Really struggling to understand this. A young man from NOIDA got a RT/PCR test done which came out negative but he’s been handed a bunch of meds anyway. Now tell me which sort of test report says it can’t be used for medico-legal purposes (look at what I’ve highlighted in red). 
Case history. This man’s brother tested positive on a rapid test but negative on the RT/PCR and has symptoms (fever and loss of taste/smell). The samples of both brothers were collected together at the same place. These are what the results look like.
Private labs doing the same test are also mentioning the Cycle Threshold (CT) score. This one says nothing. For a negative test the CT has to be at or above 40 I’ve been told.
PS: I have permission from the tested man to share this after blacking out his name and case number.
What we discussed was the language at the bottom of the report. Why the specific disclaimer?
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
