THREAD On the latest announcement on vaccines - 1. A disastrous course that will deter adoption, increase hesitancy and drive prices out of the reach of beleaguered states and people who need it most. All in the name of being market friendly
2. Did you notice the main ploy in the Phase 3 is that half the supplies will be based on market prices, delivered to state governments? The Centre will get the other half of the supplies at the fixed rate contract, leaving the other half for private profit gouging.
3. This will significantly depress vaccine adoption, especially among the high-risk groups. This also worsens India's vaccine problem by adding another dimension.
4. This is probably what Piyush Goyal meant by "managing demand" - use the market-based price to drive demand lower. Voila! You dont have a vaccine shortage any more! How smart!
5. So, opening the drive to 18+ population, a good move in itself, will likely be derailed by the liberalised pricing power handed over to companies. But wait, the price shock may well hit uptake even among this section. The "good" decision will thus be whacked by higher prices.
6. Meanwhile, state governments, which have already done the bulk of the heavy lifting in the pandemic, will be burdened with the higher prices for vaccines they will have to source from the “open” market.
7. Effectively, the latest vaccine policy is a cynical attempt by the desperate NaMo Govt to find an escape route from accountability in a national health emergency. This is ensured that it will only have to vaccinate 300 million from its kitty.
8. This would leave the bulk of the population at the mercy of the market. In effect, the NaMo Govt has applied a “market-based” solution to a public health crisis. In choosing this approach India stands alone in the comity of nations using a vaccine to fighting the pandemic.END
THREAD - On the dangerous Indian free market approach to vaccination 1. This is about the wishful fantasies of free market warriors about vaccines, who welcome SSI’s decision on a three-tier price structure - 150/dose for Centre, 400 for states and 600 for pet hospitals.
2. First and foremost, this is by no means a “free market” for vaccines. There is heavy intervention by way at every stage, including in development of the vaccine, its distribution and lastly in terms of orders placed, which made production possible in the first place.
3. IOWs SSI or BB cannot by any means plug the familiar claim that they have developed and therefore need to be compensated. More imp, the vaccine is unlike any other “good” - it is a matter of life and death for all, irrespective of the purchasing power of the “consumer”.
This petition by entities @thewire_in@thenewsminute among others only confirmed my suspicion that the indian legacy media would never fight to stay relevant in the digital realm that is free from Govt control. livelaw.in/top-stories/th…
Its grudging challenge to the draconian IT Rules reveals the truth that it'd be more interested in desperately defending its turf rather than seek embrace the digital realm. This which requires it to abandon its existing business model in favour of something that is democratic.
Seeking subscribers (paid) while retaining its ad-driven model is a hare-brained idea for legacy media. When will they ever learn that the two - ad-driven vs subscriber-based - are incompatible and require a fundamental repositioning.
Thread:
Once upon a time auto companies (among others) used to hire workers as trainees, and keep them as trainees for prolonged periods in order to avoid paying them proper wages and statutory benefits. Now media companies, among them industry leaders do the same.
Since the pandemic several leading media companies, after having sacked journos and imposed wage cuts, have found been innovative in finding new ways to further cut the wage bill. The trick is to engage new journos and take them as "trainees".
The trick is to extend and prolong the trainee's "contract" so that the media companies - many of them the venerable ones from another era - can shortchange these young journos during the pandemic.
Frontline’s latest issue has a comprehensive package of five stories on the budget, each focusing on a particular aspect. @sritara reckons this is the most socially disruptive and divisive budget in the last three decades frontline.thehindu.com/economy/union-…
@ramakumarr argues that the budget, coming as it does in the midst of unprecedented protests by peasants, mocks them and threatens to squeeze their incomes even more
A recent NBER research paper by three Indian-origin authors debunks NaMO Govt's claims of success in handling the pandemic. It shows how the Case Fatality Rate in India, when adjusted for age, in unconscionably high.
Recall that Covid was always supposed to be a disease in which fatalities among the elderly was higher. Given that India is a relatively "young" country, the expectation (statistically speaking) is that overall fatalities would be lower because of the relatively young population.
The study reveals that when adjusted for age distribution in the population, the CFR in India is far higher. It also attempts to examine CFR in terms of the viral disease's lagged effect, considering the incubation period.
And, now comes a shocker of the treatment of a 58-yr old employee of a Chennai-based media company who has worked for almost 30 years. Informed on the phone that the company's retirement age has been reduced from 60 to 58. In good faith he accepted, and resigned! Questions abound
How could a company reduce the retirement age overnight, without notice? How could the retirement age, fixed by a tripartite agreement including the TN Govt many years ago, be reduced uniliaterally, by one party?
This person had in fact, crossed the age of 58, and so assumed that his time was up. Clearly this amounts to forcing a person out by means of false information. That a media company can run it like a lala ka dukan says much about the nature of media ownership in India.