I have seen several persons stating that the Army needs a definition of extremism and that it is wasting Soldiers’ time until it makes one. Maybe they are not familiar with AR 600-20 4-12 a. (1)-(9)
a. Participation. Military personnel must reject participation in extremist organizations and activities. Extremist organizations and activities are ones that advocate—
(1) Racial, sex (including gender identity), sexual orientation, or ethnic hatred or intolerance.
(2) Creating or engaging in discrimination based on race, color, sex (including gender identity), national origin, religion, or sexual orientation.
(3) The use of force or violence or unlawful means to deprive individuals of their rights under the United States Constitution or the laws of the United States, or any State.
(4) Support for terrorist organizations or objectives.
(5) The use of unlawful violence or force to achieve goals that are political, religious, discriminatory, or ideological in nature.
(6) Expressing a duty to engage in violence against DoD or the United States in support of a terrorist or extremist cause.
(7) Support for persons or organizations that promote or threaten the unlawful use of force or violence or criminal activity.
(8) Encouraging military or civilian personnel to violate laws or disobey lawful orders or regulations for the purpose of disrupting military activities (subversion).
(9) Participating in activities advocating or teaching the overthrow of the U.S. Government by force or violence, or seeking to alter the form of government by unconstitutional means (sedition).
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
“Seeing men as the default human is fundamental to the structure of human society.”
‘What? No. Really?’ The first line, and already my bias was showing. A common occurrence through the meticulously presented data of how at every turn, half the world’s population is let down.
It is no wonder that “Women will buy books by and about men, but men won’t buy books by and about women (or at least not many.)” I noted that my reading list just form this year is skewed to male authors. (3 to 12)
I had the joy of attending a virtual LPD by Chris and pick up his book to dive into his cyborg thoughts a bit more.
The part one quote from the Nintendo quite screen assured me I was going to enjoy it.
I could never collect or analyze or process the amount of self-data that Chris has, but his structured development from his data to information to knowledge to wisdom was consistent with my KM proclivities.