The more you think about the European Super League format, the more ridiculous it is.
#SuperLeague offers 5 qualifying places (let's be honest, they're guest slots).
The 5 teams will be part of UEFA. The 5 would have to reject the UCL to take part for 1 season. Laughable.
Not forgetting, of course, they only have 12 teams and failed to get Bayern, Dortmund and PSG on board.
They couldn't get to 15 they need to start this!
Is anyone going to join them after the reaction?
Who are they going to fill it with? Shakhtar? Zenit? BATE Borisov?
It makes sense that the big 6 in England, and 3 in Spain and Italy, all signed up. Clearly for some the FOMO on the financials to domestic rivals is very difficult to reject.
But it's against the ethos of Bayern and Dortmund, and PSG were the only French club invited. (cont)
Bayern, Dortmund and PSG know that they will not be hit competitively against the Dirty Dozen - because those 12 will no longer play in the same competition.
The Dirty Dozen are blinded by sticking their snouts in the trough, desperately not wanting to miss out.
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
So the Premier League 14 meet today to discuss the Six Saboteurs and the European #SuperLeague.
What happens is going to be really important.
The Premier League needs the Six Saboteurs.
The Six Saboteurs need the Premier League.
The ESL would break the Premier League. 1/9
It's reported that as part of the JP Morgan financing package, clubs must continue playing domestic football.
So the Six Saboteurs will fight tooth and nail through all avenues to make sure they are not banned. 2/9
Gianni Infantino at the UEFA Congress on the ESL clubs:
"If some elect to go their own way then they must live with the consequences of their choice, they are responsible for their choice - concretely this means, either you are in, or you are out." 3/9
Most for: Brighton 9
Fewest for: Arsenal 2
Most against: Liverpool 12
Fewest against: Burnley 0
Most net for: Burnley 5
Most net against: Liverpool, WBA 6
Most involvement: Liverpool 18
VAR STATS (cont)
Most goals awarded: Leicester 4
Most goals disallowed: Liverpool 7
Best net goal score: Sheffield United +3
Worst net goal score: Liverpool -8
There was no angle for the VAR to make a decision with the tech there. Mbaye Diagne's shoulder blocked on two angles, and the defender's boot on the other. Impossible for the VAR to over-rule, would be a guess. #WBASOU
So no doubt we are going to have another massive controversy here.
How can the VAR make a decision here when you cannot see the player who scored the goal? It would be a guess.
This is the correct decision. VAR cannot over-rule the linesman when he cannot see the two player.
It is completely impossible to make a VAR decision off this.
You cannot see where Mbaye Diagne's upper body is.
For that reason, the ONLY decision is to stay with the field decision.
- Spurs v Man United
- Burnley v Newcastle
- Why we're in this situation
- Comparison to Bundesliga / other leagues
- Brief offside (it's nothing new)
There's many moving parts to this. Strap in!
Let's start with the big decisions.
Firstly, the Scott McTominay foul on Son Heung-Min.
This is very much along the same lines as the penalty Danny Welbeck was awarded against Liverpool. If the ref gives the foul, fine. But it's not for VAR in the PL.
In both, the decisions don't happen if the VAR doesn't get involved. If the VAR does, and based upon the replays, the ref is left with little option at the monitor.
The surprise is the VAR was Craig Pawson, who hasn't advised a goal be disallowed all season - even for offside.
Leagues MUST be allowed to follow the UCL method and only give offside when technology graphically provides a clear decision.
Pierluigi Collina wants it this way. It has to happen. #FULWOL
One subjective aspect people don't appreciate is one VAR can look this and decide the tech isn't needed and give the goal.
But tonight (like with Bamford vs. Palace) the VAR decided to get the tech out. Once he does that, it opens it up to these pathetic millimetre decisions.
Decisions such as these are NOT about the offside law. People get wrapped up in that.
It's not the problem. It's not about feet. It's not about daylight.
The issue is how offside is handled in VAR. How the major leagues have been told to use the tech to the absolute letter.