NEW: A group of British academics and bloggers sowing disinformation about Syria's use of chemical weapons have coordinated their efforts with four different Russian diplomatic missions around the world, emails show: thedailybeast.com/syria-chemical…
A number of stunning revelations in a three-month correspondence between one of the academics and "Ivan," someone he believed was a Russian spy.

"Ivan" was in reality @CIJAOnline, an NGO collecting evidence of war crimes in Syria, conducting a sting operation.
Professor Paul McKeigue, an epidemiologist at the University of Edinburgh, mapped out his cohort's entire network of disinformation peddlers and their liaisons: Russian officials in The Hague, New York, London and Geneva.
He also disclosed that Melinda Taylor, one of Julian Assange's lawyers, has been helping McKeigue's colleagues conduct what McKeigue termed "lawfare" against the OPCW over its Douma investigation: her pro bono legal memo is attached in one of the emails.
And he helpfully points out that Brendan Whelan, a self-described "whistleblower" at the OPCW, has been liaising regularly with Alexander Shulgin, Russia's ambassador to the Netherlands and its Permanent Representative at the OPCW.
McKeigue solicited "Ivan" to spy on journalists, NGO workers and activists. These include a Russian state media employee, Stephen Mangan, who had shared quite a lot of sensitive biographical details of Syrian eyewitnesses to the Douma attack.
Mangan raised McKeigue's suspicions by sharing evidence that a chemical attack had indeed taken place, according to one eyewitness. So McKeigue told "Ivan," a purported Russian spy, to spy on Mangan, a Ruptly reporter. You really can't make this up and it's all screen grabbed.
There is actually even more to this story, a longer version of which will be published this morning at @newlinesmag. Stay tuned.
And here's that deep-dive investigation: newlinesmag.com/reportage/how-…
One of the dark ironies of this affair is that McKeigue has gone around accusing any number of people who don't conform to his conspiracism about Syria CIA or MI6 agents. Yet he was all too happy to connive with someone he believed was a Russian intelligence officer.
Not only that, he gave "Ivan" a dozen names of British journalists and academics he wanted Ivan to hack. One of these is the @thetimes leader-writer @OliverKamm.
Kamm has written a letter of complaint to the University of Edinburgh, which we've obtained and quoted.
According to @tobycadman, an advisory board member of @CIJAOnline, the emails between "Ivan" and McKeigue has been passed to British authorities to investigate any possible criminal act in suborning a presumed foreign intelligence officer to spy on British citizens.
You might also find it amusing, in light of the hacking element of this saga, to learn that McKeigue's associate Vanessa Beeley maintains "contact" in Geneva with Russian diplomat Sergei Krutskikh.
He is the son of Andrey Krutskikh, who heads the Russian Foreign Ministry's new-minted Department of International Information Security, which coordinates with European countries on cybersecurity.
I continue to marvel at the fact that a scientist reconstructed in his own head what happened in Douma based on what another (dead) scientist unconsciously imagined happened in Ghouta after eating an anchovy pizza. Specifically, this: newlinesmag.com/reportage/how-…

• • •

Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to force a refresh
 

Keep Current with Michael Weiss

Michael Weiss Profile picture

Stay in touch and get notified when new unrolls are available from this author!

Read all threads

This Thread may be Removed Anytime!

PDF

Twitter may remove this content at anytime! Save it as PDF for later use!

Try unrolling a thread yourself!

how to unroll video
  1. Follow @ThreadReaderApp to mention us!

  2. From a Twitter thread mention us with a keyword "unroll"
@threadreaderapp unroll

Practice here first or read more on our help page!

More from @michaeldweiss

19 Apr
This piece by @TomRtweets is the best anatomy I've seen as to the ongoing dispute between CIA and NSA on the now much scrutinized GRU "bounties" story. And it's conveniently short: washingtonexaminer.com/opinion/inside…
Note that there was no climb-down from the original leaked allegations, as reported correctly in the NYT that NSA had a lower level of confidence in this intelligence than did CIA. ("Moderate" confidence means pretty good, in laymen's terms.)
The fact that this intelligence made it into the President's Daily Brief (Trump's) also suggested it wasn't quite the nothing-burger it's since been portrayed as in the press. Ditto making it into the WH statement on sanctions:
Read 16 tweets
17 Apr
I'm going to watch this tomorrow, but I still can't figure why they had to invent a CIA case officer for Rachel Brosnahan to play. She'd have been perfect as Janet Chisholm, who (to my mind) played a more daring role than Wynne in this op. spytalk.co/p/spytalk-at-t…
You've essentially got MI6's answer to the Marvelous Mrs. Maisel in this character.
There was initially almost no suspicion about Penkovsky, whose cover gig was to meet trade delegations, gallivanting around Moscow with Wynne. Janet, meanwhile, had to do brush-passes in broad daylight, in a Moscow park, with -- checks notes -- three small children and a pram.
Read 4 tweets
17 Apr
So in 2014 the GRU blew up Czech military ammunition destined, via a Bulgarian arms dealer, for Ukraine. Then it twice tried to murder the Bulgarian with a nerve agent, first in Sofia, then on the Bulgarian coast. The puzzle pieces finally fall into place.
Emilian Gebrev had all sorts of other theories as to why the Russians wanted him dead—his arms dealing to Georgia and Ukraine, he believed, was too small-stakes to qualify.
An excellent thread on this breaking news.
Read 16 tweets
15 Apr
So here now, from the White House itself, is the mention of the GRU/Taliban 'bounties' claim. No sanctions levied, but the matter is "being handled through diplomatic, military and intelligence channels": whitehouse.gov/briefing-room/… Image
Note that it isn't much of a revelation that the IC assessed the 'bounties' story with "low-moderate confidence." NSA and CIA always disagreed about this allegation. From NYT, July 2020: ImageImage
And the intelligence wasn't just based on Taliban detainee interrogations. It's next to impossible, for instance, that detainees would have known which specific unit of the GRU was responsible for these payments. Intercepts played a part, as per NYT: nytimes.com/2020/06/30/us/… Image
Read 5 tweets
15 Apr
The U.S. government affirms for the first time that a Russian spy close to Trump's campaign chair in 2016 not only received privileged Trump campaign information but did indeed pass it along to the Russian Intelligence Services. In case you thought Mueller was the last word...
As to which agency Kilimnik worked for, it's almost certainly the GRU. Why? Let's look at his background.
In the mid-90s he taught Swedish at the Military University for Foreign Languages of the Russian Ministry of Defense -- a customary educational pathway for GRU officers.
Read 4 tweets
15 Apr
Treasury sanctions a bunch of RIS-run disinformation portals including InfoRos, a GRU cut-out. home.treasury.gov/news/press-rel…
WaPo reported on InfoRos in 2018, naming it as a likely GRU front:
And .@NicolasQuenel reported on how it was implicated in French-language COVID disinformation: nextinpact.com/article/30338/…
Read 6 tweets

Did Thread Reader help you today?

Support us! We are indie developers!


This site is made by just two indie developers on a laptop doing marketing, support and development! Read more about the story.

Become a Premium Member ($3/month or $30/year) and get exclusive features!

Become Premium

Too expensive? Make a small donation by buying us coffee ($5) or help with server cost ($10)

Donate via Paypal Become our Patreon

Thank you for your support!

Follow Us on Twitter!