Their right about one thing...we do need a debate reset.
End to end encryption provides some safety, but it doesn't go far enough.
For decades our tools have failed to combat bulk metadata surveillance, it's time to push forward and support radical privacy initiatives.
End to end encryption provides some safety, but it doesn't go far enough.
For decades our tools have failed to combat bulk metadata surveillance, it's time to push forward and support radical privacy initiatives.
https://twitter.com/_andyburrows/status/1384069539327922182
As an aside, I love the way that the NSPCC tell on themselves in this ridiculous report by contrasting the rights of children with the rights of "LGBTQ+ young people"
Refusing to even acknowledge the intersectionality of their own client base if a great way to provide "balance".
Refusing to even acknowledge the intersectionality of their own client base if a great way to provide "balance".
Anyway we do this dance every 6 weeks or so now, and I'm busy building actual privacy tools so I will let past-Sarah explain why all of this is bullshit.
https://twitter.com/SarahJamieLewis/status/1325876494564913153
It's been like 4 years since I published Queer Privacy and the conversations are the same then as they are now.
https://twitter.com/SarahJamieLewis/status/1178915251963645953
Privacy isn't something you legislate and it isn't something you are given.
Privacy is something you take and something you defend.
Privacy is something you take and something you defend.
https://twitter.com/SarahJamieLewis/status/1178870411955589121
"Deliberately perforating our critical (social) infrastructure under the assumption that it will only be exploited by the good guys is negligence and should not be tolerated"
https://twitter.com/SarahJamieLewis/status/1060567850224574465
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
