This morning we will hear closing arguments in the Derek Chauvin trial. Our coverage begins at 8:30 on @kare11. Closings start at 9 with Steve Schleicher delivering for the state, followed by Eric Nelson for the defense, then Jerry Blackwell with rebuttal for the state.
Judge Cahill is currently reading jury instructions. Very important -- as they including the elements of each crime that has to be proven. In closing arguments, the attorneys will then specifically refer back to them.
Here is our live stream:
Eric Nelson has made the strategic choice of going all-in, 100% on the "reasonable police officer" standard in his closing argument.
Rather than focusing on cause of death.
Much longer closing arguments than I've personally watched before.
In the Noor case, defense took 90 min. Prosecution about an hour.
Judge Cahill just said "I've give you that Congresswoman (Maxine) Waters may have given you something on appeal, that may result in this whole trial could be overturned."
Judge Cahill is downloading on Congresswoman Waters now...
"Abhorrent. But hasn't prejudiced us" to a mistrial.
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
Derek Chauvin is GUILTY OF ALL THREE COUNTS in the death of George Floyd.
2nd Degree Murder: GUILTY
3rd Degree Murder: GUILTY
2nd Degree Manslaughter: GUILTY #ChauvinTrial#GeorgeFloyd
Chauvin is convicted across the board.
Judge thanks the jury not just for jury service, but for "heavy duty jury service."
Good morning. We are on verdict-watch in the Derek Chauvin trial. The jury deliberated last night for about 4 hours, from 4p-8p. And they resumed this morning at 8a.
What should we watch for? Besides coming forward with a verdict, at some point they might have a question.
If the jury has a question in this case -- the judge will call the parties back into court and will read the jury's question out loud - and on camera.
The judge will then answer the jury's question on the record (although he will have already discussed his answer with attorneys)
Questions can be somewhat mundane -- like asking to be refreshed on what someone testified about -- or a question about the exhibits. Here is an example jury question from the Yanez trial in 2017.
Here's a quick little explanation of Minnesota's sentencing guidelines, which can help Minnesotans and out-of-staters alike understand what Derek Chauvin would face if found guilty -- as well as understanding the charge Kim Potter now faces. First, this is the grid.
On the grid you can see example crimes in the first column ranked by "severity level" in the second column. At this link you can find more example offenses and their corresponding severity levels. I snipped severity level 8 to highlight Manslaughter-2. mn.gov/msgc-stat/docu…
"Manslaughter 2nd Degree – Culpable Negligence" is one of Chauvin's charges as well as the charge filed against Potter.
The top row of the grid is labeled "criminal history score." If someone has prior convictions, there is a calculation used. But Chauvin & Potter are both 0.
We are heading into court for the Derek Chauvin trial at 8:45a. There are some motions to handle before the jury is brought in, including some finality to witness Morries Hall. We expect testimony from Chauvin's medical experts after that. kare11.com/article/news/l…
Here is the morning live stream:
The first issue is defense attorney Eric Nelson’s judgment for acquittal, a normal motion that happens in trials after the prosecution finishes its case. “The state has failed to provide sufficient evidence, even in the light most favorable to the state," Nelson says.