THREAD:
So you're running the U.S. economy.
Q: How big should the U.S. budget deficit be?
A: Bigger than the trade deficit, to avoid crises.
Not expecting that answer? Wondering why? Learn about one of the coolest economic concepts, the sector balances. 1/ Image
There are 3 sectors described by CBO:
1. Govt: The federal budget balance.
2. Foreign: The current account, roughly equal to the trade balance plus some investment-related $ flows.
3. Private: Household savings minus business investment. 2/
cbo.gov/publication/54…
Government sector: CBO uses the federal budget deficit as its measure. In 2020, the U.S. ran a 15% GDP budget deficit; it had been 2.4% in 2014 (about historical average) and increased to 4.6% in 2019. 3/ Image
The foreign sector is the U.S. current account balance (mostly trade plus some investment flows) multiplied by -1, as we view it from the foreigners' perspective. A U.S. trade or current account deficit is a foreign surplus. It has been about 3% GDP for a decade. 4/ Image
The third sector is the private sector, saving minus investment.* It was in deficit from 2002 to 2008, then reversed dramatically in the Great Recession.

*CBO includes state & local government budget balances here, as they use federal budget as government to simplify. 5/ Image
Putting them all into one graph, we see the first graph in the thread again. Note that the 3 balances in 2020 add to zero, as they do each and every year. This is a mathematical identity (equation that must hold true) based on how the sectors are defined. 6/ Image
Yes, you read that correctly. The sum is always zero. Here is the data table used to create the chart, and a handy FRED link for the chart and data. 7/
tps://fred.stlouisfed.org/graph/?graph_id=549449 Image
Looking at the equations in the table in graphic form, you basically have the federal government spending $ into the private sector and removing $ via taxation. You don't want the private sector in deficit (i.e., accumulating debt) for very long; bad things happen... 8/ Image
...like the GR in 2008. Private sector ran sizable deficits in the decade prior, borrowing via foreign surplus and was forced to stop borrowing suddenly and deleverage. Note this drove the government deficit up to maintain the identity. 9/
levyinstitute.org/publications/s… Image
Trump's goal of lowering the trade deficit and increasing the budget deficit via tax cuts were not compatible. If the red line moves farther from zero, the sum of the blue and green lines must shift up; people spend extra money injected by government on imports too. 10/ Image
Here is a quiz you can use to see if you got it; solutions on next tweet. 11/ Image
Quiz solutions: 12/ Image
So why should the U.S. run a budget deficit larger than the trade deficit (foreign surplus)? Because that's what it takes to have a private sector surplus. You want government steadily injecting money into the private sector, at a level that doesn't create inflation. 13/ Image
If the U.S. takes its trade deficit (~foreign surplus) of 3% GDP as a given, then the budget deficit has to be at least 3% GDP so private sector in surplus. That's the floor. The goal is not a budget surplus.

14/THE END.
Fixed: The link to the CBO method sector balances.
fred.stlouisfed.org/graph/?graph_i…

• • •

Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to force a refresh
 

Keep Current with David Doney

David Doney Profile picture

Stay in touch and get notified when new unrolls are available from this author!

Read all threads

This Thread may be Removed Anytime!

PDF

Twitter may remove this content at anytime! Save it as PDF for later use!

Try unrolling a thread yourself!

how to unroll video
  1. Follow @ThreadReaderApp to mention us!

  2. From a Twitter thread mention us with a keyword "unroll"
@threadreaderapp unroll

Practice here first or read more on our help page!

More from @David_Charts

18 Jul 20
Since Trump will be lying a lot about his economic record, here are 6 slides to have ready for debating your conservative friends. I'll start with a comparison against the last 7 Presidents on perhaps the most important variable, job creation, where Trump is in last place. 1/
The stock market was up more at this point in Obama's presidency than Trump's, about +70% vs. +40%. As recently as March, Trump was actually at 0%. 2/
Trump's pre-Coronavirus economic record in his first 3 years (2017-2019) compares unfavorably to the last 3 years of Obama (2014-2016) on job creation, budget deficits, the uninsured, and real (after-inflation) wage growth. The unemployment rate had been falling since 2010. 3/
Read 6 tweets
24 May 20
The economy performs far better under Democratic Presidents. This thread gives you some links and charts for arguing about it with your conservative friends. Let's start with a summary article from The Economist. 1/
economist.com/united-states/…
The stock market performs better under Democratic Presidents. 2/

money.cnn.com/2015/10/28/inv…
Private sector job growth has been about 2.5% per year under Democratic Presidents vs. 1.0% under Republicans. 3/
jec.senate.gov/public/index.c…
Read 9 tweets

Did Thread Reader help you today?

Support us! We are indie developers!


This site is made by just two indie developers on a laptop doing marketing, support and development! Read more about the story.

Become a Premium Member ($3/month or $30/year) and get exclusive features!

Become Premium

Too expensive? Make a small donation by buying us coffee ($5) or help with server cost ($10)

Donate via Paypal Become our Patreon

Thank you for your support!

Follow Us on Twitter!

:(