyota also said it does "not believe it is appropriate to judge members of Congress solely based on their votes on election certification."
This language was taken word-for-word from a memo issued by the @USChamber in March
12. Several companies pledged to suspend donations to the 147 Republicans and then donated to multi-candidate committees that support the objectors like the @NRSC, @NRCC, and @hcfpac.
UPDATE: @pfizer pledged not to donate to any of the 147 Republican objectors for at least 6 months and then donated $2500 to @RepAdrianSmith, who voted against certification, on 3/17
Pfizer has ignored my inquires about the donation, but I've obtained an internal email w/answers
3. There is still the issue of the leadership PAC of @MikeKellyPA, one of the 147 Republican objectors, who reported receiving a 2.5K donation from @Pfizer on 2/11
1. Today is the most significant FEC deadline since the 1/6 insurrection.
We'll learn which corporations are keeping their promises and which are hoping people have stopped paying attention.
I'll be tracking the most significant filings in this thread.
Follow if interested.
2. @Toyota, which after 1/6 said it would be "assessing our future PAC criteria," donated $1,000 to @RepJeffDuncan, who voted to overturn the election results, on March 5.
3. This is the 6th member who voted to overturn the election that later received a donation from @Toyota:
3. As part of their sponsorship package, @thehill sold API and Phillip Morris the right to present a "sponsors perspective" during various presentations.
When we asked one participant about the sponsors role, she told us she had decided to drop out.
1. Hundreds of corporations have signed onto a new letter supporting "the right to vote" and opposing "discriminatory legislation" and I'm not impressed.
Here's why.
2. The statement does not address specific voter suppression bills that are under consideration in Texas, Arizona and elsewhere.
And the organizers of the letter made clear that there is no expectation that the signatories oppose any specific bills.
3. This is exactly what we saw in Georgia where a number of companies endorsed a broad statement in support of voting rights issued by the Metro Atlanta Chamber of Commerce but stayed silent on individual bills.
@JDVance1 2. J.D. Vance is going to run for the U.S. Senate.
In preparation for that his friend and business partner, billionaire corporate executive Peter Theil, has donated $10 MILLION, to a Super PAC that supports his candidacy
3. Theil is the chairman of Palantir, on the board of Facebook, and runs a hedge fund.
Backed by this mountain of corporate cash, Vance has the audacity to present himself as someone who is prepared to take on the elite and corporate power
1. Corporations received a lot of positive press for holding a Zoom call discussing the possibility of action in support of voting rights but there is no time to waste.
Texas could approve new voter suppression bills any day.
2. Corporate America failed to act with focus and urgency in Georgia and many companies issued statements opposing new restrictions AFTER the bill was signed into law.