Most common, angry response, in effect: “the world changed in 1964, and now Dems are righteous on race.”
This is nonsense, on many levels.
(1) GOP, the party of Lincoln, was founded to END slavery. Dems ferociously defended slavery.
3/x (2) In 1964, 82% of GOP voted for Civil Rights Act. Only 69% of Dems did & Dems filibustered to try to kill it.
(3) It’s not just ancient Dem history (which Lefties angrily insist). The CURRENT Dem governor of VA displayed a Klansman in his yearbook.
4/x (4) Dem Robert Byrd, the Senate Majority Leader from 1987-89, was an “Exalted Cyclops” in the KKK.
(5) Joe Biden gave a gushing eulogy for Klansman Byrd ELEVEN YEAR AGO.
5/x (6) Dems today ferociously oppose school choice—the most important civil rights issue in America.
(7) Dems today routinely try the divide & inflame racial tensions (see, eg, Maxine Waters urging riots; Biden “they’re going to put you back in chains.”)
6/x (8) Just last month, EVERY SINGLE DEMOCRAT voted for a new program that explicitly discriminates based on race, forgiving Ag loans for farmers only in specified races. This is wrong & only divides us further.
7/x (9) Two months ago, Biden admin dismissed the prosecution of Yale for explicitly discriminating against Asian-Americans. When it suits their political advantage, TODAY’s Dems enthusiastically support racial discrimination.
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
The White House hand-picked a TV crew to accompany their trip to the Carrizo Springs, NOT the Donna facility.
That’s not transparency.
True transparency would be to open the Donna facility to press that’s at 1,556% capacity when 18 Senators go there Friday.
Reports about the CBP's Donna facility indicate minors are hungry, have only showered once in 7 days, were forced to sleep on the floor, and haven't seen sunlight in days.
Of course the Biden admin isn't allowing cameras in that facility.
The Biden admin is instead taking a camera to HHS's Carrizo Springs facility which The Washington Post reports has a soccer field, basketball court, and "a legal services trailer has the Spanish word 'Bienvenidos,' or welcome, on a banner on its roof."
Yet another example of biased, dishonest “fact-checking.”
Newsweek admits “Individuals who overstay their visas but pay tax in the United States using a Social Security number may be eligible for stimulus payments.”
They also admit 676k visa overstays in a single year.
They ignore that those accumulate over decades, and 60% of the 12m total illegal aliens are visa overstays.
So, they conclude EVERY WORD THAT I SAID IS TRUE (and Dick Durbin’s claims to the contrary are false), but they’re left-wing propagandists, so they still call it “mostly false”!
2/x You claim “no illegal immigrants will get checks.”
Q1: Dick, true or false: 60% of illegal aliens are visa overstays.
Q2: True or false: Migrants who come to US legally on a work visa are allowed to have a SSN, yet when they overstay their visa they become illegal aliens.
3/x Q3: Dick, true or false: under the Dem bill, millions of illegal immigrants (w/ SSNs) will receive $1400 checks.
Q4: If that’s not true (you bellowed that it was “a lie!”), why did the nonpartisan Joint Committee on Taxation determine my amendment would save taxpayers $675m?
Want to understand why we’re so divided? Why each side seems to live in alternate universes? Take a moment & examine the misinformation here (both deliberate & inadvertent).
FACT 1: Dem spending bill sends $1400 to each adult in US.
Dems had agreed to know witnesses, then House Managers changed their mind this morning.
Schumer blindsided. Pandemonium. They’re negotiating now to figure out next steps.
2/x While we’re waiting to figure out what’s next, I thought I’d share some of the Qs in the pile that DIDN’T make the cut to be asked yesterday. (These are all real, from various senators, who will remain anonymous.)